Why I think incest is wrong, despite it being two consenting individuals who are not me.


Why I think incest is wrong, despite it being two consenting individuals who are not me.

Because that's not how relationships are supposed to work. It's one kind of love where there should be another kind. It's love that shouldn't be there.

"But love is love, blahblahblah"


Why I think incest is wrong, despite it being two consenting individuals who are not me.
<---You


Then what about pedophilia?


Why I think incest is wrong, despite it being two consenting individuals who are not me.

Those people are just as capable of love, and the experience is sometimes quite pleasant for the child. I'm sure many child molestors were motivated not by malice, but desparation.

What about bestiality?


Why I think incest is wrong, despite it being two consenting individuals who are not me.

Those people are just as capable of love, and claim to have ways of identifying consent. And as you can see here, other animals do it. (but know that animals are also just as capable of psychological disorders as humans.)

What about Stockholm sydrome?


Why I think incest is wrong, despite it being two consenting individuals who are not me.

Such people have genuinely fallen in love with their abductor, and homosexuality was originally considered a psychological disorder too (not that I agree with that).

Where is the line drawn? Do you still think that "love is love"?

And if you want to know why people find incest so disturbing, then listen here. In the sexual behavior category, I once saw a question by a girl asking what to do about the fact that her boyfriend was masturbating to her baby pictures.
How would you feel if you met a guy who's sexual partner was an infant? How would you feel if he insisted that she enjoys it? How would you feel if he said that he could tell when she consents, and that he only proceeded when she did so? How would you feel if he said that they genuinely love each other? How would you feel if he started ranting to you that "Love is love!" and "What does it matter to you what someone else does with their lives!?"

If the answers to these questions were "OH GOD, WTF?!?! THAT'S AN ABOMINATION!" "BULLCRAP!" "BULLCRAP!" "BULLCRAP!" and "I DON'T CARE IF THERE'S LOVE! IT'S STILL F*CKED UP AS HELL!" Then that's exactly how I feel about incest.

https://black-cat16-stamps.deviantart.com/art/Incest-203992290?q=favby%3Asin-and-love%2F63843643&qo=7

https://foedus-stamps.deviantart.com/art/Incest-for-Idiots-278574667

0 0

Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions

What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!

What Girls & Guys Said

1 0
  • Dummy, listen... CONSENTING ADULTS.
    -In pedophilia there is one consenting adult and a kid! So that doesn't work as an analogy.
    -In bestiality there is only one consenting adult and an animal who doesn't consent! So that doesn't work either.
    -In Stockholm syndrome we have one person who is emotionally distressed, thus unable to make rational choices. They are more a child than adult, so that doesn't work either.

    In homosexuality, two gay adults hump approvingly because they are BOTH adults and consenting.
    In incest, SAME thing.

    And you can't start an article with circular logic and not reveal yourself as an idiot: "There shouldn't be incest because there shouldn't be incest."

    Sorry, get a brain.

    • The pedophilia\bestiality\sockholm syndrome part was aimed at the "Love is Love" argument. (but again, bestiality practitioners claim to have ways of identifying consent.) And there was no circular logic. I said "Incest is wrong because it's one kind of Love where another is supposed to be." Like a man trying to use a wrench for an action where a drill should be used. All forms of love are wonderful, but each has it's proper place. (i should probably edit this in.)

    • "Incest is wrong because it's one kind of Love where another is supposed to be." But that's no argument. That's like saying "Black hair is wrong, because white is better". You didn't explain why black is wrong IN RELATION TO the appearance of hair (WHAT makes it worse), you just said white is better (without WHY is it better). So you're basically saying: "Black is wrong, because white is better and white is better because black is wrong." - That's circular! Self feeding argument. Doesn't work.

    • " Like a man trying to use a wrench for an action where a drill should be used." What action? Yes, you never described it. "... aimed at the "Love is Love" argument. " NO ONE EVER IN THEIR RIGHT MIND separated "love is love" from "consenting adults", so addressing it separately is RIDICULOUS.

    • Show All