Sexual Relationships 
Sexual Health 
Surveys show that most men want women to be drafted, but most women do not.
As a note, I am against the draft in general. I am against warfare in general. However, if there does have to be a draft, it should only be men, because women already have so much shit to deal with. Including women in the draft would be inequality because it would be placing a double burden upon women that men do not have to deal with.
Women are the ones who give birth to men. Almost every single man alive - whether he goes to war or does not - is here because a woman risked her life going through the sacrifice of giving birth to him. It’s only fair that men protect women in return after all the sacrifices women make so that men can even be alive. Like Teddy Roosevelt said, “The birth pangs make men debtors of women.” Men shouldn’t be allowed to force women to make any more sacrifices (especially considering they were the ones who started these wars in the first place.) Women have done enough for men.
As for women who don’t give birth, even women who don’t have children have to deal with the fact that their bodies are the ones wired with the capability for childbirth, and all the disadvantages that come with that, whereas men don’t. Menstruation etc which has been proven by researchers to sometimes be as painful as a heart attack: https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/period-pain-is-officially-as-bad-as-a-heart-attack-so-why-have-doctors-ignored-it-the-answer-is-a6883831.html For literally a week each month for over 30 years straight. All so that cis men can have children someday.
Many men obviously do not appreciate all that we endure in our bodies. So if they do not appreciate all that we go through in our bodies, then why should they be allowed to derive pleasure from our bodies? They didn't even deserve to have been born at all if they don't appreciate it!
Which brings me to my next recommendation: Do.
Not.
Date.
Or.
Have.
Sex.
With.
Men.
Who.
Believe.
That.
Women.
Should.
Be.
Drafted.
Most women do not understand the immense sexual power that we have. Think about it: women do not spend hundreds of dollars to sleep with men. Men do spend hundreds of dollars to sleep with women. Women do not spend dozens of dollars for a nude photo of someone sexy. Men do.
If women refuse to have sex with men who believe that women should be drafted, then most straight men would have no option but to “change their minds” about women getting drafted.
P.S. I also feel that women should do the same in regards to pro-life men. I do not recommend letting anyone derive pleasure from your body if they do not respect your bodily autonomy as well as all that you go through in order to live inside your body. Want sex? Then, respect.
What Girls & Guys Said
11 37I don't agree with anything that has been said in this Mytake.
Isn't that what all this equality stuff is about?
I mean obviously its bullshit to draft women - but this is what the actual equality debate comes down to.
If you're allowed to vote, you should be subject to decisions politicians make on your behalf.
Sure, if it's a female politician. But males have no right asking women to make any more sacrifices for them.
If you can register to vote hold a gun... If not go live somewhere else. Maybe when you actually take responsibility for who you vote for, you'll have better policy and less need for war.
Hold a gun? You mean, go to war? I'm disqualified from war due to mental illness.
That's fine we'll make you a special paratrooper. You'll go in all Rambo style solo.
It's not just guns, it's the military in general from which a mentally ill person such as myself is disqualified
Well we should take your right to vote with it... We don't want crazy people voting for the next Hitler...
Mentally ill people should have their right to vote taken away? (Btw if you're talking about Trump I'm not voting for him) Oh & if you're referring to me as "crazy" due to mental illness then Kindly Go Fuck Yourself
If they can't stand to defend the political decisions that are made in their name, yes
You first cunt.
You deserved to have been aborted xoxo xoxo <3
You're the mentally ill one.
So? What does that change anything? Would I have deserved to have been aborted if I was physically ill? No. People don't deserve to be aborted due to being ill. They deserve to be aborted due to being unappreciative assholes. Oh, and for being ableist.
Get back to your padded room...
I don't even know if those are a legit thing outside of movies
Sure you do. You spend a lot of time in them.
What about people with physical disabilities that exempt them from war? Should they also be unable to vote?
Only if they are as mentally screwed as you... Primarily I'm just looking to use you for a meat shield. We need to protect our gene pool for people like you.
Is your logic that women shouldn’t be allowed to vote if they’re not included in the draft, because voting involves selecting the person who makes decisions regarding the draft, which women shouldn’t be able to do if the draft wouldn’t affect them? You realize that voting also involves selecting the people who will make laws regarding childbirth and abortion? So in that case, men shouldn’t be allowed to vote either, because they could vote for someone who opposes abortion even in the case of rape, which literally makes life out to be a “childbirth draft” for us as soon as we hit puberty, where we might be raped & then be forced by the government to give birth against our will thereafter. So yeah, neither men nor women should have the right to vote by that logic.
Nope just you. For some strange reason you think you're a woman. I don't really understand where that comes from, but you insult all the real women out there by comparing yourself to them.
I'm a woman. I'll prove it. ;) Regardless... do you have an answer for my argument? If women shouldn’t be able to vote unless they have to sign up for the draft because voting involves selecting the people who may decide there’s a draft, which women wouldn’t personally have to deal with, then cis men shouldn’t be able to vote because voting involves selecting people who might ban abortion (perhaps even in the case of rape) which is something that cis men wouldn’t personally have to deal with. So, yeah, we should take away your right to vote.
Again you try to change the subject because you can't handle the original fight you picked. This is why you repeated get no respect. You don't own your actions.
That makes you a child... not a woman.
Can you respond to the argument please.
The original argument was finished a long time ago. You trying to create a new one on an old post that's about a month old just digs you deeper into that hole you created for yourself. If you have a new question, then post a new question to the public. Maybe I will answer, maybe I won't. You don't get to dictate that though.
It's funny how it's only about the actual act of childbirth and the act of abortion, with abortion being a whole industry unto itself. Every male taxpayer in the US supports this industry through the taxes, , CIulesss? They but Coul well yet for men actively curbs his rights as a parent and father, and may be very against abortion altogether. and everything else to do with it (and actually use none of
My post fell down an elevator shaft or something in mid-post, I guess.
No man who has had military service, or even understands the physiological and psychological differences between the sexes, wants women anywhere near the military. They cannot do the job and are a liability to everyone around them. Women in combat will destroy the effectiveness of the military and get the real soldiers killed.
The global elite have been murdering our sons for centuries, in their engineered wars for profit and conquest.
Now that white women of reproductive age are just 2 per cent of the world population, they want to draft our daughters and murder them too.
In response to the post by Mistixs, I find it darkly amusing that empowered modern women demand equal everything, except obligations and responsibilities. They want to cherry pick those. - lol
She is a splendid example of part of the reason why I walked away from women and have not touched a woman for almost 15 years.
Actually male military officers are the ones who suggested that women should be drafted. And 60% of men say that women should be drafted. And if men want equal responsibilities then how about having your genitals ripped open and undergoing pregnancy and childbirth pain simulators in order to gain custody over your biological child?
The only male military officer who would want a female draft would be the pussified libtard political appointments who have NO combat experience. I am a former Australian Army officer. I can tell you with absolute certainty that women cannot perform in combat. The female Kurdish militia that has been successful against ISL has worked (to this point) because: 1. They are not carrying packs; 2. Are not engaged in hand-to-hand fighting; 3. Their opposition are Arabs. Picture this: take a 60kg average female; strap the typical infantry load of 40kg to her; then have her cover 10km at quick time; assault up hill, while maintaining formation, bayonet fight the enemy (typically 90kg to 100kg men) on the objective (including bayonetting all enemy wounded on the ground); then form at a reorg point just off the objective. Your attitude to men is strongly misandric. Okay, you hate men. That is your choice. Your proposition about what men should undergo for custody is absurd.
Why does their opposition being Arabs make a difference? But yeah I agree that women just generally aren't built for warfare. And I dont actually believe that men should have to do that. I'm just saying that giving women the disadvantages of being a man is only equality if we give men the disadvantages of a woman. We never asked men to take on the disadvantages of being women.
Contrary to the delusion that grips the social justice warriors and sundry other leftards, there are significant intellectual and physical differences between the races.
There are differences in skeletal structure, teeth, muscle structure, brain size, intelligence and dominant personality traits.
See: Herrnstein, RJ & Murray C 1994, The Bell Curve, Simon & Schuster, New York, NY.
The average IQ in the Arab world has been shown to be not much more than borderline retarded. In any statistical model, half of the subjects are less than average. Therefore, it would be reasonable to state that roughly half the Arab world would be in the retarded range.
See this report on a study:
www.alsumaria.tv/.../en#
The character traits of Arabs include (but are not limited to) a tendency to respond emotionally and irrationally when pressure is applied.
See this video of Iraqi police recruits trying to do star jumps.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6p1nn1CuZs
So ISIL has a very low IQ?
The published science shows that, on average, that is highly likely. All that one has to do is look at videos of the clowns trying to use military weapons. They are big heroes when they are against people who cannot shoot back, but panic and turn to crap when someone shoots back. At heart, they are miserable cowards. A real army would clean up ISIL fairly quickly, if it was allowed to do the job. From the point of view of a former soldier, it would be almost a turkey shoot. . . except that the turkeys could return fire. The way to deal with ISIL is to go in there in force, no rules of engagement, no prisoners, all bullets dipped in pigs' blood and all explosive ordinance to contain a small quantity of freeze-dried pigs' blood.
This video has to be seen to be believed. This is the intellectual standard of the ISIL troops.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wTq7_lkAIV0
Does low IQ correlate with poor military ability?
Very much so. The less intelligent that a person is the less that they are able to think tactically and respond coolly and rationally to situations.
No offense, but considering your age, when was the last war you fought in? I'm asking because I'm guessing many military officer think women would be beneficial in their army is because war has changed a lot. In the wars we are currently involved in, in the middle east, women who can interact with other women, which men aren't allowed to in that culture, are invaluable. Especially if they're there on a humanitatrian mission That's what my friend told me anyway
@nalaa Exactly. The British Army for example had a special female unit in Afghanistan which purpose was to interact with the population and build trust. It also has psychological reasons, because women make a more peaceful and benevolent impression.
@nalaa The fundamentals of warfare do not change. Students of history (especially military history) understand this. The principles written by the likes of Sun Tzu 2,000 years ago; the tactics employed by the Romans and Greeks, still have applications today. Obviously, changes have to be made for differences in weaponry, but the principles of military tactics remain the same. In any conflict, it will eventually get down to two grunts who are tired, hungry, dirty and pumped with adrenalin, going toe to toe with fixed bayonets. The only place that women can have in a military is in a support role, a long way from the front line. As for getting warm and fuzzy with Muslim women, I could care less. The rules should be simple: If you oppose us, you will die. If you assist those who oppose us, you will die. If you keep your head down and not oppose us, you will be left alone. The way to fight Jihadis was demonstrated by US general Jack Pershing, in The Phillipines.
@Mártainn Wars are not won by being 'peaceful and benevolent'. They are won by exterminating the enemy. Getting warm and fuzzy with people who will come at you and cut your throat the first chance that they get is an idiotic course of action. Wars are won by sound military tactics and overwhelming force. When all the enemy are dead, an area can be declared cleared.
I wasn't talking about wars, I was talking about peacekeeping missions and the like. Operations where it's beneficial to gain the population's trust. I'm highly critical of women in combat roles myself.
I'm against draft for men or for women.
I was drafted. It cost me two years of my life and an awful lot of money.
I'm sorry you were drafted. :/ I think that's terrible. What was it like?
Like two years of boot camp or jail when you're 100% innocent.
I don't know what boot camp and jail are like. Can you explain a bit more? If you're comfortable.
Being imprisoned in a 'military facility' with shouting morons in uniform ruling your life 24/24, 265/365 , getting just food, some clothes and a bit of an allowance , like a kid. You have weekend permissions (except when they give you some 'weekend duty' like guarding the premises.) Lots of training, in uniform, with heavy boots, steel helmet and toting a rifle all day long. Sleeping in 8 person rooms, less privacy than HS students. In the evening also had to study to get an officer's commission. While people outside are FREE to go and live where they want, FREE to make career get promotions and to earn real money. And that's during peace times. If there's a war, other poor idiots from the 'enemy' side try to KILL you. In the same manner as you learn to kill hem. Just try to imagine it.
Being in a mental hospital was the closest in my life that I'd ever been to hell on earth. Do you have any experience with that? If so, how does it compare? (So that I can have a frame of reference.)
money? What did you have to pay?
@nalaa No, I hadn't to pay, I received a few $/day but I could have worked two years instead, so it did cost me 2 years income.
@ mistixs Being drafted in the army is probably nearly like being locked up in a mental ward, yes. But in a mental ward the doctors and medical personnel will be nice.
NOOOOO they weren't!!! That was the worst part! They were absolutely terrible!!
Do you think sergeants are nice towards recruits?
No, not at all. I can barely imagine how bad sergeants are if they're worse than the people at my mental hospital.
I am not understanding your opinion at all. You were drafted... for two years. And you never "graduated" beyond recruit? And what the heck are you meaning about studying to be an officer. Draftees went to boot and then to a job. Movement to officer would not come within that two years. Seeing that I was very likely to be drafted I volunteered. Got through boot and got radio training and went to a two year assignment on Okinawa. A lot of freedom. Beautiful snorkeling water! Great prices on electronics. Lots more later, but that was just the first two years.
@Red_Arrow so you actually liked it?
I ended up re-enlisting and staying in for 20 (plus) years. Provided me and my family with some financial security, and got to visit places others only get to read about: Australia, Thailand, Pakistan, Scotland, Sweden, Norway, Spain, France, Italy, Egypt, Okinawa, and Tunisia, and prob ably have left out some places. I have been in the Blue Grotto, the top of the Leaning Tower of Pisa, climbed the pyramids in Egypt, and saw the King Tut exhibit in their national museum. Also been to Edinburgh Castle. Some bad moments, but overall a real treat.
@Red_Arrow huh. Did you ever go to combat?
I was on a ship involved with the Iraq/Iran war. We provided air cover for ships going into the gulf, and we were within striking distance from Iran. Another time we were on a small ship going into waters that we considered international to keep them free, even though Russia considered it theirs, so we were not in combat there, but were at risk for it at any time. the rest of the time I was providing support for units in combat but not in combat myself.
@Red_Arrow I got my HD with the rank of lieutenant. Luckily we were not involved in any of the American government's criminal wars.
Not familiar with the term HD, not how your system advances people to commissioned officer with no real preparation. As for our criminal wars, are you referring to when we were helping you guys?
@Red_Arrow HD = Honorable Discharge.
@Red_Arrow
The Afghan , Iraq and Libyan wars were genocides committed with just geostrategic and geo-economic aims. Oil control.
As to 'helping us' , The US had financed Hitler's rise and continued to supply oil for German tanks and planes. (Germany has no oil)
US 'help was paid by the U. K. in gold and overseas assets and by Belgium in uranium. It's not known whether the inhabitants of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were killed by Belgian or Canadian uranium. The middleman was Edgar Sengier. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edgar_Sengier
So what I take from this-
I want equality, but only if it benefits me
and
Women control sex, so they can do whatever the fuck they want and men are should play along with their hormone crazed irrational tangents.
Thinking you're not happy until you have a guy crawling at your feet with his balls in your purse.
Though I do agree, women should not be drafted and dont really belong in combat. But your reasoning is fucked.
what's more impressive? the fact that you believe this horse shit or the fact that you wrote an essay to explain said horse shit? :D. either way, you're fucking retarded!!!
lol go fuck yourself.
LITERALLY. Since she thinks she doesn't need any other man to fuck her.
The troll is strong in this one.
Did you just compare the draft to periods? This is some sexist bullshit, of course the draft should be for women too, that's only fair. Opinions like yours is what inequality is made of.
Women don't have sex with nice respectful guys anyway lol So damned if we do damned if we don't. But yes women have the sexual power, hence why many men pay for it.
Sorry it's too authoritain for me and too artificial, makes no sense to me. It's a bit.. Plastic
Look, you want equality then if men get drafted women get drafted.
I'm a feminist very much do to my mothers influence and do you know what SHE IS EX-MILITARY.
She says, "We want equality in all things, then the draft is one of them."
Equality doesn't mean you get to pick the good societal parts and leave the bad ones.
Equality means you get everything.
"- is here because a woman risked her life going through the sacrifice of giving birth to him. It’s only fair that men protect women in return after all the sacrifices women make so that men can even be alive. " First off, in the western world, there is essentially no real risk to having children due to modern medicine, sure it hurts like a motherfucker but there isn't a real risk of death. Whereas
"Hell was red furry spiders as big as your fist, giant lizards as long as your leg, leeches falling from trees to suck blood, armies of white ants with bites of fire…Hell was an enemy hidden in the dark deep shadows, an enemy so fanatic that it used its own dead as booby traps.” Guadalcanal soldier Ralph Martin
FYI,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mT3q8tba_lw
Tell me that childbirth is anywhere near as bad as that.
But no, Childbirth is basically risk free in the western world wheras war is still like, "“People were yelling, screaming, dying, running on the beach, equipment was flying everywhere, men were bleeding to death, crawling, lying everywhere, firing coming from all directions…we dropped down behind anything that was the size of a golf ball” Omaha soldier Felix Branham
Not being a hypocrite if we don't want men's disadvantages. Because we never said that men had to take up *our* disadvantages.
See, here is the thing, there are biological disadvantages and there are The downsides of living in a society. A biological disadvantage would be something like Childbirth for women or the fact that if men live long enough (like 80's or 90s) the chance of developing prostate cancer soon comes to 100% Now a Societal Disadvantage is different. Whereas a biological disadvantage comes from biology. Now a downside from living in a society is different. So, things like the right to vote or own property are just as much as a part of society as jury duty, or in this case the draft. So yes, as you are actually being a hypocrite for saying you want to be treated as an equal in society but not wanting to actually be equal. Most feminists, like myself, would point out that you are being a hypocrite for only saying you get to have the benefits of being a part of society but not the downsides.
My mother would tell you, "Get over yourself and buck the fuck up."
Furthermore, it does actually vary from society. Currently, only nine countries have laws allowing for the conscription of women into their armed forces: China, Eritrea, Israel, Libya, Malaysia, North Korea, Norway, Bolivia and Taiwan. I know for a fact that In Israel both men and women both have to do compulsary military service. So yes, its just being a part of society and it does make you a hypocrite
The path to gender equality regarding the draft is to get rid of it for men, not extend it to women. Just like the path to gender equality regarding voting was to give women the right to vote, not take it away from men.
You see the problem with getting rid of the draft is that there are two occasions where it proved necessary and one where it would have Helped. We wouldn't have been able to kick the shit out of Imperial Japan without the Draft. Without the Draft, The Slave owning confederate bastards would have won the Civil war. And in the War of 1812 with a draft we would have been able to prevent the brits from burning down the white house. So keep selective service so if it is (god forbid) ever needed we have and force women to register, especially since we have women combat troops and a woman passed ranger school proves they can fight just as well.
There are also situations in which forcing women to have abortions would be "helpful"... that doesn't mean we should do it. You shouldn't be able to force anyone to do anything against their will.
Look, My grandfathers cousin helped liberate one of the concetration camps. So, yes. If something like that happened again, you should.
So, if we have to force people to fight the next Nazi germany or imperial japan, then so be it, to let such an evil live would be a stain on our society as a whole
Whatever. And I dont really want equality. It's not just due to the draft, I've never really wanted equality. (No that doesn't make me lose my feminist card, there are some versions of feminism that explicitly state that men and women are not equal and should not be treated as such, see "difference feminism")
Oh, I know about difference feminism, I just think that its fucking stupid, See, separate but equal and the civil rights movement, So yeah
So yeah, you want the right to vote and own property, then you gotta pay the fucking piper when he comes. So yeah you are being a hypocrite
But no, difference feminism is not feminism.
Yes it is feminism. Even if you look at the "equality" definition of feminism, it says "advocating for WOMEN'S *RIGHTS* on the basis of equality with men". Anyway, men should have no right over women's bodies. Being the ones who give birth to civilization, women are the ones who rightfully should have control over civilization, be the ones distributing rights, etc. Men are lucky that we allow them to do that. When men try to control women's bodies (such as by trying to force women into a draft), they are stepping out of their place.
"Anyway, men should have no right over women's bodies. Being the ones who give birth to civilization, women are the ones who rightfully should have control over civilization, be the ones distributing rights, etc. Men are lucky that we allow them to do that. When men try to control women's bodies (such as by trying to force women into a draft), they are stepping out of their place." Well, Ah, so you believe that one group of people is superior to the other on the basis of biology, oh, whats the term for that, ah, a bigot. You are a bigot
"women are the ones who rightfully should have control over civilization, be the ones distributing rights, etc. Men are lucky that we allow them to do that. " History has shown that Queens can be just as bloody and vile as kings. People like the Queen of England Bloody Mary or the vile trash who took the throne from her, Queen Elizabeth were just as vile and disgusting pieces of trash as people like Ivan the terrible. Second no one ALLOWS MEN to do anything in this society. The point of democracy is that EVERYONE gets a vote. Thats the whole fucking point, man or woman, black or white, or yellow, or red. gets ONE vote. No one is more qualified to choose who rules the country than the next. Thats the only fair way.
Yeah, basically. My point is that men have no right to control over women's bodies.
"When men try to control women's bodies (such as by trying to force women into a draft), they are stepping out of their place." Oh, stepping out of my place am I. Again, being part of society means that you get the good and the bad. So its not trying to control womens bodies. It is simply showing that every single member of society contributes the same, you want something else, go form your own country on some desert island. There are a few unclaim subantarctic islands. But MY PLACE. What might that be oh mighty ruler. Oh wise one. My place is whatever I say it is, your place is whatever you say it is. Thats what a free society is about. It seems like that is a hard thing to grasp for you
What control, That if an entire society is under attack that every single member of that society should pitch in to save their home. That is not an unreasonable request
And as for your bitching and moaning about all this, Considering that No one has repealed the eugenics for those with Mental Illness laws in my and some asshole judge tried ot use them in 2012. I'M THE ONE WHO COULD BE FORCIBLY STERILIZED AGAINST MY WILL NOT YOU IF SOCIETY SUDDENLY WENT BACKWARDS
Your place is wherever you say it is... unless that place involves forcing women to do things. Anyway, I'm also mentally ill. If you scroll down, there was an asshole down there making fun of me for it ("get back to your padded room" - and as someone who has been in a mental hospital, I don't even know if those exist outside of movies) Those laws should be repealed, and that's of concern to me, too... However, that doesn't really have anything to do with this conversation.
i'm fine with that. let's also revoke women's right to vote, and no fault divorce and alimony law while we're at it.
you dont get authority without responsibility, bitch. equality isn't free.
I don't want equality. If anything, I want female supremacy. *Being the ones who give birth to civilization, women are the ones who rightfully should have control over civilization, be the ones distributing rights, etc. Men are already stepping out of their place, since they're the ones in power. Taking away women's right to vote would be stepping even MORE out of their place.*
your problem is, women can only ever be as 'supreme ' as we make you. women are one bad day from being bitch slapped and told to get back in the kitchen.
It just wouldn't happen, due to the violent nature of men when pushing for power and stature. It would just get violent. You'd essentially be reverting the modern man for either a feminized version who can not protect you, or himself and on the opposing side. Angry sexless or bi curious men. Basically Modernized Spartans fighting Modernized Amazonian with "pet" men, who could easily be compelled to join the other side. You want the option of leadership, an you should happen, but are you willing to kill without prejudice for a common goal. Not to mention it's easier to orchestrate an army of men, we fall in line for survival purposes. However an army of women could have internal consequences. Most men have a strong inclination for duty, most women need a certain consistent set of circumstances to fall in line, especially if it meant their life, given their affinity to preserve life. Men are natural destroyers.
What a load of shit.
Um, I would totally be with a man who believed in equality. If there has to be a draft, both men and women should be included in it.
i wish i could like more than once
SORRY?
Men are the ones who are expected to give up their lives in situations like the Titanic
Men are expected to be the ones to sacrifice themselves
Men have to DEAL with the stuff women deal with
The Draft cannot be removed. And if women want the same equality, they're gonna have to accept some of the shitty parts along with the perks
"if women want the same equality, they're gonna have to accept some of the shitty parts along with the perks" I'll only agree with giving women the disadvantages of being a man, if we also give men the disadvantages of being a woman.* otherwise it is the opposite of equality. * knives exist to tear open mens genitals & pregnancy and childbirth simulators, all so that men can endure birth pain in order to obtain custody of biological kids... and in Aboriginal Australia men cut the insides of their thighs to bleed monthly. like women do, men can be forced to do that here. If women get men's disavantage then men should get womens. by the way "women and children firstc" actually rarely happens, titanic was and anamoly. Look it up
Except that is bullshit. Just because a woman happens to suffer from periods and pregnancy doesn't mean she deserves more rights than men do. That's like saying men should pay a tax to all women everywhere every month just because they experience menstrual cramps. That is exactly like a child making a parent their slave because their arm or leg is broken. That rarely happens? That's PROTOCOL!!! In EVERY operation with regards to a hostage situation, burning building, etc., the priority is to ALWAYS release the women and children first. Watch any documentary, movie, story etc. about it. Women also always get more sympathy than men in courtrooms when it comes to crimes
Well, yes, women's extra responsibilities DO mean that women should get more rights, at least by the logic that "if women wanted equal rights (voting) they should have equal responsibility (signing up for the draft)."
So, I contend... if men want equal parental rights, they shold have equal responsibility (pain).
And I actually was thinking today that I think that men should pay 50% of women's menstrual products because women menstruate just as much so that MEN can have kids, so as that they themselves can have kids.
And no that's a myth www.history.com/.../women-and-children-first-on-sinking-ships-its-every-man-for-himself
In almost any situation, not only boating accidents, women and children are put first. In a fire, for example. The role of men is always designated to put other lives before yours and help people escape the building.
SHIT I LOST THE SECOND HALF OF MY REPLY Men do not have equal parental rights. In divorce, women almost always get the child, with the exception of special cases. What do you mean by that? Men just going to the store?
I gave a source that it's a myth. And well then I guess it's justified that men don't have equal parental rights then, and men should not complain about it. Because if they want equal rights they should take equal responsibility (pain) And I don't know I just think men should pay 50% somehow
Really? In fires, in some buildings it's WRITTEN CODE that the men assist the women and children in escaping! How is that justified in any way? The woman made the choice to have a child, therefore she accepted the rights she was given, which SHOULD be equal to a man's. A man supports his partner through the pregnancy (granted if he's a GOOD partner.) Well I don't know how we would do that but I have no reason to fight that
RESPECT THE POWER OF THE PUSSY
shut yo bitch ass pussy ass up
Damn that's cold sir.
:/ :/ :/ :/ :P
s31.postimg.org/.../...297793833_1460849028167.jpg
Mad or nah?
I'm amazed by the number of women on here who think they can justify not doing anything because they have periods and have babies. The privelage that these women have is insane.