Men today need to chill out. Women have too much sexual power over the sexual marketplace. Let’s talk about it.

[Robertcw]

I cannot believe what’s happening today in the United States. Among people aged 18-29 28% of men have not had a single sexual encounter in the past year, compared to just 18% of women in 2018-2019 according to study conducted by the University of Chicago and the NHIS.

Compared to previous polls, starting in 2008 the number of sexless men has risen almost exponentially while the number of sexless women has remained constant.

Lets talk about this.

How can this happen?

This can can only happen when supply is far less than demand, in this situation suppliers can choose whoever they wish to sell to extremely selectively because there are more people who want a good than goods are available.

Consider elite colleges. Say, Stanford. Stanford has the lowest acceptance rate in the United States at 4.7%, or thereabouts. How can they afford to admit so few of their applicants?

1). They only have 2000 available seats and they have around 45,000 applicants. That’s 22.5x as many applicants as available seats.

2) Their reputation is so high among students and the general public that their yield rate is exceedingly high, one of the highest in the nation above 80% yield. This means, of the students Stanford chooses, it can be very confident nearly all of them will accept their offer of admission.

Let’s double back to the sexual marketplace today. 20 year old women are at peak fertility and are scientifically demonstrably the most desirable age demographic to men — this has been shown over and over. But, anywhere from 18-34 is also highly fertile and so highly attractive.

Now, let’s compare women and sex to Stanford admissions.

1). Since all men are attracted to women in this age demographic, there are far more applicants than there are available women.

2). Since men are biologically programmed to desire sex 24/7 or basically at any opportunity, these girls can feel very confident that their yield rates will be above 80%, just like Stanford.

This means, if 20 guys hit on a girl, she can be over 80% confident that of the 20, anyone of them will choose her if she chooses them after he ‘applies’ by making his interest known.

As a result, extreme selectivity can happen. Is it a rate 4.6% or 4.7% acceptance? Who knows. That’s not actually important. Only the principle matters.

So, we’ve defined a difficult situation. What’s the solution?

How can we increase the acceptance rate at Stanford?

First let’s realize that the college will be exactly the same regardless of admissions one year or another. Faculty are all the same, programs are all the same, courses are all the same. But if less students applied, and all high school students coordinated a strategic application strategy in which only a few applied to Stanford, a few to Columbia, and few to Pomona, well then suddenly Stanford needs to accept a lot more students.

Lets say only 3000 applied to Stanford one year. Well then they need to fill 2000 spots, so that would be a 67% acceptance rate. That’s way different than 4.7%.

Men, we can do the same thing. If we chill out and stop aggressively pursuing everything that walks with boobs then we can reduce the number of applicants. Flirt with them, sure. But do so with the idea that you don’t need to sleep with them pronto. This would allow for higher acceptance rates for all men, to go around.

The idea is to reduce demand across the board, even among the hottest guys, in order to devalue supply.

So, why am I saying this? It sounds kinda sexist and fucked up, right?

Well, besides the rising statistic, two things happened to me today. The same very day.

One, I got this message on Tinder from a match:

Selling nudes on Snapchat.

This is actually the second time this has happened to me, I wrote about another separate instance of this in an answer I wrote for Quora.

Girls go online knowing there are a bunch of sexless men to prey on and then charge cash for naked photos of themselves, meanwhile they date regularly. Often they want to charge $20. Or it might be a subscription fee of $20 a month or whatever they say it is if you play along.

Of course, I actually didn’t send her a message on Tinder and she knows it. She’s making up an excuse to message me first with the implication to sell me nude photos without saying that.

But believe it or not something else happened to me today at lunch. I was in a cafeteria at my college at this group of three people were sitting around chatting when this girl who looked like a sophomore suddenly brought up how a class of hers required her to make a Twitter, and that she considered changing the name and soliciting nude photos for cash. She even joked about accepting credit cards.

The guy agreed, citing how a friend of his made insane amounts of money doing this very thing. Like what the fuck is happening?

Young girls are sitting around selling nudes on the internet because nearly 30% of men their age have a dry spell of over one year. Like, holy shit?!

I can’t be the only one who sees alarm bells going off here. Around my campus I see guys that are clearly not going to get laid anytime soon, and already in week 2 of classes, it seems ‘in groups’ have already been formed. Week one was the only chance to make it to the right party or social gathering — and that time has passed. All the people who missed out are SOL as FWB’s have been formed already.

I don’t know about you all, but I think men in general need to chill the fuck out and try making platonic friendships instead of pursuing skirts all day. We have given women as a whole way too much power in the sexual marketplace. The best solution is to reduce demand across the board and chillax. Then maybe we’ll see women want to meet real guys instead of try and sell them nudes. No joke.

[Anonymous]

Who cares about men they are pigs