Love vs. Lust: Whatever You Do, Don't Confuse the Two


Love vs. Lust: Whatever You Do, Don't Confuse the Two

I recently watched a candid one-on-one interview with the late great Gene Wilder. The interview, conducted by Alec Baldwin (who I don't particularly like, but he was great for this), touched on Wilder's personal life and his relationships. At one point, Baldwin asked Wilder if he'd ever fallen in love with somebody he worked with. Wilder replied- "Fallen in love or fallen in lust? Because there's a difference."

And he's right. Despite the standard stereotype that men don't "feel," or at least don't have as much sentiment as women, intelligent, civilized men are well aware of the difference between love and lust. The problem is, I think the general emotional IQ of both girls and guys has fallen precipitously in the past decade or so (thank you, internet), resulting in young individuals supposedly in the primes of their lives, who are unfortunately terrified of their own shadows. Social anxiety has skyrocketed and trust me, the reason is entirely environmental. Get the hell outside and interact with people and I guarantee you'll fix yourself.

Love vs. Lust: Whatever You Do, Don't Confuse the Two

But I'm off on a bit of a tangent here. The point, though I've taken too long to reach it, is that young guys and girls are frequently confusing love and lust. Teens and those in their 20s have always confused it to some extent, of course (these are complex experiences, after all) but now it's worse than ever. Confusing sex for love is a big mistake everybody, not merely one gender, appears to be making at every turn. In the movie "Roxanne" (Steven Martin, Daryl Hannah), Roxanne asks her friend if she ever confused sex for love. The response was, "I did that once...it was great." Of course, the friend in question was kinda the type who'd sleep with anything that moves, which is sort of my point.

You can confuse lust for love, and very easily if the sex is fantastic. But even if the lust magically sticks around for a while (and it usually doesn't), time will inevitably kill it. Okay, not kill it, but there's no chance your desire for each other will be the same at 65 as it is at 25. You just have to accept that time will have its unfortunate consequences and at some point, sex will not become the most important thing in your life, and not even the most important aspect of your relationship. One could argue that this advice only counts for people seeking long-term commitments, but don't forget one other important fact:

While love can lead to intimate, wonderfully fulfilling relationships, lust can't result in the same connection and hence, isn't capable of being as emotionally fulfilling.

Love vs. Lust: Whatever You Do, Don't Confuse the Two

I've seen people get married because the attraction to each other was just overpowering. They even admitted their relationship was based on lust as opposed to love. Unsurprisingly, these relationships ultimately failed because...well, for obvious reasons. Why they didn't see it, I'll never know. Well, I sort of know because I know how powerful lust and desire can be, especially when you're young and insanely horny every second of the day. At that point, if you find someone who you really click with in the bedroom, your silly immature brain is screaming at you to stick with that person forever. Doesn't matter if s/he's a drug using psychopath; you still want that great sex. It makes everything foggy.

Yes, I'm well aware. But eventually, the fog will clear and you'll be left wondering why you're alone. Again. Obviously, the key is to find someone that satisfies both parameters here - love and lust - but the real tragedy occurs when you mistake one for the other. Honestly, you can waste a big portion of your life if you fall into this trap, so I'm just sending out this friendly PSA. :)

16 15

Most Helpful Guy

  • 1. I'm with you on the disdain for Alec Baldwin. He is far too pretentious and arrogant.

    2. Women consistently underestimate the emotional needs of men because men consistently understate their emotional needs. Guys who want a close relationship want sex early on because, in their mind, it brings people closer together, and they want the closeness, trust, intimacy. . . in addition to the sex. But ladies think that guys JUST want to get laid.

    3. The difference between being in lust and being in love is easy to define. If I am in lust, I think about how good a girl could make me feel. If I am in love, I think about how good I would hope to make her feel, as well as how good she would make me feel. If I'm in lust, I think about how to get her in bed but then how to get her to go home afterwards. If I am in love, I think about how to get her to stay.

    4. The social anxiety/detachment/anhedonia problem comes not just from the internet but from the digital age. Cell phones allow people to say "I like you, let's spend time together" by text rather than in person or in a voice call. When they break up, more often now it's a text rather than a discussion, or a change of status on Facebook. My consistent advice to young people is to get off of the texting/FB/media and go talk to the opposite sex. You get confidence by experience actually interacting and nothing digital counts in that regard.

    5. "There's no chance your desire for each other will be the same at 65 as it is at 25." My libido has not diminished as I have gotten older but I have also not engage in casual sexual relationships. My current girlfriend knows what it means when I say I don't want to stay up late watching a movie!

    6. You are absolutely right; no amount of lust cannot substitute for love in a relationship. Lust can make you feel good for minutes, sometimes for hours, but love will make you feel great for the rest of your life!

    • Guys who want a close relationship want sex early on because, in their mind, it brings people closer together, and they want the closeness, trust, intimacy. . . in addition to the sex. But ladies think that guys JUST want to get laid. To be honest that what I actually think. I had that happen to me be before. I liked the guy because of his personality and I thought he was funny. But he said "I get what I want" and that really pissed me off. I really felt like he was going too fast and all he wanted was sex.

    • @Gigglebox_95 I should have said that guys who want a serious relationship want sex early on to become even closer. Of course, there are also guys who want sex early on because they only want to get laid.

    • Okay gotcha, but with the latter, I find that totally sad. Just to get laid...

    • Show All

Most Helpful Girl

  • Don't take this the wrong way, but, this sounds like a valiant -- and, I'll hand it to you, cleverly crafted -- effort from someone who realizes, with a heavy heart, that she/he had all that beautiful animalistic lust with one of The Ones Who Got Away, and will never feel that feeling again.

    It's... kinda like a love-equivalent of hearing a 40-year-old say "Oh, those young whippersnappers, with all of their ephemeral concerns about... **staying in physical shape**. What a silly fleeting youthful thing to be concerned with" -- before digging into a whole bacchanalia of pizza and beer.

    Y'know?

    Dude... I'm one of those girls who only falls in love horizontally. And, to KEEP falling in love over and over and over again... I better spend a big, big fraction of my life horizontal. And I ain't talking about sleeping.

    I mean, I suppose I'm sort of like the "drug-using psychopath" you wrote about, except MY drug is carnal pleasure, and all the lovely tension that leads up to it.
    Get complacent about that?
    "Grow comfortable" together?
    Ugh, I'd very literally rather die.

    My connection with my husband -- like every other longish relationship I've had (all of them good ones, despite my struggling with VERY severe bipolar disorder) -- started out as blinding lust, and we built it from there. It's now 17 years later, we've been married for 15.5 years, and that lust hasn't done anything but get even hotter.

    __

    I mean, I suppose you may be right still, though. Maybe it'll all go south after, like, 28.6 years. hahahah.

    By that point, I'd certainly say it'd have been Worth It.

    • i agree with you, lady

    • I realize nothing of the sort and for the record, I take great pride in the fact that I'm in vastly better condition than most of the "young whippersnappers" I see wandering around, many of whom look soft and pitiful to me. I can rip through the 10K meters (about 6.3 miles) in under 39 minutes and my barbells are 65 lbs. and 55 lbs. respectively. The "young whippersnappers" who think they can arm wrestle don't want to deal with me. ;) But that's sort of the point. I'm getting older and before I know it, I won't be able to do any of this, or at least nowhere near as well. I don't believe animal lust has disappeared at all and I'm certainly not against it. But I only connect with people on the deepest possible levels when I'm NOT horizontal, and those have proven to be the most rewarding relationships for me. And as I get older, they only become that much more rewarding.

    • By the way, that time is in rowing, not running. I hate to run. :P

    • Show All

Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions

What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!

What Girls & Guys Said

26 39
  • I think I may have confused something more for pure drunken lust, but most of the time I can tell the difference. Either way, this is the only one that mattered. I've never felt either, but I've had guys both lust after and fall in love with me.

  • Interesting article, but it's true there's a big difference between love and lust. Lust dose'nt last long and it can be a waste of time because after a while it becomes shallow, just fleeting. It has no depths, no emotional connection to it. Then again I'm an old soul with a young heart. So contradicting . SMH

  • Interesting take. Gene Wilder and Gilda Radner's love story is one that even goes beyond Hollywood's best and enduring love stories. Looking at Gene Wilder and the relationship he had with wife Gilda Radner really is the illustration of what really love is. He was so in love with Gilda that when she died way too early, his heart was so broken and probably always was. Even closest friends wondered if his carrer as a humorist was died with Gilda. Gene busied himself with causes to keep Gilda Radner's name remembered, ultimately this is what Gene Wilder himself credited as helping himself back to being and thinking funny again. One can definitely tell the difference in his work before the love of his life died and after.
    I appreciate old movies and some of Hollywood's true love stories. Every time I see the story of Gene Wilder and Gilda Radner on stations like Turner Classic Movies and others it makes me cry. Other Hollywood Couples like Humphry Bogart and Lauren Bacall, Tom Hanks and Rita Wilson as well as very few others. Illustrate inspirational real life love stories, with happiness and hardship that rival any script Hollywood has ever come up with.

    • Well, according to the interview, the love of his life was the woman he married after Gilda, and that she's the perfect embodiment of love for him. Most people outside of Hollywood don't seem to know that. :)

  • This is a very interesting article, and it has me thinking... This applies not solely for sexual lust, but just as much the lust for the prospect of a relationship, a future with the guy that ticks all the boxes and makes you look good in social circles. That kind of lust can be just as overpowering. Love makes you blind, sure, but so does lust. The question is, how do you know the difference? I, myself, have had crushes, I have thought I was in love, when I was merely infatuated with the idea of the other person. Right now, at the age of 20, I think I might be on the road to a destination called love for the very first time, but I can't be sure. Having only media depictions of what real love should/could/might look like, along with intel from friends and family, I can get rather confused about my feelings. They all say you "just know" but how can I trust myself if I'm so easily deceived? Lust feels like hunger, and disguises itself in desperation for love. The idea of love is addictive... I wonder how many people are fooling themselves, and I fear I might become one.

  • I'm done with love and lust... the KEY... is friendship <3 Actually... I might unleash the bi girl in me and be with a girl for awhile!!

    • But that's pretty much what love is isn't it? A mixture of friendship and lust.

    • @jarofawesome hmmm

  • A big part of issue is our language. I love pizza, I love my dog, I love my mom and I have a love of my life. All very different, but we only have one word. If you both say I love you, you still don't know what the other person means.

    Most other languages and many words for the differences in love.

  • Lust can be terrrible. But it can lead to noice things :> and feelings too

  • Thank you for that. Great article to point many GAG questions to for an answer.

  • Exactly! And this is why "Love at first sight" doesn't exist.

  • Yes, it's better not to confuse them. But mainly because, as a general rule, it's better not being confused.
    I don't think mistakenly seeing lust as love will change your relationship's success chances. Not only lust can lead to love, but also love can turn in so many other things.
    IMHO the problem with lust is it leads to early sex with someone you don't really love. And that's not even bad in itself. But is usually something you'll regret later on.

  • Well written informative mytake. I guess one moral of this story is take your time in getting to know someone and don't jump to lustful conclusions of love everlasting.

    • I agree.

  • Love this. Now enough people understand it.


  • Lust is awful. it had me in an awful situation with a fuckboy for years. Thankfully, I got the strength to leave

  • So in essence, Love and Lust has a symbiotic relationship?

    • Bullshit So if I feel strong sexual desire for my husband then it is lust not love?

    • @Amlal as in there's not much beyond that sexual desire. Like, if you didn't feel the need to fuck him, would you still like him? The answer would probably be yes

    • I really laughed at the last column and and last row.

    • Show All
  • Lust can result in love so meh

    • Sure it can. It did with my man. We started dating purely because of a strong sexual attraction. Both came from long term broken relationships so we weren't wanting anything serious. But we could help but fall in love because we got to know each other and became best friends as well as great lovers. We RealizeD we had so much in common and just loved being around each other. We now plan to spend our life together. The thing is if we were only in lust with each other then we would have broke up when his stress disorder put a damper on our sex life to where we don't have it as much. Life is full of surprises and I'm thankful for the love and lust we have for each other.

    • Lol. Sorry. I thought you said it can't result in love. My bad. :)

  • Very well written and I hop it opens the eyes of some who do confuse the two

  • This is perfect. A lot of relationships i see people having are surface-based. What i mean by that is the relationship is based on looks, material items one has, their "popularity" status, etc. It's like a diamond. The look of the diamond can be beyond beautiful at first glance, and is something you think you want. As time goes on, the sight doesn't pleasure your senses as much as it used to, and the meaning behind the diamond will arise... Exactly like a relationship. Try to find out what you want in an amazing relationship before it happens.

  • I really enjoyed this and agree with every point. Great job!

  • Show More (45)