Absolutely!!! That's all she is good for.. just to have sex with..
0000
Anonymous
1 y
I won't go anywhere near them, even if they were the last on Earth!
0000
Anonymous
1 y
Yes. Most men agree that a female with lots of dick is useless and gross.
0000
Anonymous
1 y
I don't care one way or the other.
0000
Anonymous
1 y
I don't think less of them, but I do find it less attractive. But that doesn't mean I think it's wrong. Like, it might be similar to how I like physically delicate girls, it's cute, but that doesn't mean I look down upon girls who work out or lift weights.
And quite frankly, if just a few preferences of mine were tweaked a little different, I'd undoubtedly be a manwhore anyways. 😂
0000
magiusX26
1 y
finding them less attractive is thinking less of them
Opinion Owner
1 y
No, it's not. I presume what you're saying is 'well both sentences use the word less, so you are thinking less of them.' But "less of them" is a phrase, or idiom, it means something beyond just the literal definitions of those words. When people say they think less of somebody, they don't mean "I find them less attractive." They mean they consider them to be more condemnable, or consider them to be of lesser value or quality. Of which I do not think of those who are more liberal with their sex life.
magiusX26
1 y
nope. finding someone less attractive is also seeing them as less because seeing them as less means you desire them less than others and attraction is a part of desirability you tried focusing only on the morals aspect instead of the full definition which includes teaits beyond just moral reasonings.
Show All Show Less
Opinion Owner
1 y
I didn't "try" focusing on the moral aspect, I DID focus on the moral aspect. That's what I was referring to, it was the subject of my statement. It's what the phrase "think less of" means.
If I asked you "hey, want to go to iHop?" Would you respond with "you're trying to focus only on the local iHop, but there are thousands of iHops out there!" Like, yeah, but what relevance does that have? Clearly in this context I was referring to the local iHop. Applying a broader definition to words I used doesn't invalidate the context the word is being used in.
By your logic, when comparing two people, one with 1 million hair follicles on their head, and another with 900 thousand follicles on their head, I should "think less of" the person with 900 thousand follicles, because they have "less follicles."
But that doesn't make sense because the phrase "think less of" cannot be deduced to "less." These are not interchangeable.
What Girls & Guys Said
3 35Nope.
Not at all
How many is tons?
No not at all
Nope I want to be added to the list
No one respects a whore
Obviously yes
Nope, life should be fun
Only if she don't sleep with me
Absolutely!!! That's all she is good for.. just to have sex with..
I won't go anywhere near them, even if they were the last on Earth!
Yes. Most men agree that a female with lots of dick is useless and gross.
I don't care one way or the other.
I don't think less of them, but I do find it less attractive. But that doesn't mean I think it's wrong. Like, it might be similar to how I like physically delicate girls, it's cute, but that doesn't mean I look down upon girls who work out or lift weights.
And quite frankly, if just a few preferences of mine were tweaked a little different, I'd undoubtedly be a manwhore anyways. 😂
finding them less attractive is thinking less of them
No, it's not. I presume what you're saying is 'well both sentences use the word less, so you are thinking less of them.' But "less of them" is a phrase, or idiom, it means something beyond just the literal definitions of those words. When people say they think less of somebody, they don't mean "I find them less attractive." They mean they consider them to be more condemnable, or consider them to be of lesser value or quality. Of which I do not think of those who are more liberal with their sex life.
nope. finding someone less attractive is also seeing them as less because seeing them as less means you desire them less than others and attraction is a part of desirability you tried focusing only on the morals aspect instead of the full definition which includes teaits beyond just moral reasonings.
I didn't "try" focusing on the moral aspect, I DID focus on the moral aspect. That's what I was referring to, it was the subject of my statement. It's what the phrase "think less of" means.
If I asked you "hey, want to go to iHop?" Would you respond with "you're trying to focus only on the local iHop, but there are thousands of iHops out there!" Like, yeah, but what relevance does that have? Clearly in this context I was referring to the local iHop. Applying a broader definition to words I used doesn't invalidate the context the word is being used in.
By your logic, when comparing two people, one with 1 million hair follicles on their head, and another with 900 thousand follicles on their head, I should "think less of" the person with 900 thousand follicles, because they have "less follicles."
But that doesn't make sense because the phrase "think less of" cannot be deduced to "less." These are not interchangeable.
Here is the official explanation of the phrase by Merriam Webster: www.merriam-webster.com/.../think%20less%20of
Yes.