Why there is still a taboo and/or "morality" regarding sex?

[Anonymous]

Having sex or not... being virgin or not is your choice and no one should make fun of you no matter what you do.

but i keep seeing many comments here that comes from a very
archaic background that " if i guy wait for sex, he is good one " like wtf? what this has to do with being good or bad? having sex or wanting to have sex has NOTHING to do with good/bad. unless someone is forcing/guilting you then thats REALLY BAD !

same thing applies to women, why a woman who is a virgin or have fewer sexual experiance is "better" than the other ones? or she is "not a whore" bs argument.

what is this silly argument some people are making?

please share your opinions freely...

[PrudentGuy]

It's all about power. I thought over this for a long time. Hence be patient and read:

1) it all began when the "upper class" want to have submission from the "lower class", the peasants.

The best written example is the Council of Nicaea in the year 325. Research it yourself and you'll realize it's strictly to consolodate the power of Emperor Constantine, so that he can rule over the Christians and the non-Christians. (Hence Christmas, the birthday of the Roman Sun God became the birthday of Jesus, etc)

2) time passed and the Church became powerful. And this power is "addictive". Think about it: a mere illiterate can stand in front of Cross and command a congregation of fools.

Fact: the two world wars are "blessed" by the churches from both sides. Hence Christians slaughter Christians. But my point is, isn't that power great? That men rush to die in wars?

3) details: how to make the followers submit?

Easy: control the most powerful needs that can drive a person mad: sex.

The rest you can learn by attending Church for 6 months.

4) now let's say, the situation is changed: sex is not monitored by the Church (or other major religions).

Do you think the followers can be subdued? Do you think they could be moved to slaughter men of other races just by mere uniform?

I don't know. I think many would had left and the World Wars could became Word Wars.

To conclude: yes it's 2021. But the Church still WANT to cling to the power described above (despite its dwindling).

The easiest way is to create the cultic "us vs them" thinking: we who are virgin are "pure" vs they who are promiscuous are "sinners".

The rest are as you wrote in the details.

Thus, as long as the Church is around, there will be such cultic separation of mankind. But of course, us who are free, fuck those power hungry clerics and let's continue to fuck! 😇😇😇

[Wowie101]

There is an always will. As long as somebody has an opinion

[Aurora1010]

Just as the people have a right to have sex with any consenting adult so do other people have a right to have an opinion about this topic or to think it is morally wrong.
Some people from conservative cultures want to preserve the morality in their societies as much as possible too, they don't have to copy more liberal cultures and accept what they don't want nor see as beneficial.
Personally, I don't like to judge so much - but also I don't have to respect certain things - although as a human sometimes you can't help but judge. Everyone does it. And i'm sure some of the people who are open to sex judge those who aren't as backwards.

[Aurora1010]

And I bring up conservative cultures because sometimes the people who do this come these type of cultures

[Hyped_up_on_coffee]

You should blame religion. The women who want a virgin husband are usually virgins. The men who want a virgin wife are just sexually insecure if they aren’t a virgin. They are afraid some other man is better at bed than them or that their penis is bigger , or last longer. Also this is a straight person thing. I have never seen something so absurd in the gay or lesbian community.

[Iron_Man]

Taboo is doing things against your will and two women going at it in front of the man for the man naked and doing the dirty deeds

[KananJarrus]

Cuz people don't want to change and are hypocritical.