Do girls prefer guys to have a tight or loose circumcision?

Anonymous

is it better/healthier for all of the foreskin and frenulum to be removed or is it better to have some foreskin remaining?

0 1

Most Helpful Guys

Anonymous
+1 y
I have it completely done and it enhanced our sex life a lot. That anti-circumcision movement these days comes from left-winged anti-semites and is scientifically seen complete b*llshit.
0 1 1 1
- cavmanier
  +1 y
  By enhance you mean it took away sensation so you can last longer?
- Opinion Owner
  +1 y
  I can last way longer, at least about double the time. And it didn't do a thing to sensation. Many people point out that the surgery as such can go wrong, but by statistics more men become impotent by cancer than by circumcision (factor of roughly 1500).
AdamThomas Guru
+1 y
I wish people would just stop cutting people's genitals altogether man, it's pointless.
2 2 0 1
- iPood
  +1 y
  +1 to this.

Most Helpful Girls

iPood Yoda
+1 y
no circumcision would be best. Beyond that I don't much care either way.
0 2 0 1
- thtdiablo
  +1 y
  And for what reason? It clearly enhances health (see books in a comment further up here) and it enhances sex lives. What reason speaks against beside ideology?
- iPood
  +1 y
  Why change something that is totally natural? Uncut feels better during sex and they are not in any way unclean unless a man has poor overall hygeine. I'm also not fond of the scar that cut penises have along with the fact that the tip is usually a different color than the base (ie above the scar is one color skin and below the scar is a totally different color). It is just visually unneappealing to me and totally unnessesary.
confugirl Yoda
+1 y
It's better to just leave the foreskin alone. Seriously, don't cut it.
1 2 0 1
- thtdiablo
  +1 y
  Why not? I did and it didn't only enhance our sex life, it is also (scientifically proven - books mentioned in another comment here) that it's the healthier way.
- confugirl
  +1 y
  It is not healthier and any study which somehow shows its "advantages" ignores any other circumstances. And it does not improve your sex life, since it removes a lot of nerve endings. Not only that, but it removes the skin that protects your glans, which becomes desensitized from all the stimulation it has without the foreskin.
- confugirl
  +1 y
  With a foreskin, your penis will slide in and out the foreskin as well as the vagina, enabling you to enjoy sex more without doing the jackhammer type of sex that women absolutely hate.
Anonymous
+1 y
It's healthier to have foreskin remaining.
1 2 0 1
- thtdiablo
  +1 y
  Nope, it's scientifically proven that not. You decisively reduce the risk of all kinds of penile cancer without it. Hurrelmann, Klotz, Haisch, "Lehrbuch Pr?vention und Gesundheitsf?rderung", Bern 2010; Spiess, "Penile Cancer: Diagnosis and Treatment", Humana Press, New York 2013 The idea, that it is "healthier" to keep the foreskin dates back to pre-Hitler anti-semitism. Science has only proven that it is GOOD for health to circumcise, it has never proven the opposite.
- Opinion Owner
  +1 y
  It's there to protect your penis from dirt, which might cause infections. Without it, you have a higher risk to get an infection instead. The cancer thing is great, but there's a higher risk to get infected than to get cancer.
- G-Daz
  +1 y
  thtdiablo: Europe is around 95% uncut and have a 40% lower rate of std's and 20% lower penile health problems so that isn't strictly true. The idea of it being healthier to have it removed was based on unsupported theories that later became negative link