Agree or Disagree: Side chicks provide a lot more than sex to cheating men?

Agree or Disagree: Side chicks provide a lot more than sex to cheating men?
2 2

Most Helpful Guys

  • Has to be so. Side chick or not, new girls provide a lot of sex to promote male bonding with them and when they think you are they start shutting up shop... if you let them.

    For a side chick though she is in a competitive position but is fundamentally offering the same product as the main chick. As in any product competition, manufacturers can offer the same thing cheaper/easier or offer a superior product to the well known brand.

    So I think this means, a side chick has to offer more plentiful sex at a better standard. Can you imagine a side chick getting away with "Not tonight honey". No, I can't either.

    With strippers I've noticed if you had a fav she would get lackadaisical. If you had two favs they would initially be competitive and you would get better grinding in lap dances. But they quickly accept the situation and both would get lackadaisical.

    If you had three favs it was completely different. Inherently 3 favs was dynamically unstable and I am pretty sure they each thought one of the three of them might cease to be a fav. The result was they never got lackadaisical.

    So I think if you were lucky enough to be able to run three side chicks or two side chicks and a main chick with them knowing that then that would be the complete sweet spot.

  • Agree. All guys should have a couple of them.

    • 🤣🤣🤣

    • Thanks for the MHO

Most Helpful Girls

  • As someone who has been a “side chick”, agree. If his relationship was fulfilling, he wouldn’t be looking elsewhere. It’s a sign you made a bad decision in your main relationship. Whenever we could get together, we obviously had sex but I was a safe place to vent about his problems and an escape from the stresses of his kids and his marriage. He always said he could just be himself and I didn’t understand that at first but I eventually did. We hung out and had fun and screwed around like teenagers. There was no real world component. He didn’t have to worry about finances or the fight he had with her or the pressures of raising kids. He felt trapped in his life and he didn’t when he was with me. Eventually though, I wanted more and he couldn’t walk away from his family and I had to end it. As much as the whole thing hurt in the end for us both, I always knew he loved me and what our time together meant. I’m not saying any of this is ethical or right because I was just a crutch that helped him cope with a dysfunctional marriage but it illustrates there’s more than just sex to these scenarios.

  • I think typically if there is a side chick it’s because something is missing in their relationship.

Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions

What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!

What Girls & Guys Said

23 35
  • Has to be according to the cheating man and the side chick, wouldn't it?

    Maybe the cheater is done with his relationship, but too chicken to exit for a bunch of reasons. So the side chick is his therapist/friend and occasional sex partner.

    But, often side chicks are just that: associates with benefits. I avoid the word "friend" because I don't think sex partners are friends. They're just ways to blow off sexual stresses/steam.

    But, if a guy is honest with himself and his original partner, he won't be schlepping around with a "side chick." He'll call it quits, lick his wounds, heal and venture into new relationships when he's back on his feet.

    All this cheating and relationships on the DL and FWBs seem incredibly lazy. Fish or cut bait. None of this half in, half out. Be done with one, THEN move on to another.

  • I think it depends. Some give emotional connection, too.

    But I think most of them are exclusively sex centric.

    The sidebitch my cheating ex chose was only a sex thing. She was married, and chose her husband in the end when he decided to take her back (his mistake). And then she tried to get buddy with me so she could bully my ex, and I told her off for that - she'd damaged him enough and I wanted nothing to do with her.

    So she only gave him sex, but also was eager to betray him and bully him. So in my opinion it's worse than if it was just sex. She used him, and would've abused him if l let her.

    • I’m so sorry that happened to you. But I will disagree that most are exclusively sex centric. For better or worse, we’re in an age where sex is the easy part. There’s porn, strippers, and escorts that all come with less drama and risk of blowing up an established relationship. A side-chick is an emotional affair, where you’re getting something different than from main chick. It’s not just sex. The turn on can even boost the sex-life with main-chick. If you’re still together, you should talk about and try to get to the real why, or it might happen again.

    • Lmao, oh no, I dumped him that day. There's no forgiving cheaters, not for me. I don't trust easily and that betrayal means the cheater is not worth my trust. The way you deflect makes me think you're a cheater just looking for justification. Gross. No need to interact further.

  • They Seem to have Something the Significant Other Doesn't have. xxoo

  • Agree

  • Wouldn't know, never cheated and never will. Purely on logical side they provide them with someone new and intriguing to them, a thrill to be exact but don't know if there is m ore to it, maybe depends on why they are doing it or is it just purely sex or there are feelings involved. Cheating is wrong, can understand why some guys and girls (they are equal in this and we all know it) cheat but still if you aren't happy in your relationship then break up and do casual all you want after that. I would feel terrible if someone cheated on me regardless if it was happy relationship or not so that is why i would never try to hurt someone in that way

  • The side person (Fe/male) always gives more sex from what I hear probably because partners have more problems to deal which can cause tense between the two and can make them not have as much sex. But the relationship with the side person don't real have any serious stresses so less tension between the two so a lot more sex.

  • I think there are circumstances where that is true and others where it's not.

  • As someone who’s been a side chick, I agree. The guy I was the side chick to was frustrated with his wife as she didn’t want sex anymore and they were arguing every day. The guy was only staying in his main relationship because of their kids. Every other aspect of a loving relationship was with me. He eventually broke off his main relationship and got with me full time which I then broke off shortly afterwards because I found out that he had a side chick for his side chick.

  • All my side chicks were fun at first but they all turn into a pain in the ass, some faster than others. It seems like the desire for sex is mutual but chicks seem to have this other drive to get their claws in (different chicks have different ways of doing that), which is what I find annoying about chicks in general.

    At this point, at least for me, I'd rather just pay for a hooker if I need to get off on the side.

  • I think it's possible, but probably not in every case.

  • I agree 100%
    In some cases, it's not about the sex at all. Husbands and wives both get busy and sometimes bored with their spouses. It's not good but it happens all the time. My wife for example has zero interest in many outdoor events. I on the other hand want to be outside in any weather. If I found a “side chick” (I don't like that term) who enjoyed being outside as much as me then that would be a bonus AND she would be doing what my wife would not. It's a plus to a mans life not a minus to a marriage. I know women would not see it the same way... That's ok. I do understand both sides.

  • Well they provide a lot more drama to the man's life so sure agree

  • Side chicks and boys are all worthless humans who should be killed. Just like child rapists

  • Well when I was a side chicken it was just sex. No hanging out or anything.

    • chick or chicken you were a side dish?

    • @smilelots hahaha. Oops

    • @smilelots chick

    • Show All
  • I don't think it provides them with much save for an escape. To have a woman acting like how their girlfriend/wife did before the honeymoon phase ends. When the honeymoon phase ends is when sex slows down, nagging begins and the true personality comes out. Can become old quick for many people.

  • Maybe. Every case is different.

  • No clue. Never been a side chick. I ain't desperate.

  • More sex and more importantly desire. A lot of wives just stop putting in the work on that side of the relationship, she's plenty of time for everything and everyone else except her husband.

  • A man who cheats proves that he has no love or feelings for his wife.

  • I've never cheated so I wouldn't know. If I had girlfriend, why would I have a side chick. When my girlfriend is already next side to me in bed 🤷‍♂️, just grab it.

  • Show More (38)