Of course, they're arousing to look at. (i so recognise they have functions other than sexual titillation. But they're still a sexually enticing part of the female figure)
0000
ronysinhXper 3
+1 y
Yess definitely, they are very sexy due to them girl look more beautiful and make girls figure look more sexy.
2000
jamesgoldmanMaster
+1 y
No, human udders once you're given that mental image they stop being sexual
0000
Torari
+1 y
Until you consider the fact that udders, like all other mammal mammaries are exclusively present while a cow is lactating. Human mammaries are always present regardless of reproductive status. There is clearly no functional advantage to having two flabby lumps hanging off your chest, which leads us to assume, it has to be a sexual adaptation. Women with tits reproduced more despite the physical disadvantages tits bring them. Making tits a sexual organ. Evolved to attract mates.
John83Guru
+1 y
Yes, because if they're exposed to me, it's usually when we're about to have sex.
0000
Browneye57Master
+1 y
Yes, they're sexual. At your age you should know better. Where ya been hiding all your life?
0000
MakeushiverYoda
+1 y
Definitely women's breasts. Men can get turned on by nipple play also though
0000
The-Senko-SanXper 7
+1 y
I dont think so
1100
here2helpuALLXper 5
+1 y
I think so but I also think women being comfortable with their breast size is super attractive as well. If they aren't then in down to help them get comfortable because size isn't really an issue for me
0000
MassagemanEditor
+1 y
The breasts, or mammary glands in mammals, are there to feed the offspring. That is one of many attributes of mammals in the animal kingdom. They have spines, they bear their young live, they have mammary glands to feed them, they have a way to regulate their temperature, etc and many others.
As a free bonus, God gave us heightened sensitivity- yes guys, in you too - - - not just the gals- in your breast's nipples as well. So, in His infinite wisdom, He made the breasts and nipples BOTH a nursing mechanism AND an arousal mechanism.
How fair and pleasant you are, O loved one, delectable maiden! You are stately as a palm tree, and your breasts are like its clusters. I say I will climb the palm tree and lay hold of its branches. Oh, may your breasts be like clusters of the vine, and the scent of your breath like apples, and your kisses like the best wine that goes down smoothly, gliding over lips and teeth. Excerpted from Song of Songs, Chapter 4
0000
genericname85Master
+1 y
i find them "sexy", not inherently "sexual".
1000
Grond21Guru
+1 y
Yes, very much so, but they are cool because they also feed life. And they aren't sexual to me in that context. They play two roles.
1000
olivia093
+1 y
Yes they feed life, but does it make it non sexual?
DIRKINOFFXper 5
+1 y
At the risk of hypersexualing women, I'm going to say that I think of every part if a woman's body as sexual in nature. If it has potential of bringing them, or myself, pleasure than I'm going to explore the idea.
0000
DIRKINOFF
+1 y
Hyper-sexualizing
reptocarl2Yoda
+1 y
Of course they’re sexual
1000
TattiaXper 5
+1 y
yeah
0100
OfDeathMaster
+1 y
To be perfectly honest, no.
1000
DiversityHireXper 7
+1 y
I absolutely do, though when the situation calls for it I can put my hormones on the back burner lol.
1000
TeddyGotTXper 5
+1 y
Yeah they are sexual, but they shouldn't be
0000
JustinT0403Xper 3
+1 y
I do. I loved seeing her take them out on beach or with company over
What Girls & Guys Said
16 75Mixed feelings lol
Of course, they're arousing to look at. (i so recognise they have functions other than sexual titillation. But they're still a sexually enticing part of the female figure)
Yess definitely, they are very sexy due to them girl look more beautiful and make girls figure look more sexy.
No, human udders once you're given that mental image they stop being sexual
Until you consider the fact that udders, like all other mammal mammaries are exclusively present while a cow is lactating. Human mammaries are always present regardless of reproductive status. There is clearly no functional advantage to having two flabby lumps hanging off your chest, which leads us to assume, it has to be a sexual adaptation. Women with tits reproduced more despite the physical disadvantages tits bring them. Making tits a sexual organ. Evolved to attract mates.
Yes, because if they're exposed to me, it's usually when we're about to have sex.
Yes, they're sexual. At your age you should know better. Where ya been hiding all your life?
Definitely women's breasts. Men can get turned on by nipple play also though
I dont think so
I think so but I also think women being comfortable with their breast size is super attractive as well. If they aren't then in down to help them get comfortable because size isn't really an issue for me
The breasts, or mammary glands in mammals, are there to feed the offspring. That is one of many attributes of mammals in the animal kingdom. They have spines, they bear their young live, they have mammary glands to feed them, they have a way to regulate their temperature, etc and many others.
As a free bonus, God gave us heightened sensitivity- yes guys, in you too - - - not just the gals- in your breast's nipples as well. So, in His infinite wisdom, He made the breasts and nipples BOTH a nursing mechanism AND an arousal mechanism.
How fair and pleasant you are, O loved one, delectable maiden! You are stately as a palm tree, and your breasts are like its clusters. I say I will climb the palm tree and lay hold of its branches. Oh, may your breasts be like clusters of the vine, and the scent of your breath like apples, and your kisses like the best wine that goes down smoothly, gliding over lips and teeth. Excerpted from Song of Songs, Chapter 4
i find them "sexy", not inherently "sexual".
Yes, very much so, but they are cool because they also feed life. And they aren't sexual to me in that context. They play two roles.
Yes they feed life, but does it make it non sexual?
At the risk of hypersexualing women, I'm going to say that I think of every part if a woman's body as sexual in nature. If it has potential of bringing them, or myself, pleasure than I'm going to explore the idea.
Hyper-sexualizing
Of course they’re sexual
yeah
To be perfectly honest, no.
I absolutely do, though when the situation calls for it I can put my hormones on the back burner lol.
Yeah they are sexual, but they shouldn't be
I do. I loved seeing her take them out on beach or with company over
Mine aren't sexual but women's breasts are.
"Mine aren't sexual" tell that to gay and bi men
True