I didn't have a choice as mine was done not long after birth.
0000
Nachowedgie
+1 y
I feel bad for you
ColeBrighton2Xper 5
+1 y
It’s a pretty common practice in the USA, I’m not super sold on the benefits of doing it but I can see the reasoning behind certain parents doing it
0000
LorraineGatesXper 3
+1 y
All my boys are cut like their father.
2100
ErinMumford
+1 y
are your boys happy with it?
Jaumet
+1 y
Not her boy, but I am... funny thing my father is not and he insisted that I be... Besides, it was done at birth and I have not know anything different... other than the CDC saying it does reduce the chance of contracting an STD! Hell, look it up!
Andy79Xper 2
+1 y
Sexually i think not be circumcised. It gives more pleasure
1100
TheEbonyEnchantress
+1 y
I approve this message
ErinMumford
+1 y
my family is all cut. how much extra sensitivity does uncut have?
Andy79
+1 y
I am cut too, but I can tell that uncut is more sensual to partner. I am bisexual and I already noticed the difference
Show All Show Less
TheEbonyEnchantress
+1 y
I have had sex with both cut and uncut men and it's more fun with uncut
Andy79
+1 y
@TheEbonyEnchantress thanks for this information, I asked many girls and they agree with us
sp33dGuru
+1 y
Afaik, there are some conditions that are treated with circumcision. But then circumcision at very early age would mean it is prophylactic. I don't support that idea.
0000
JackofSpadesExplorer
+1 y
I was, and no hard feelings towards my parents or anything, but I'm not doing it to any son of mine.
0000
oldermaleYoda
+1 y
Im circumsized and think its looks better.
0000
jahaimsMaster
+1 y
No, genital mutilation isn't a good choice.
0100
Dayman343Xper 7
+1 y
It's a disgusting and unnecessary practice that should be outlawed
0100
Aiko_E_LaraMaster
+1 y
I personally think it's I good decision I made because it does feel better being cut than uncut but I don't think guys "should". I would just give them the choice if they want to.
1100
Aiko_E_Lara
+1 y
I love how everyone is assuming it's a baby the question is talking about when it's not even mentioned.
Paulychicago10Yoda
+1 y
Mine looks good
1000
msc545Master
+1 y
Hell no - it's mutilation.
0100
EaterPeterGuru
+1 y
Not sure
0000
grega239Guru
+1 y
No. Butchering a little boy is never a good choice
2200
grega239
+1 y
It's also illegal in my country because it's a violation of human rights.
NYlatefunYoda
+1 y
There are no real benefits for circumcised men, and there are negative effects for doing it, so def not.
0000
more_than_a_guyYoda
+1 y
Far less chances of infections or STI recieving/transmitting.
0004
bones0271
+1 y
There is actually no scientific evidence to support that theory
Nachowedgie
+1 y
"Far less chances of infections or STI recieving/transmitting" Completely false, it has the exact opposite effect
There is a surgical risk, and that's why it's recommended by authorized doctor, and not some regular rabbi or such...
Show All Show Less
bones0271
+1 y
You reduce sti by not having sex with some that has an sti
bones0271
+1 y
Plus other governments in the world like in Canada and Denmark claim that the United States experiments were fraud and done poorly
bones0271
+1 y
On the website for health Canada the government claims that there is no evidence to believe that it is beneficial
bones0271
+1 y
The US hospitals just want people to get circumcised because they sell the foreskin for over 100,000 us dollars per piece
bones0271
+1 y
In some countries that has been banned so there is no bias. A number of studies done in Denmark destroy the US study to show that their is no difference in regards to sti
SeppelYoda
+1 y
It's in of the worst things in the world. I would never do that
1100
Turtleneck22Xper 6
+1 y
It’s a choice left the the person.
0200
jimmy2Master
+1 y
Yes it help on health issues
0004
Nachowedgie
+1 y
No it doesn't
NachowedgieGuru
+1 y
Is genital mutilation a good choice you mean. No, no it fucking isn't
What Girls & Guys Said
10 51I didn't have a choice as mine was done not long after birth.
I feel bad for you
It’s a pretty common practice in the USA, I’m not super sold on the benefits of doing it but I can see the reasoning behind certain parents doing it
All my boys are cut like their father.
are your boys happy with it?
Not her boy, but I am... funny thing my father is not and he insisted that I be... Besides, it was done at birth and I have not know anything different... other than the CDC saying it does reduce the chance of contracting an STD! Hell, look it up!
Sexually i think not be circumcised. It gives more pleasure
I approve this message
my family is all cut. how much extra sensitivity does uncut have?
I am cut too, but I can tell that uncut is more sensual to partner. I am bisexual and I already noticed the difference
I have had sex with both cut and uncut men and it's more fun with uncut
@TheEbonyEnchantress thanks for this information, I asked many girls and they agree with us
Afaik, there are some conditions that are treated with circumcision. But then circumcision at very early age would mean it is prophylactic. I don't support that idea.
I was, and no hard feelings towards my parents or anything, but I'm not doing it to any son of mine.
Im circumsized and think its looks better.
No, genital mutilation isn't a good choice.
It's a disgusting and unnecessary practice that should be outlawed
I personally think it's I good decision I made because it does feel better being cut than uncut but I don't think guys "should". I would just give them the choice if they want to.
I love how everyone is assuming it's a baby the question is talking about when it's not even mentioned.
Mine looks good
Hell no - it's mutilation.
Not sure
No. Butchering a little boy is never a good choice
It's also illegal in my country because it's a violation of human rights.
There are no real benefits for circumcised men, and there are negative effects for doing it, so def not.
Far less chances of infections or STI recieving/transmitting.
There is actually no scientific evidence to support that theory
"Far less chances of infections or STI recieving/transmitting" Completely false, it has the exact opposite effect
@bones0271 scholar.google.com/scholar
There is a surgical risk, and that's why it's recommended by authorized doctor, and not some regular rabbi or such...
You reduce sti by not having sex with some that has an sti
Plus other governments in the world like in Canada and Denmark claim that the United States experiments were fraud and done poorly
On the website for health Canada the government claims that there is no evidence to believe that it is beneficial
The US hospitals just want people to get circumcised because they sell the foreskin for over 100,000 us dollars per piece
In some countries that has been banned so there is no bias. A number of studies done in Denmark destroy the US study to show that their is no difference in regards to sti
It's in of the worst things in the world. I would never do that
It’s a choice left the the person.
Yes it help on health issues
No it doesn't
Is genital mutilation a good choice you mean. No, no it fucking isn't