Should it be illegal to lie about being on birth control or removing the condom during sex without their knowledge?

Should it be illegal to lie about being on birth control or removing the condom during sex without their knowledge?
Yes
Vote A
No
Vote B
Other (left my comments below)
Vote C
see poll
Vote D
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Girl Guy
2 1

AI Bot Choice

Superb Opinion
  • Hell yeah it should be illegal. Because first of all it is totally respectles and second if she decided in the end to have that child, see you young people still don't know what a pain that is to bring a new life into this world. I was in the room when the mother of my son gave birth to our son. If you remove that shit and she doesn't want to kill that baby then be fucking men and take care of that women and that child. Oh yeah yeah fucking is easy right? Yeah it feels good right? Realy it makes me sick when I even think about it. You know what stop fucking if you ain't ready to take and handle the consequences because the consequences is a new life. I wish there would be no such things then abortion or the pill. Maybe then people would start thinking more.

    Damn it!

    Sorry but topics like that always makes me so fucking angry.

Most Helpful Guy

    • which is why you should never sleep with someone you can not trust.
    • if a condom gets remove during sex without consent. it can be viewed as rape in many places.
    • if a girl lies about using birth control it do not count as rape in many places.
    • the modern court system is rigged against men in pretty much every possible way. when it comes to sex, relationships or marriage.
    • which is why smart men don't marry or long term date sluts.
    • Yes makes sense to me!

    • typo *if a girl lies about using birth control it does not count as rape in many places.*

Most Helpful Girls

  • Yes, and it must be applied equally to both sexes.

    I know a few good men whose girlfriends forced them into fatherhood by pretending to be on the pill when they weren't. I even have heard horror stories of nightmare MILs poking holes in condoms to help their psychotic daughters get pregnant (like mother like daughter there, apparently).

    I've also known women who were made miserable and saddled with bad health and children they never truly wanted because their idiot boyfriends thought a raw fuck would be better than a childfree life or a future within their own control.

    It should be considered a lesser form of sexual harassment.

  • Yes to the corn control, but a condom? How would you not know someone's removing a condom, I don't have a penis but I'm pretty sure you'd be able to tell the difference

    • *birth control not corn 😅🤣🤣

    • Oh duh you meant if the guy removed, but still then the female should stop the sex again you can tell the difference

    • If you are in the moment and he rips it off... no you won't be able to tell the difference in most cases if it's from behind especially. At this point it's pressure and thrusts that are being signaled by the brain.

    • Show All

Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions

What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!

What Girls & Guys Said

27 52
  • It is illegal at least here in Cali it is !!

    • Correction: it's illegal to remove a condom, not illegal to lie about birth control. I see you.

    • Correction: it’s illegal for both even though yes the birth control one would be harder to do anything about but it’s pretty hard with the condom one too, also “I see you”.

    • Lies. Your soul is visible to me. Hermesmann v. Seyer (State of Kansas ex rel. Hermesmann v. Seyer, 847 P.2d 1273 (Kan. 1993)),[1] was a precedent-setting Kansas, United States, case in which Colleen Hermesmann successfully argued that a *woman is entitled to sue the father of her child for child support even if conception occurred as a result of a criminal act committed by the woman.* [2][3] The case was brought in her name by the then Kansas Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services.

    • Show All
  • Yes, all the way. This is how STDs are spread and that is life-threatening or detrimental to one’s fertility if they want kids one day. If someone’s life is being threatened and their wishes to not have a child are being disrespected, then it needs to be illegal. I also don’t support abortion so if the conception of a child can be avoided, I’m in full support of that. I don’t want to see any lives being taken away for the sake of convenience.

  • Might be nice but somewhat difficult to prove!

  • I think it should be. I mean, we have STDs and STIs going around and if the person knows they have it and don't tell their partner then it's a criminal offense. So maybe it should be similar with lying about birth control and condoms since you are putting another person's life at risk.

  • How do you prove a case against a violator if you prosecute them and, if convicted, what is the sentence?

  • That would be Impossible to enforce. To me every person should just...
    1. Be careful in who they choose to have sex with.
    2. be responsible for your own actions.
    “if your a man that doesn’t want a child, take the proper precautions”
    “if your a woman that doesn’t want a child, take the proper precautions”.
    these things are totally within our control, regardless of if your a male or female.

  • You should be with someone you really trust.

  • Yes. And it should be legal to abort liars just like it’s legal to abort the unborn

  • That's entrapment

  • Yes, both should be illegal.

    Can't speak for other countries, but removing a condom during sex and having non-consensual bareback sex IS illegal in the UK. I believe there's been one prosecution for a man lying about having had a vasectomy.

    There's no protection for the man though, it's not illegal to lie about being on the pill.

  • YES!! Some say they are on the Pill, but I ALWAYS use a condom!! One time, one lied, so EVERY TIME, I use a condom, and the ones with the spermicide!!

  • The condom one is a form of rape. The birth control one isn’t illegal as far as I know.

    • The illegal one has a female as the victim. The legal one has the male as the victim. Notice the pattern?

    • @b5fan EXACTLY!

    • Why did someone thumbs down my true post? Don’t get mad at me, I didn’t make the laws 🤣

    • Show All
  • Perhaps. But there would be no real way to prove it.

  • No I don't think so. If you really had full trust with the person your having sex with then this shouldn't ever be a issue.

    • Again another person blaming it on you should trust the person. No matter how much you trust someone they could turn out to be abusive, manipulative, liar. And your blaming the victim like well they should of trusted someone better. Smh

  • I cannot think of any legit way to enforce that law.
    It'd be "he said, she said".

  • Both are consenting adults and they should be aware of the risks. Knowing that pregnancy can occur even if all measures were taken. You just have to be prepared for that to be a result

  • No, this isn't something the government should be involved with. It's each individual's responsibility to properly vet their own sexual partners. If you don't even trust someone enough not to lie about birth control... maybe you shouldn't be having sex with them? Just a thought ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

  • Yes, you f you like living in an authoritarian dictatorship. Keep the government out of the bedroom.

    • You cannot legislate morality

  • A guy who doesn't know you well enough to know if you are on contraception should be wearing a condom. If he doesn't and the woman gets pregnant, he's still liable for support.

    Stealthily removing a condom amounts to rape.

    • I think you're distorting the definition of rape in this case. Rape occurs when you penetrate (or do sexual acts to) someone without their consent. Whether you put a condom on whatever you use for penetration doesn't really influence whether one gave or didn't gave their consent. The fact that then there is an unwanted pregnancy should be analysed as a different matter, as fundamentally it is not an act of phisical violence but deception

    • @Vencam I'm not. Consent was given for sex with a condom. No condom, no consent. No consent? It's rape

    • I'll give an example to clarify my point Imagine you're having a play with your girlfriend where you have sex while she's blindfolded. She gives you her consent to you penetrating her with your dick. But during the heat of the moment, you use a vibrator you bought to surprise her and penetrate her with that. By your logic, since you didn't penetrate her with your dick as you agreed, she could sue you for rape, despite that not being an act of "aggression" (which rape falls under: its VIOLENCE towards someone) When giving consent, you accept to either be penetrated or penetrate and doing either of those WITHOUT consent is in fact rape. But deciding on what birth controls to use is NOT part of that agreement, it's a different one and does not involve any act of violence between one another (which, again, is necessary and needs to be sexual violence in order for it to be rape). To clarify, I'm not saying one has the right to infringe the birth control agreement he made with the partner (I'm slusing the generical "he"), but doing so is betraying someone's trust not a form of violence towards their person I hope I made the distinction clear

    • Show All
  • Most definitely

  • Show More (59)