A pack of condoms is like 5 bucks? Hell some bars just give them out for free.
Pretty fucking stupid to risk changing your life forever or at least 18 years, plus who knows how many thousands of dollars just to save 5 bucks now.
Oh and would be good to avoid catching any studs a random stranger may have.0 0 0 0
Most Helpful Guy
At times. I did that when I was sexually active in my teens, 20's and 30's and confess I only wore a rubber on two occasions, once in college with a girl I hooked up with in night school, and once with a girl that I had only fucked a few times.
I don't know if "lucky" or what. Pre-ejaculate has viable sperm in it, and I always had plenty in those years, but YES for me, 'withdrawal' was a successful BC for me during those times.
0 0 0 0
Most Helpful Girls
It’s 77% effective. So it’s fairly effective but you wouldn’t want to use it as everyday birth control. Only a matter of time before you fall on that 23% side.
0 0 0 077% effective is not "fairly effective". It means it's a disaster. It means that most people got pregnant after 3-4 times of doing it. And 23% of people got pregnant the first time. It's a disaster, don't do it.
@PenkWing No it doesn’t mean that at all. It means 23 out of 100 couples will typically become pregnant after a year of using the method. Many couples go years before having a failure. When someone posts a question like this, the least we can do is give accurate information.
My bad. You're absolutely right., thank you. I was in a hurry to reject the idea that pulling out is "fairly effective". But it was absolutely dumb of me to write that people "get pregnant" that often. I cannot delete the first comment, but I'll do what I can to rectify. Therefore I sat down and read the science. It's messy.
The source of the most commonly quoted figure of 23% is a 1991 publication https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(11)90581-X This 23% is interpreted exactly as you said: an estimate of the probability of pregnancy after one year of typical use of the practice. It is estimated using the so-called life table method, as part of a clinical trial which followed 869 women in different countries for varying amounts of times. IMPORTANT: the study was on the ovulation method, NOT simply "pulling out". The couples involved in the clinical trial were taught extensively how to use the method (predicting the fertility cycle and following some rules) to prevent pregnancy. In total, couples who violated some or all rules had a failure rate which was similar to not using a prevention method at all (84%). On the other side of the spectrum, when the method was followed perfectly failure rate was as low as 2.1%.
It works out good when mixed with the fertility awareness method
0 0 0 0
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!Related Questions
What Girls & Guys Said
1 7No! This is a joke question, right?
0 0 0 0Amazing. 2022 and still asking this 🤦🏾♀️
1 2 0 0I would not trust that method.
0 0 0 0No because the pre - ejaculate fluid leaking out of the penis still contains trace semen even before the main ejaculation. That’s just my opinion. 🙂
0 0 0 0yes. if you like accidental unplanned pregnancies, it is.
0 0 0 0If you're sterile.
0 0 0 0Only an idiot believes in the pull out method. I think 3 of my friends had kids because they thought pulling out works
0 0 0 0It's consistently rated as the worst form of contraception and preganancy rates from using only this method are close to those of people trying to become pregnant.
0 0 0 0
AI Bot Choice
Superb Opinion