Sexual Relationships 
Sexual Health 
In recent years there has been an inflation of strange men who have decided to become an enemy of their own gender. When I say an enemy of their own gender I'm talking about men that will jump to a woman's defense at every opportunity they get, even when the woman is the one in the wrong. These men are known as white knights, manginas, or male feminists.
All three are equally pathetic. They remind me of white people who praise people of a different skin colour but constantly criticise people of their own skin colour. They are the people who claim to hate racism, yet have no problem derogating white men. That's why most modern feminists will constantly attack white men, yet remain silent when thousands of women and girls get raped by Muslim gangs.
So what possesses certain men to become white knights, manginas, and male feminists? Are they hoping that it will get them laid? Do the hate their own gender? Or are they just brainwashed by feminist myths? I really don't know. But if you think about it, they are the ones who are sexist. They seem to think that women are so weak that they need a man to defend or pamper them. So what have these foolish men got to gain by defending women while pooping on their own gender?
I'm not saying it's wrong to defend a woman if a woman truly needs help. If a man tries to rape a woman then it's good that another man comes to her rescue. But the white knights, manginas, and male feminists are the kind of maniacs that would see a woman repeatedly punch a man in the face, and if the man so much as pushed the woman away in self defense, the white knights would come running to the woman's rescue and get angry at the man for defending himself.
In my opinion, being a real man doesn't mean pampering and sucking up to women while pooping on your own gender. A real man has the balls to stand up for what is right, in spite of public opposition. When I was at school, most of the teenage boys had this white knight mentality. They would jump to a girl's defense even if the girl was in the wrong.
Now I do believe it is natural for a man to want to protect a woman. I believe this is part of nature. But I don't think men should protect and defend women at the expense of their own gender. Like the fools on the Titanic. I would give my life for the children, but not for women. There have been a lot of dead heroes throughout history who thought it was a good idea to die for other women. I suspect many of these dead heroes were white knights and manginas. Dying to protect your wife or daughter is one thing, but dying to protect women in general is just plain stupid.
Thanks for reading.
What Girls & Guys Said
5 20I think the primary issue is that we have to look at the age group of these guys; most of the people that affiliate themselves with gender specific nonsense come out of the late 80s' and 90s', when there was this huge movement to be politically correct.
These guys grew up with sexually liberated, independent women. These aren't relics of the 1950s' come back to reclaim their throne. They grow up hearing about oppression, racism, sexism, and so on. Now, fill modern feminism with a few hatemongers who tend to be very abusive and unsympathetic towards men and expose these dudes to them... a guy growing up in these times will go "Hey, this feels a lot like that oppression thing" and then they start thinking and behaving like an oppressed group. They confide in each other, form echo chambers, so on and so forth.
It's also because males in this day and age don't have the agency of their forefathers; the "nuclear family" is seen as an illusion, we have technology to fill in the gaping hole where a social life would usually be found. Kind of warps people. Not just men, but people in general.
I agree that there's some points to be found as you would find in any gender/race/culture/sexual preference based movement, but there's hardly any dialogue between the movements. I think if everyone just sat down for a while and stopped trying to out-victim one another, we would be on to something awesome. But alas, every social movement seems to just consist of a bunch of whining and shit talking at people outside of their respective tree houses.
That pick is hilarious because it's so true.
"In recent years there has been an inflation of strange men who have decided to become an enemy of their own gender. When I say an enemy of their own gender I'm talking about men that will jump to a woman's defense at every opportunity they get, even when the woman is the one in the wrong. These men are known as white knights, manginas, or male feminists."
That's funny. I've seen women on here do the same thing. So now when I see a woman defending a guy when the guy is in the wrong I can now call them a traitor to their gender. These women are known as equalitarians (a. k. a. egailatarians & equail-nazis), female MRA supporters, and female misogynist.
1) Why are you being evasive? 2) What does women defending men (right or wrong) got to with it?