
Is women walking around with their underboobs showing the equivalent to men walking around with their balls hanging out?

Select gender and age to cast your vote:
0 1
No, it is not. It'd be more like a guy walking around with no sleeves on. And a woman wearing just her bra or showing cleavage would be like a guy walking round without a shirt on. I don't approve of either one, but people do it all the time.
I’m a lot happier to see underboob than I am to see some dude’s giggleberries
No, balls hanging out is worse because that’s a more intimate area. Underboob isn’t even as bad as showing nipples.
No, but the wording of the question gave me a good chuckle. Good on you for that.
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!I believe it's equivalent to muscular fellas walking around without a shirt.
Surely the equivalent to a guy walking around without a shirt is a girl walking around without a shirt?
@StephBelsten I didn't say that, I said it was equivalent to girl walking around with "underboob" shirt, not shirtless.
I know that's my point. How is a guy walking around shirtless any different from a girl walking around shirtless? It's the same thing, both sexes have nipples, the female equivalent shouldn't be seen as more taboo
No boobs are the equivalent of men's chest.
Vaginas are the equivalent of men's penis.
Normalize women walking topless in public if they choose.
I don't see any thing wrong we see the top all the time I think it nice to see the other bits
You’re right, it’s really not that different from cleavage.
haha. 100% of guys say no
Nah. Women being able to go topfree everywhere guys can would be better.
booba
I don't think so. Girls enjoy seeing a pair of shaved balls a lot more than guys enjoy seeing women's breasts. People usually get more turned on by seeing someone's genitals. Breasts are not genitals.
Obviously not
AI Bot Choice
Superb Opinion