Is it sexist that women have to cover their secondary sexual characteristics like nipples but men do not have to cover any secondary sexual traits?

[Anonymous]

Read the details about secondary sexual characteristics before saying a nonsense, and please dont use insults, otherwise i may delete your post! This topic is very misunderstood, this is why it is important that you read the facts about secondary sexual characteristics.

"Secondary sexual characteristics are those sexually dimorphic characteristics that are not directly involved in reproduction.
For males, secondary characteristics include facial and chest hair, increased body hair, pelvic build, upper body muscular build, and the ability to generate muscle mass at a faster rate than the female.
For females, secondary sex characteristics include thicker hair on the head (in some cases), rounded hips/figure, a decreased ability to generate muscle mass at a fast rate, decreased upper body strength, breasts, a menstrual cycle, and increased body fat composition."

Sources:
www.sciencedirect.com/.../secondary-sexual-characteristics

You can look up any other sources too like en.m.wikipedia.org/.../Secondary_sex_characteristic

So i am just just curious about people who dont want women to show their nipples but dont have a problem if a man show his body hair etc. Scientificically it does not make sense that women have to cover it while men dont. So scientific/biological facts dont give a f about your feelings. You are just against women showing nipples but have no problem with men showing their secondary sexual traits because you dont know a shit about biology or you are just sexist. I personally think everyone should cover their nipples lol

[Valnac]

I wish we lived in a society where we could all go out nude.
It would be easier for women to pick their mate.

[BrianMarks]

Unfortunately one of the hallmarks of socialism And feminism is creating laws based on groups of people rather than allowing more individual freedoms. That leads to examples like the one you cite. A more democratic society would remove these laws and allow citizens of all groups more individual freedoms in daily life.

[GAGSucksBalls1]

boobs, technically aren't sexual

they're meant for breast feeding

men and women, just make it sexual

[MrCreep]

It's diffrent cause if women did men would have even more reason to touch or more the same thing don't go the outher way does it

[Asker]

These men are potential rapists/sexual harrasser. No sane man would do such a thing to women even if she is naked. Wtf. You are just insulting normal men

[MrCreep]

Yes with alcohol and female most men are dogs if none of these so called normal men do nothing to stop a dog it will do what it wants to any lady. It's sick didn't you know rape and stuff it's common now with people like you acting like it's not nothing to worry about its so much they don't even arrest a lot of sex offenders now don't you care at all?

[Asker]

Men are normal people. Sane men dont hurt anyone. Stop insulting men.

[MrCreep]

You think people who know a girl getting raped and do nothing cause they scared to get smashed up by a group of guys or one sicko are sane. You int right in the head your basically saying it's ok to let women get raped if a guy looks normal to you?

[Asker]

No you stupid idiot. No normal sane man would rape a girl. What has that to do with looking normal. Are you saying you would rape/harrass women when they are nude? I am just saying nobody should be harrassed/raped just because they are nude