Do you think there should be an lgbt state or countries?

Question

An independent country of their own, lgbt members and supporters all over the world should go there (I'm not saying anything bad, please don't complain)

Anonymous · Accepted Answer

No mate, when you post something you have to be prepared for complaints as well, you can't make demands for people to not complain about things you post.

So about the subject at hand, I understand that people in the LGBT+ community may perhaps desire a location that makes it easier for them to find others who are also LGBT+ so they can date and maybe even marry, this is because the sexuality of people is often quite difficult to find and it can be a bit awkward to bring the subject up, but there are already dating apps and other types of ways to find people in that community to know faster, it is just that we tend to not use them because LGBT+ people don't often like putting their sexuality on online dating profile descriptions unless they are very open about it.

But to suggest a entire location that is just for people who are LGBT+ where they either go of their own will or are shipped to, if it was a matter of being sent there against there will then we would be going way back in time where people who were not straight were just not accepted and if it was of free will and just an island where they could visit out of interest, it would still be a waste of land because we have other ways already for finding people of that sexuality.

You realise that people who are not straight do still want to be in the company of someone who is straight right? You know they won't like you in any special way so if you don't want to date then it is something important, to have straight friends to be with who you know won't get those types of feelings for you.

N192K001 · Accepted Answer

For their sake,  no .  Targeting them (esp. the transgender) and getting-away with it would be easier.  (And Islamic State's next target, guaranteed! And let's not forget old, and now mostly-unmentioned al-Qa'ida, which still does exist, by the way!) Law-enforcement would be at a loss at trying to identify dead/unconscious of victims from an entire block of their society (trans) if their I. D.'s were confiscated, rendered unreadable, and/or destroyed. And when the data exists, can you imagine the nightmare of notaries-public, I. D.-database registrars, law-enforcement pursuing the inevitable fugitives, etc. It would be a demographer's nightmare! Government-planners, tax-authorities, finance-ministers, etc. would hate managing it. The nation they will work hard to establish will evaporate in just a generation. Add to that terrorist-attacks, their high suicide-rates, and victimization by criminals emboldened by their law-enforcement's incapacitation,  and  their land will only cry for invasion by Islamic State to re-establish actual administration of an actual de-facto nation-state, organized-crime wanting a turf where they are the undisputed authorities with no threat of any jurisdiction's law-enforcement operatives, and/or the original owners wanting their land back. Whatever the case, it's an endeavor condemned to failure, death, and destruction from the very beginning.

Brainsbeforebeauty · Accepted Answer

Wouldn't that be considered segregation? So are you really saying people should be segregated because of their sexual orientation?

AmandaYVR · Accepted Answer

No I believe in integration in all contexts. I don't like silos. I don't think they're as healthy for societies.

OlderAndWiser · Answer

You are going to get a fair amount of PC blowback on simply making this suggestion!

MCheetah · Answer

Isn't that already California? Either way, I don't care.

spookiebxch · Answer

“I’m not saying anything bad” Yes, yes you are. Even if you don’t realize it. You still are.

dustybiker · Answer

Nobody is superior to anyone else.

Astarlessnightsky · Answer

What about people who don't want to go there? Do you want to use Nazi methods deporting them into closed of "camps"?

Thats getting more and more ridiculous, instead of simply accepting everyone for whom they are, mistakes of the past are repeated, dividing society further and further.

NathanDavis · Answer

or... we throw you, on a little island and stay there on your own I mean... it's an option as much as yours... I don't mean anything bad by it

RolandCuthbert · Answer

How in the world could that even happen? Would you ship a family member to another nation simply because of your bigoted views? And if you would, why on earth would others join you when they love their gay brothers, sisters, sons, daughters?

ThisDudeHere · Answer

Where would you even make it? All the land besides Antarctica is already occupied by some country.

jshm2 · Answer

No. There really should be no LGBTQ+ whatever to begin with. You're just people like everyone else, deluded into thinking you're something special.

Cherry234 · Answer

No I don’t think so. I don’t like the idea of separating people

Avicenna · Answer

Well, beyond the question of where this state would be, do those groups of people even want their own state?

Sargentcaptain · Answer

No, that would be absolutely retarded. The people of gayistan would die off within a generation and one's sexuality is a dogshit unifier anyway.

andreasderjuengere · Answer

Who needs one other Israel/Palestine story?

exitseven · Answer

No, then every special group would want their own country. We would soon run out of countries.

VDrago14 · Answer

Honestly, as unique as it sounds, it would only make it a target from those that would serve to hate them. Honestly integration is better than isolation.