Sexual Relationships 
Sexual Health 
If you remove the condom during sexual intercourse without the permission of the partner, it will be considered as a crime. The Supreme Court of Canada has given a similar decision in a case of sexual harassment. According to media reports, the case dates back to 2017, in which a couple had physical relations during a meeting after making online friendship.
The second time during intercourse, the man removed the condom without telling the woman. When the woman came to know about it, she took medicines to prevent HIV.
The woman then accused the defendant, Ross McKenzie Kirkpatrick, of sexual harassment. However, the trial court judge dismissed the charge, accepting Kirkpatrick's argument that the complainant woman had consented to intercourse without a condom.
The trial court's decision in this case was overturned by the British Columbia Court of Appeals. It ordered a fresh test. Kirkpatrick appealed against this decision in the Supreme Court of the country in November last year. During the hearing of the case, the court observed that the use of condom cannot be irrelevant, secondary or incidental, especially when the complainant has expressly given his consent for its use.
The defendant's counsel said that this new interpretation of the Criminal Code would significantly change the rules for sexual consent, making it more like a contract that could be signed in advance. In the report regarding this matter, it has been said that the courts of Britain and Switzerland have convicted people of the crime of removing condoms during sexual intercourse.
DO YOU AGREE 👍?
What Girls & Guys Said
12 34No problem here. Punching wholes into the condom should also count as rape while we are at it.
How tha hell can such thing be proved, on who is lying and who is telling the truth. Both men and women can go as far as imaginable with tjeir lies to cover their own ass at all costs.
Innocent women have been raped and not believed. Innocent men have been acused of rape, locked up and not given any chances to degend their dignity, even after proven innocent. Both genders are capable of all kinds of horrors and there is no such thing as true justice for all.
I agree with this in theory and am concerned at the same time someone could say you pulled off your condom. How would anyone know who to trust? Do we need to have condom cams on?
The sad thing is if your asked to use a condom clearly as a man you should keep it on. I can't believe people think it's ok to just take it off during and try to get away with it.
This ruling is going to be hell to enforce.
it breaking or slipping off is rare. if you blatantly take it off then you should be in trouble there.
What if it just come off
oops go to jail
Just pop a hole in the tip with a needle before you ever unwrap it if you’re so anxious to nut inside her, but you better be std free and ready to pay child support.
So no more using this excuse in Canada.
UK here and yes you're right, man was convicted of sexual assault,,,
Agreed.
This is already a crime in Sweden called "Sex by Surprise".
I have mix feeling, but will go for disagree
Is it a crime if the WOMAN removes it so she can get pregnant? Or just if the man does? I am betting no woman will ever be prosecuted for this.
NBA players, at rookie orientation, are warned of women removing condoms from the trash to impregnate themselves. That should be a crime.
@msc545 Don’t you think the guy would feel it if a woman pulled his condom off?
@Flower7 Yes I would feel it. So is it not a crime because of that? Is that your contention?
The crime wouldn’t be able to happen because why would he continue having sex with her knowing the condom was gone?
@Flower7 The act by her of pulling off the condom is what constitutes the crime, not him continuing to fuck her. SHE is the criminal, not him.
@msc545 At that point, that would mean he has consented to having unprotected sex.
@Flower7 it would NOT mean that at all.
Thats a very one sided rule.
It should be a crime, and depending on where you live, it is. It's rape.
Yes, it is against the rules
fuck yea
What it will turn into is another 'his word-her word' thing that can't be proven because unless you're recording it or have an audience to make sure he as it on the whole time, how can it be proven?
Another law that will no doubt quickly be weaponized by women of low character.
This will usher in a new era of unprotected sex. Idiot judges. Now no one is gonna want to a use a condom because it basically is saying that you’re setting yourself up for legal ramifications that unprotected sex “guarantees” you won’t.
I mean, wtf judges? We need impartial judicial decisions, not this emotion laden witlessness that hasn’t been thought out for more than a single minute. Seriously, RESIGN NOW YOU DUMB JUDGES.
Thank goodness I don’t live in that backwards country Canada. How the hell are you going to enforce that? Women could literally falsely accuse men and there would be no way to prove or disprove it. It’s a he said she said merry go round all in favor of women. Either turn gay, be celibate, or make the women use contraception instead. That’s completely madness. Not because I disagree with it being wrong, but because it should be up to the people screwing to handle it. Why the hell would you screw people you don’t know have stds? Why can’t you just stop being being promiscuous and sleeping around with strangers. This is like the YouTube videos I see of police knocking on doors asking people if they posted a tweet online or commented something. Canada is almost communist like Australia at this point.