Do you think that the "guys are more visual than girls" thing is untrue and that it's just a different way of being visual?

Updates:
+1 y
For clarification: Maybe it's not that guys are more visual than girls, but that they're both equally visually attracted to people but just with different purposes
0 2

Superb Opinion

  • I personally disagree with the statement that "guys are more visual aroused than girls", at least on the basis of my own personal feelings and experiences.

    I'm more attracted to women and arroused by them on the basis of physical touch. Don't get me wrong, I can appreciate a woman's beauty, but I personally get much more turned on when she runs her fingers through my hair, or nibbles on my neck~💕

    Plus, I think that girls aren't just physically or contextually attracted to guys either, and that being visually attracted to a guy your interested isn't weird or abnormal, it's just to be expected since you're attracted to them.

    I've seen this idea thrown around a lot in psychology and pop-culture, and I personally feel like society has us asking the wrong questions on this topic. I think that the way you find your particular love interest attractive is largely a matter of your personality and life experiences.

    At least, that's my opinion anyway.☺️

Most Helpful Guy

  • The visual thing is from fMRI studies that show that the centers for arousal in men are tied to the visual cortex while in women they're tied to the areas for imagination. Suggesting that guys see sexy while women think sexy.

    So women may see something sexy and process it in thought but a guy just bypasses the thought process all together.

Most Helpful Girls

  • Im too visual, i want my man shave all hairs except head hair, and be dominant on bed, and want them to consume feminine hormones so they will look prettier than me 🤤🤤

  • It isn't true. Girls can be visual too

    • Are you visual?

    • Yess very visual!

    • In what way?

    • Show All

Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions

What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!

What Girls & Guys Said

1 19
  • I'd say men more often than women are more likely to be stimulated or aroused by visual sensations (rather than verbal or audible).

  • Men are much more visual than women, it's totally true, feminists are lying about that.

    https://www.youtube.com/embed/A9WZFeA4FzI
  • Sexually speaking... men are way more visual than women.

  • It isn't true. Most of the guys that say that are the same guys complaining about being too short. Women are visually attracted to people just like guys are.

  • As regards to sexuality specifically, I think men are far more visual.

  • I think that all depends, people's minds are all wired differently and I can say my mindset is probably different compared to maybe 80% of the population.

  • I would say that's true. Women are very visual creatures.

  • I've seen old fat dudes with ugly faces who are RICH, have the hottest women around them. And have multiple women to boot! The hotter she is, the more she only cares about how much MONEY, STATUS OR FAME the dude has. And she will even share the fat ugly slob with other women. It's all about MONEY for dudes.

  • I think its true, we surely have exceptions so I would say, "most guys are more visual then most girls"

  • I think it's completely untrue

  • I do think that guys are a bit more visual, while girls tend to be more affected by touch or words.

  • can you explain this... I can get turned on from a photo of a complete stranger... and I mean full blown Turned On

  • Cannot get it.

  • guys are visually stimulated than girls is my opinion

  • I'm not sure if I understand

  • Guys ARE way more visual than girls can ever be

  • Yes and opposite is also true

  • Nope.
    Males are definitely biologically visually stimulated and women are more mentally stimulated.
    This is science.

  • guys are more visual

    girls are more shallow

  • Everyone have different visualisation so yeah, untrue maybe