." target="_blank" rel="nofollow">https://www.aglp.org/gap/1_history/>.
“How Is OCD Treated?" International OCD Foundation. 28 Apr. 2014. Web. 11 Feb. 2015. <https://iocdf.org/about-ocd/treatment/>.
"In D.C. Schools, Gay-tolerance Lessons Are Becoming Elementary." Washington Post. The Washington Post, 4 Feb. 2012. Web. 11 Feb. 2015. <https://www.washingtonpost.com/ local/education/in-dc-schools-gay-tolerance-lessons-are-becoming-elementary/ 2012/01/29/gIQA8YLFqQ_story.html>.
1st problem: " According to the Oxford Dictionary, normal is defined as: “The usual, average, or typical state or condition”. Multiple studies... found about 3.5% of the population belongs to the LGBT population. So if we use the official definition for normal, homosexuals are far from normal."
An event can have a low probability of occurring, but if it consistently occurs, it's still normal. Take having red hair- it's not common, but it's still normal because it regularly occurs due to the laws of genetics. As long as that 3.5% is consistent across generations, being LGBT is normal, just rare.
2nd problem: "Homosexuality doesn’t contribute to evolution since it discourages reproduction". I wouldn't bet on that. You need to consider that populations can be more important than individuals. To quote the BBC, one theory is "kin selection or the "helper in the nest" hypothesis. The idea is that gay people compensate for their lack of children by promoting the reproductive fitness of brothers or sisters, contributing money or performing other activities such as babysitting or tutoring. Some of the gay person's genetic code is shared with nieces and nephews and so the genes which code for sexual orientation still get passed down."
3rd problem: "By definition, pedophillia should be classified as a sexual orientation." That doesn't make any sense, because children are still male or female.
4th problem: "we can infer that the removal of homosexuality from the DSM was brought on in direct correlation to protesting. No new discoveries or breakthroughs were made to cause this change, it was solely due to protesting." Protesting is also what led to the abolition of slavery. Plus, you also don't consider the simple hypothesis that shrinks realized that they were wrong.
5th problem: "Homosexuals are protesting and fighting current laws against gay marriage. however, no recent breakthroughs or discoveries have been made in recent years, but still, more and more countries continue to legalize and accept a condition, that 50 years ago with the same knowledge we have now would be in the same category as pedophillia." You obviously don't know what a null hypothesis is. Look it up.
More evidence that you don't understand what a null hypothesis is: "Public schools are making this more difficult to accomplish because they beginning to teach our children that homosexuality is normal"
You got a 95% on this POS? OMG.
It's a well written paper and I'd give it a 'good' grade.
However, you lost objectivity comparing homosexuality to OCD and concluding from that parallel " I think we should be able to increase the quality of life for that population by creating treatments so they can lead a more normal life."
That's why I'd only grade it 'good', not 'excellent'. :)
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!I give you a negative 78% because you started off the paper with a single word sentence.
thankssssssssss
It's good enough quality that I'd wipe my ass with it, but not really good enough that I'd lick the shit off afterwards.
haha nice one
A couple of things bother me:
1. This reeks of standard HS writing with no voice
2. There are no in text citations
3. The vocabulary feels like you're forcing a sense of intelligence.. which doesn't come as so.
Onto the actual subject:
1. We are waaay beyond the point of needing to reproduce so actually the Gay community is helping that issue.
2. Comparing bisexuality to pedophillia. So just a question. How does me wanting to lick and eat a vagina compare to me wanting to molest a child who does not know what's happening and has about 0 maturity. Not even close to the same and is rather insulting.
3. If gays are un-natural, why aren't we viewing those with DDLG, foot, BDSM, latex, leather, anal, pegging, or whatever fetish as horrible too? I mean but it's okay since they're straight right? How about this - I don't care where you put your dick and you don't care what I put my mouth on.
I would call it _sub_standard HS writing.
psuedo-science..
it doesn't cause dysfunction.
Holy shit, your brain stayed in the 50's didn't it?
thanks for sharing your feedback :)
I hate this whole gay thing.
Sorry, I have my opinion.
I hate how people are still talking about it.
Hitler had his own opinion about gays as well. And if you "hate this whole gay thing", then why on earth are you using a computer? Alan Turing was gay.
@JenSCDC this is old as fuck get a life
Quite biased and lame
Not to mention displaying a distinct lack of critical thinking.
Very well written and searched!
Glad to hear there's still sensible people out there
Exactly!
If you believe that, you must have gone to a college as bad as the one that a) actually considered it as acceptable for a senior thesis and b) gave it a 95%.
Most Helpful Girl