Given the fact that anal sex kills tens of thousands of people a year, should it be considered a public health threat?

Yes, that makes sense.
Vote A
No, just because an activity kills lots of people doesn't mean it's a public health threat.
Vote B
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Girl Guy
0 0

AI Bot Choice

Superb Opinion
  • How is that a "GIVEN"? Are you talking about the spread of HIV, or are you talking about something else? Don't post lies and BULLSHIT, without supporting links to the SCIENCE that shows some connection!!
    I am wondering is maybe you are just someone that hates Homosexuals!!

    • I am talking about AIDS.

    • You still didn't answer HOW Anal sex kills "tens of thousands of people a year", nor did you post any support for you presumptuous, post, that seems like a judgmental LIE and a reason to hate some people!

Most Helpful Guy

  • Maybe. If that were true. But on the other hand, how many people does alcohol, smoking, or driving kill each year? We don't consider those public health threats

    • Smoking is considered a public health threat though. It's discouraged.

    • Yeah that was a bad example. I'm still hung up on why you think anal sex is can be deadly

Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions

What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!

What Girls & Guys Said

0 15
  • No. Death only happens after the act is done. So as long as they do not pull back out, it should be legal.

  • First we have to outlaw guns, now we have to outlaw butts. What comes next after that?

  • It means we need to educate people on using condoms for this activity. It also means telling people if you have a sore, putting it in the butt is a death sentence. I think it is common sense, but that is just me.

  • being orbese and smoking kills way more people than anal. still Marlboro and Mc Donalds are a thing.

    • Yeah, and smoking and obesity are widely considered public health hazards. Generally, our society discourages people from smoking and getting fat. Should we at least discourage anal sex for the same reason?

    • I think there's already information about that out there that's pretty discouraging.

  • If that were true, then yes.

  • Given the fact that this isn't true, no

    • AIDS.

    • HIV can be transmitted via any type of unprotected sex. Anal sex not required

  • Lol, how so?

    • AIDS.

    • You don’t want anal don’t have anal.

  • Given the fact that anal sex kills tens of thousands of people a year, should it be considered a public health threat?
    • AIDS virus. It's serious. It's not a hoax.

  • Wait what, how does anal sex kill anyone? Unless you mean infections right

    • Yes, AIDS. It's like not wearing a mask during covid or owning a gun. Usually, those things don't kill you, but there is a small chance they could.

    • Yea so aids can be contracted from the pussy and the butt so in short anal sex doesn't kill people. It's aids

  • Given the fact that anal sex kills tens of thousands of people a year, should it be considered a public health threat?

    What?

    Stop reading the National Inquirer! Stop, just stop.

  • Whatever. Troll. Gtfo

  • I don't think that is true; but I wouldn't be surprised if the same people who support lockdowns/quarantining the healthy would support this if it was true.

  • ... Lemme guess... Those same number of people die from masturbation?

    • I don't think that is true...

  • That is false.

    Aids might do that but anal sex doesn't kill most people unless someone is assaulting them.

    • AIDS virus.

    • do you have tha anal virus?

  • Given the fact that you are a closeted homosexual who really just wants a dick in his ass, no.