Since it is legal to circumcise baby boys, should it be legal to clitorectomize baby girls?

I believe in gender equality
I believe in gender equality
Both should be legal
Vote A
Neither should be legal
Vote B
It should be legal to clitorectomize baby girls, but not to circumcise baby boys
Vote C
It should be legal to circumcise baby boys, but not to clitorectomize baby girls
Vote D
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Girl Guy
0 0

AI Bot Choice

Superb Opinion
  • first of all, i don't condone ANY genital mutilation and i do consider male circumcision genital mutilation IF it is done to a child. as an adult, you do what you want with your body. it's your body and if you're at the age of consent, you do what you think is right with your body. no judgement from my side.

    Having said that, cutting off a womans clitoris is like cutting of a mans glans, NOT like cutting of a mans foreskin. the equivalent thing would be removing parts of the minoras. so that's not a fair comparison that you're making.

    • The foreskin is sensitive... the glans is not

    • @BetterOffAlone dude... i am uncut. and i don't need my foreskin at all to orgasm. this is utter bullshit. yeah it's sensitive like any piece of skin and it helps with arousal, as it rubs over the glans but the glans is the thing that makes the orgasm, not the foreskin. same with the clitporis. the clitoris makes the orgasm.

    • 1. I'm circumcised and I hate it. My glans is not at all sensitive, and I barely feel anything when I have sex... I'd rather have a foreskin and no glans than a glans and no foreskin 2. Females don't need an orgasm to become pregnant.

    • Show All

Most Helpful Guy

  • WTF over. A 'clitorectomy' or whatever the fuck you're calling it, would be the equivalent of completely removing his penis. A little foreskin is fine. It's not your problem, just move on.

    • Technically, women don't need any clitoris to get impregnated by a strong man

    • @BetterOffAlone - Which changes nothing.

Most Helpful Girls

  • It’s not the same thing boys are for estestics and cleanliness women female genitalia mutalation is to try and control women’s sexuality it’s barbaric and it prevents women from having organisms. Men who are circumcised are still able to have organisms. The female version is only done in barbarism

    • Organisms? Learn to speak English and then try again... And male circumcision was invented to reduce sensitivity..."cleanliness and aesthetics" are an ad hoc justification

    • @BetterOffAlone this site has terrible spell check features I speak better English than you I am sure, I am from CT, when I wrote papers I just used editing. I do not care if you do not want boys Circumcised, I did not do it to hurt my son I love him, I did it bc it's the norm and American Woman, like myself think it looks weird, I am sure it is fine in some European countries or something but here in the US it looks weird to us. What bothers me is your fuc#ed up view of women not being able to have pleasure and it's a red flag you are not from a culture that respects women.

    • You are a terrible mom, no better than the dad who made a sexy-time with his 12-year-old daughter. Even if you didn't mean to hurt your son, you did. You wounded him grievously, and in a sane world, CPS would take him away and lock you up forever, and throw away the key. Also, why the FUCK do you care how your son's genitals look? Are you planning on having sex with him? Do you admire the aesthetics of his genitals? You fucking creep. You don't deserve a clitoris after what you did, you baby butcher, you.

  • I think violating a child who has no say is cruel, unless it is a medical matter and needs to happen.

Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions

What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!

What Girls & Guys Said

3 5
  • Those are two totally different things. Removing a girl's clit is equivalent to cutting the head off a boy's penis.

    • Exactly this question is sick and so are some of the votes

    • The head of the penis has virtually no sensitivity

  • do it in the name of equal rights as a cover (women’s suffrage did the same thing)

    but really it’s to stop women from being whores

    • Exactly

  • Nobody should get part of their genitals cut up without their consent.

  • so you want to take away a pleasure point from a woman? compared to what something is done to boys for sanitary purposes? Are you stupid? or are you stupid?

    • Circumcision is to take pleasure from boys, there's nothing sanitary about it. Think, circumcision leaves an open wound on the genitals, which is then placed in a diaper. And females don't deserve sexual pleasure anyway

    • If women don't deserve sexual pleasure then neither do men.

    • @mistixs Well, since I was circumcised against my will as an infant, I will never have sexual pleasure, so I don't mind taking it away from everyone else.

    • Show All
  • "What is good for the gander, is good for the goose".

  • they are not the same

    • I know. Male circumcision is worse.

    • Male circumcision is just cutting a piece of skin, female circumcision is cutting an integral part of the female genitals, circumcised male can still orgasm and feel the pleasure even after getting circumcised, circumcised female can't orgasm or have pleasure, do they are totally different.

  • It should absolutely be illegal to cut off parts of baby genitals. It’s monstrous, morbid, and just plain gross and unnatural.

  • Let's have girls clitorectomized for a century to make things even and then ban all genital mutilation

    • cutting off a clitoris and cutting off a foreskin are not at all equivalent things. cutting off the labia would be equivalent.

    • @genericname85 Well, women should suffer genital mutilation for a hundred years to make up for a hundred years of male circumcision in america

    • So should black Americans enslave whites "to make it even"? Should straight people be forced into asylums and lobotomized like gay people were, "to make it even"? This is stupid.

    • Show All