Do you believe that MAPs are totally acceptable and shouldn't be ashamed of their attraction to children?

So apparently woke people are now claiming that MAPs (minor attracted people, aka pedophiles) have every right to be open about the fact that they're attracted to children and society should be accepting. wtf? What are your thoughts?
Updates:
+1 y
+1 y
file:///home/chronos/u-03c8ca7e9921ebf2d3aa9139c7640d7c8c734468/MyFiles/Downloads/FQfRfAiXwAEDSmE. jpg
0 2

Superb Opinion

  • This crap has been the goal all along. It's why they've been pushing so hard for Trans activism, which just about everyone not in the 10% or so who are Far Left activists realize is not a lifestyle but a mental illness. If they can convince the population to buy into normalizing Trans, then they can normalize pedos too, because if they can get you to believe that genitals and hormones have nothing to do with gender, when we all know that it does, then they can get you to accept anything.

    Too many people aren't taking this seriously, because they don't actually believe it will affect them, so they don't care about the people it DOES hurt - but as soon as their own lives are affected, they snap out of it and are suddenly against the very thing they told everyone was completely fine.

    If you've ever read Orwell's 1984, then you know how twisting the definitions of words, so that the actual meanings of words are completely lost, which then means that nothing can be wrong because it's not possible to describe anything as being bad - that's exactly what they're doing.

    It's no accident that people like Epstein exist, and that lots of powerful and wealthy people take advantage of their "hospitality" - and if you think Epstein was the only one doing this, you're crazy.

    This is why the Left is trying to pass literal grooming bills - bills that are the mirror opposite of the Florida bill - in a number of dark blue states. These laws literally make it legal for teachers to groom young children and to conceal this from the parents - and lots of people actually support this, being so indoctrinated that they think they're just being nice to trans people. It's SO much more than just that, but they don't care - they just want to feel good about themselves, and their tribe is telling them that supporting these bills is the current "good thing" to support and "make the world a better place", so they fully support it without ever having read it.

    • Hear hear, sir!

    • does this guy ever miss!

Most Helpful Guy

  • There is a difference between a "MAP" and a pedophile.
    Pedophilia = sexual preference for prepubescent children
    Hebephilia = sexual preference for children in early adolescence, between ages 11 and 14
    Ephebophilia = attraction for older adolescents around 15 to 18 years old

    There is also a difference between thinking about something and doing that something.
    I often think about murdering various people or stealing from them or some other criminal act, but I will never act on those thoughts.

    THIS IS THE DEFINITION OF MINOR-ATTRACTED PERSON PER THE ORIGINAL DEFINING SYMPOSIUM:
    www.b4uact.org/.../...osium-Proceedings-Part-1.pdf

    Pedophilia, Minor-Attracted Persons, and the DSM: Issues and Controversies
    Wednesday, August 17, 2011
    Baltimore, Maryland
    Symposium Proceedings

    ...
    A Minor-Attracted Person – or MAP – is a person whose primary emotional and sexual attraction is to children or adolescents younger than him or herself. Note that MAPs include adolescents primarily attracted to prepubescent children or to adolescents younger than themselves. This term refers to feelings of attraction only; it implies nothing about behavior.
    ======
    From the Keynote Address at the symposium...

    Keynote: On the Paraphilias, including Pedophilia,
    from a Psychiatric Perspective
    Fred S. Berlin, M. D., Ph. D.1
    Associate Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
    Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
    A personal tribute

    I’d like to start out by acknowledging one of the founding individuals of B4U-ACT, a gentleman named Michael Melsheimer, who passed away last year. I had known him for quite a long time, and found him to be one of the most courageous, decent, and honest people that I have come across. He was a man who never hesitated to speak his mind, and sometimes, in the face of very intense emotion, would try to have conversations of a very thoughtful and respectful nature. Mike would not mind me sharing some of the things I’m going to say, so I’m not talking about things that he wasn’t talking about in public. He was a man who, in growing up, discovered himself to be attracted to young boys, and early in his life, this was very confusing for him. Certainly in his early years, he did not necessarily think there was anything wrong with acting on such attractions. Later on in his life, I’ve forgotten exactly when, perhaps in his 30s, he travelled to Thailand, and he was absolutely appalled by the way children were exploited sexually in child prostitution and so on. He came back to the United States looking at things rather differently than he
    had previously. One of the things that he thought very strongly about, though, and which I think is one of the factors that led him to start B4U-ACT, is that he recognized that when he was younger, he had nobody to talk to about the fact that he was having such feelings. In fact, he was terrified to let anybody know he had these attractions, and he wanted to be able to encourage young people, who might be having similar feelings, to be able to come forward, and as the name of his organization suggests, before you act
    Beyond looking simply at how people are going to conduct themselves as far as behavior is concerned, Mike felt very strongly that people, who are having these attractions, should still feel good about themselves, particularly if they were being responsible about how they were dealing with them, and he felt very badly about the stigma that was tied to a label such as pedophilia, something that I’m going to talk about in some detail shortly. He wasn’t advocating that it was okay to be sexual with children, but he had the understanding that simply having these attractions did not make one an evil person.
    ...

    • That all makes sense. Everyone is entitled to thoughts, fantasies and attractions. But I don't understand how anyone would know that they were attracted to prepubescent kids unless they talked about it. For talking openly about their attractions, other than in counseling, they should be ostracized from society. And if they act upon their urges, they should be branded on the forehead and imprisoned.

Most Helpful Girls

  • I remember hearing years ago it was a genetic thing, that made people lean that way.

    Genetic or not, it matters not how someone is born because they ALWAYS have a choice to ignore that. Imagine how much crap people could get away with it, they blamed everything on how they were born.

    Not acceptable, as no one can make society or anyone accept things they disagree with at all. Don't even try, it will just be a waste of time and energy.

    Although if someone does publicly say they are, then I know how to keep any children away from.

  • Excuse my language, but FUCK. NO.


    I will never accept them. I will never accept pedophile, I will never accept incest, I will never accept bestiality, I will never accept anything of that nature. It is morally wrong, and it is disgusting.


    I don’t care if they’re non offenders (they don’t act on it) but they just have the thoughts. I still think it’s disgusting because they even have those thoughts. Having the thoughts vs actually acting on it is a significant difference, but still wrong. Acting on it will always be worse.

    • Totally agreed !

Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions

What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!

What Girls & Guys Said

15 38
  • I do see it as a mental illness I do not think it should be accepted however. If you are found to have an attraction to children it is only a matter of time before you act on it so you should be monitored closely and never allowed around children. Because I as a heavly armed momma bear will be waiting for you with a Remington 870 if you ever touch my kids.

  • WTF NO, children are already harassed and even raped and killed by those. Children must be protected not used for some mad people satisfaction

  • I don't care who they're attracted to. They can be ashamed or not by it, I shouldn't even know about someone else's attractions if we're not romantically involved. But any action toward a child should always protected against and be punished severely.

  • 1. I don't think anyone ever makes a conscious choice that leads to them being attracted to children and no one should be punished for merely having those thoughts. I know that I cannot control being attracted to petite women with delicate features and I cannot change what it is that arouses me.

    2. Everyone is capable of controlling their impulses and having such thoughts NEVER justifies acting on those thoughts. Anyone who crosses the line and tries to solicit or groom a minor for sexual activity should have their genitals removed by woefully untrained surgeons.

  • F*ck no! They should be monitored by the FBI at all times.
    I'm not surprised though. Those in power have been trying to ruin and demoralize Western society for a while now. Why wouldn't they try to make sickos "acceptable" in society? They already did it in the LGBT community.

  • WTF? This is the first I have heard of this term but knowing that they now define Paedophiles as MAP's is nothing more that putting an acronym on something to make it sound normal. Sickening.

    • The ones that created the term MAP were the pedophiles themselves, to soften up the language and make it seem more acceptable, as opposed to being called a pedophile.

  • I have never heard that, I know LGBT people made it clear they don't support them either.

    I feel it's just as valid as anyone who isn't attracted to their customers counterpart, they love to say "you can't help what you're attracted too" after all, but no they can't be open about it or practice it, kids are off limits.

  • I’m just glad I don’t find children attractive…This must be awful


    I like unusual features, freckles, red hair, dimples on the chin or bottom of the back, small features like breast, wrists, hand & feet etc.


    I know others simply think we should shoot dead anyone who is attracted to children, I’m not disagreeing I’m simply saying this can’t be nice for them to know and it’s not something they choose.


    Acting on this is a very different thing.

  • No, absolutely fucking not.

  • I’m totally fine with it… I got a beautiful niece admire her all you want… touch her and I’ll cut off your fucking dick and deep throat you with it until you die…


    We have no right to say how people feel, whom their attracted to, what the value, or who and why they hate is wrong. We do however have not only good reason to block it but punish those that act on it… aka pedos and racists…

  • Absolutely not. That's child abuse that they are trying to justify.

  • I can accept their attraction. That's just a thought. It doesn't affect anyone else. I can't accept non-consensial sex.

  • IRL, fck yes its wrong! But, I use to do a lot of DDLG til I got to old (yup lines up with the rest of my comments now u know & things happen to me) and wow so many pedos online. Protect your kids and install software too.

    • DDLG?

    • @historectomy DDLG, or DD/LG, is an acronym for daddy dom/little girl, a sexual relationship where the dominant male is the daddy figure and a woman plays the role of a young girl.

  • Pretty disturbing if you ask me, no need to accept them or what they are doing

  • Never heard this term!

  • If we accept them, we allow them to give in to their lust and destroy the minor's life before it began. The only 'map' I know is the one that tells me where to go. I will keep calling them pedos and no I don't believe they should be accepted.

  • Lol... You are lying on the internet... How inspired

  • Ummmm... in my opinion if they're open about the fact they should really work on themselves because children do not need to be traumatized like that. They should go to therapy or anything if that works.

  • No. They and those who support them, apologize for them or defend them, should all be skinned alive and nailed to wooden posts. They all deserve to die in pain.

    @SecretsofKB @PrettyPriya
    Heads up for pedos.

  • Apparently teachers in Florida love the idea

  • Show More (33)