Who is worse, OnlyFans women or the simps that enable them?

Why?
0 0

Superb Opinion

  • 100% the simps. I honestly have no issue with the women, in fact I like that they're comfortable being sexual, as it's something women struggle with due to social stigmas.

    However the simps are the ones enabling all the bad degenerate behavior in the act of showering them with money and gifts. This a nice guy syndrome epidemic and these dudes who are most likely ugly and don't work on themselves are out there feeding the bad behavior. These dudes are worse than friendzoned retards because at least she will actually see the friendzoned idiot. But the simps are 100% losers, and are only there to make men look bad.

    I feel like simps don't understand that this individual they are giving money to actually see them as creeps. Simps are creeps.

    • This is the bot's choice? Wow. So you have no issue with the women doing what they do, but the men are "simps" because they PAY for it? The women wouldn't do it if they didn't get paid !! That's the whole point! LOL Not only that, how is it possible to be a virtual simp, when the whole concept of being one is based on excessively doting on women in order to get laid!! These people don't meet up - it's not a dating app. Every client is "friend zoned", as long as they pay. The guys who pay for OnlyFans, whether it be customized or not, are paying for a service. The women are providing it. Obviously these women are comfortable with their sexuality, since they're marketing it. How do the guys who pays for it make the guys who won't "look bad" ? Nor do you really know that the sellers think their buyers are creeps, especially those women who cater to fetishes and don't do nudes.

Most Helpful Guy

  • Why is indeed my question - but it's about your definition. According to the "Slang Dictionary", a simp is a slang insult for men who are seen as too attentive and submissive to women, especially out of a failed hope of winning some entitled sexual attention or activity from them.

    WHY are you a "simp" if you pay for erotic pleasures, especially if that pleasure is a fetish that doesn't involve nudity? OnlyFans is not real time interaction. At most, it's live on Skype or something I believe, but usually it's just recorded videos which can be customized from what I read. So how is this "simping"?

    I don't have a problem with it. No one is forcing me, or anyone, to watch it, or buy it, nor do I believe the religious bullshit that it's destroying the family fabric (most religions today do that on their own).

Most Helpful Girls

  • Are either bad? One is getting paid to provide a service, the other is paying money to be entertained. Is it any different than an athlete playing sports, or an actor preforming a role?

    • Yes, they are bad, if you can't see why there's a problem

    • Justify your position

    • Men and women destroying their value. Reduced to porn addicts and sex objects

    • Show All
  • I think the simps. Sorry to hop on the blame the other gender train, but if you think about it, onlyfans wouldn't be so popular if there wasn't such demand for it.

Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions

What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!

What Girls & Guys Said

3 11
  • Both equally.

  • Not sure why anyone is worse, in this scenario? The women on OnlyFans are providing a service, for which they get paid. If they want to do sexual acts on-screen for money who am I to judge? They have their reasons?

    As for the guys that attend the site, it is there money, if they want to blow their pay on on-screen sex, so be it. If you don't like OnlyFans then don't go. It's pretty simple.

    • L...

  • It takes two to tango, so both are equally bad

  • The simps for being so desperate and thinking they have a chance with that girl , she is clearly robbing you blind unless you like banging girls that have multiple cocks in them

  • If both are getting what they want out of it then it's fine. It's just like any other kind of service. It's because it's sex related that it's an issue for people.

  • Neither are bad. You know the term "supply and demand."

  • Both are scum. The guy is desperate and pathetic and the girl is a useless wh0re manipulating guys for money.

    • LMAO. No woman is forcing anyone to pay. It is your choice.

  • They are both shitty parts of the same shitty thing. Shit people with zero morals.

  • I'd personally put the blame on the CEO of the company. They made a business decision to allow this. For money. Bad things happen when people choose money over morality and justice.

    • But also, what @worldscolide said.

  • SIMPs. Can't blame the girls for taking easy money.

  • the simps that enable there asses!

    just like no crack dealer out there would make as much money as they usually do if it wasn't for hungry crackhead buying their shit

  • Enablers. If you want to end the sale of something attack the demand, not the supply. If there's no demand the supply will cease.

  • The simps I guess or they wouldn’t be in business

  • men , wife up girls have a good job so she can rely on u not this online cam girl border corn explotation job