- You have more energy
- Your interactions are less sexual/ it's easier to talk to both sexes
- Just the thought of a woman is enough to satisfy you
Im on that #NoNut, y'all ever tried it?
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
0 0
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!
What Girls & Guys Said
0 3I don’t call it “No Nut” but I’m nearly 2 years in it now haha. I have nothing against masturbating, I just don’t want to do it. It’s tempting sometimes but I’m happier not doing it for now.
Harvard study: "High ejaculation frequency was linked to a decreased risk. Compared to men who reported 4–7 ejaculations per month across their lifetimes, men who ejaculated 21 or more times a month enjoyed a 31% lower risk of prostate cancer."
You have more energy -- I am not lacking for energy now. I did 30km last weekend with an average of 38lbs on my back and I get up at 0400 every day.
Your interactions are less sexual/ it's easier to talk to both sexes -- I'm not "simple." I can talk to people. As an adult I have to do that regularly. How is basic human communication not easy?
Just the thought of a woman is enough to satisfy you -- I'm not sure how this is an appealing outcome. Certainly not with the tradeoff being higher rates of prostate cancer.
I know it's all subjective and anecdotal but the difference in energy between not ejaculating and ejaculating frequently, is night and day. It's so overt that it's hard to take seriously the discipline of science, the same 'science' that bought us all the covid bullshit. The same science that have most of the adult population in a state of perpetual medicalised sickness. Don't believe the prostate thing. Again, see my covid point. These institutions no longer have any credibility. I'd go far as to say that if one wishes to be healthy one should do the exact opposite of what they suggest.
They all say that stupid shit. Thats because healthier men WANT to nut more. Not because nutting makes you healthier.
Epidemiology is bullshit in general because it never infers a cause. It's all theoretical.
Well, I'd presume any good study would claim to look at those variables. But yes, anyone who has good social relationships and is fucking in general is bound to be healthier.
So theoretically I could lower (drastically) my risk of prostate cancer at the expense of having more energy, which is something I don't need. Seems an easy choice, but you do you I guess.
You can't tell me the men who aren't nutting aren't nutting because they're sexually discipline. Those are men who are obese and have no sex drive to begin with.
The only way you can truly "look at those variables" is to look at the mechanism. Why would nutting more than is necessary lower prostate cancer risk? Surveys isn't science, sorry.
Ok so it may or may not lower cancer risks... we'll go with that but if you're saying the benefit is more energy which I don't need because I'm not a lazy ass, where's my incentive to abstain?
Weird question when I wrote a whole post about it
Yes and I already addressed those three "benefits" in my first post. Two are non-issues and the the other is just made up.
Have no time for your meat head shit. I can sense it man. You're disgusting!
Haha sure thing boss. Enjoy your celibacy and finding it "easier to talk to both sexes" like that's some sort of accomplishment.
You have no clue what I mean by easier. I mean it's magical. It's seductive It's on another level. It's an energy that changes lives.
Yeah I'm not trying to change lives with my coworker after the office party, but like I said man, you do you. I'm happy you're getting what you want.
Wanking is a waste of time for a cheap orgasm.
I'd rather have sex with a woman, or do nothing at all.
I don't want to get religious about it. But I've definitely experienced what you say.
However, if I was your age I wouldn't worry about that. Just go out and fuck and enjoy your sexuality.
The main issue is porn and just wanking rather than going out and meeting women. That's where the danger lies for men.