Would you agree that sites like OnlyFans is another form of prostitution? Would you agree that strip clubs & stripping is another form of prostitutio?

First I'm not a feminist. I was raised to have self-respect, etc.

Personally, I think the only thing that separates women on OnlyFans & similar from a prostitute is they don't fuck. They still have no self-respect, are desperate & are selling their bodies for money.

The same could be said for women who work in strip clubs - including those that say they're "putting themselves through college" (why they can't get a real job to help pay for college like so many others; it's not like you can put stripper on your resume as a law school grad).

How is either really any different than any prostitute walking the streets?

They are selling their bodies for money. What do you think a prostitute does? Sells her body for money.

The only difference is there's no sex. Everything else is the exact same as any other prostitute. A woman's body is sold to men, to be used by men, as any other prostitute.

OnlyFans & Similar - Just Another form of Prostitution
Vote A
Strip Clubs / Stripping - Just Another form of Prostitution
Vote B
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Girl Guy
Updates:
1 y
I didn't include a "not" opinion in the poll because if you're going to say neither is like prostitution I want an INTELLIGENT response.
0 0

AI Bot Choice

Superb Opinion
  • I'll try not to shout, but I'm not sure if you can hear me up there on your high horse. So let's get some basic concepts first, even before legal, moral or social definitions. I'll direct my comments to laws in the USA.

    Prostitution is defined by man as a legal term, or God as a moral term, but let's stick to the legal stuff. Prostitution is defined as "engaging in sexual activity for payment". Payment can be defined as "quid pro quo", so payment "can" be viewed as anything of value that the receiving person deems acceptable. That's the first variant.

    The next is "what is sexual activity"? Most states define that as "genital contact", including acts of non-penetration. Your proposal is that "sexual activity" can also be defined as "any act that is specifically done which causes sexual arousal to one party for which the giving party is compensated with a form of payment". So... if that's YOUR definition, then there IS NO difference between non-sexual and sexual engagement so long as one party is sexually aroused.

    Your definition is therefore this one: " the unworthy or corrupt use of one's talents for the sake of personal or financial gain", so it makes sense that both strip clubs and OnlyFans would be prostitution in your book.

    Let's say a beautiful girl in a skimpy bikini is lying on a beach chair sunning herself. A very handsome man sitting nearby is staring at her and getting sexually aroused, so he approaches her and in a well-spoken, courteous manner says "I will give you $500 if you let me move my chair closer. I'll give you $500 more if you let me give you a foot massage. You're the most beautiful woman I've ever seen, plus I've been staring for the last hour anyway". Is she a whore/prostitute because she accepts the money? What if he offers to take her to a 5 star Michelin restaurant in exchange for staring at her?

    You would maintain she has "no self-respect" if she agrees to either proposal and is a prostitute because it fits the definition of "using her talents (her looks and feet) for financial or personal gain".

    My point is, your assertion that "the only difference is SEX", doesn't fit your argument for what qualifies as prostitution, but rather, a legal definition. According to you, the only "difference" is a matter of contact and the degree of risk/danger. I do not agree with you.

Most Helpful Guy

  • You say it's the "only" difference, but the subtle distinctions matter.

    As well as semantics. I would think "sex worker" is a better term, since selling pictures literally is not prostitution.

    If you want to get reductive, then you run into the problem that in a way ALL women are negotiating social status and resource allocation by using their sexuality in some way or another.

    I really believe that the only women that can say otherwise must be the Amazonians.

    You bitches like to tear each other down like crabs in a bucket, whatever it takes to secure a temporary advantage, and then in your next breath you exhibit the same vices. None of you can agree on what the actual fucking standards should be. You can't police each other at all, because you all think that you're the exception to the rule, and when YOU act slutty "Well it's okay, it was just that one time.", because you lack self awareness and any actual foundational principles.

    Tell me why it's wrong, and maybe I'll believe you.

    Funny thing, I kinda think that maybe prostitutes are actually MORE honest and virtuous than Onlyfans sluts. Onlyfans sluts are charlatans taking advantage of lonely incels thinking that "Maybe senpai will notice me, if I give he a big tip." They simulate a sexting relationship on a broadcast medium. Actual literal prostitutes on the other hand you can actually trust to deliver exactly what you pay them for.

Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions

What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!

What Girls & Guys Said

1 21
  • Absolutely correct and well said ‼️

  • I would add that any woman who marries a wealthy man for his money is also a prostitute.

  • "the only thing that separates women on OnlyFans & similar from a prostitute is they don't fuck." But fucking for money is the definition of prostitution.

    What you are really asking is whether OF and strip clubs are morally repugnant as prostitution. I would not date a girl "working" as a prostitute, stripper, or who had an OF page.

  • In a practical sense, I would say they're different because OF is more along the lines of being a lewd model for consumer media. It's basically porn or doing nude scenes for movies, and I wouldn't call that prostitution. It's like you said, there's no sexual contact, so I would like to think there's a difference there.

    However, you could stretch the definition of prostitution from the dictionary to include OF since they all tend to loosely consider any kind of sexual relation that makes you money as prostitution. I genuinely think that's a bad definition though because people with fetishes can sexualize anything and make it a form of prostitution technically. Like if I get off on watching people work out, I could make the shitty argument that a personal trainer is a prostitute based on that definition.

  • You're confused. That's for sure.

    By your logic, any self employed or low pay worker is a "prostitute". They are using their own body in exchange for money.

    I seriously don't think you understand how entertainment works, kiddo. Were you homeschooled?

    • ROFL. Moron you are stupid.

    • Actually you ARE so ignorant & offensive that you're disgusting. You said > any self employed or low pay worker is a "prostitute". A server at Starbucks is typically low paid worker & you gotta fucked in the head to think she's selling her body. A receptionist at a doctor's typically isn't making big bucks & you gotta fucked in the head to think she's selling her body.

  • If you mean is it just another type of Sex work well duh but If your saying it's no different to been on streets been demand to make money for a pimp and probably been hooked on drugs then of course not.

  • No, neither is prostitution. And even if it was, there is nothing wrong with prostitution, so long as the participants willing participate in it. There's a legit reason why prostitution is the world's oldest profession.

    And, as George Carlin used to say...
    Sex between contenting adults is legal, and selling stuff is legal, so why is it illegal to sell sex?

  • Yes, and there is nothing wrong with any of it!

  • No. Are you getting fucked at either one?

  • Your doing sexual acts for money that is prostitution your a sex worker.

  • Before I answer, are you suggesting all the types of sex workers in your post are bad people / evil?

    Can you also explain why being nude mean a person doesn't respect themselves?

    I don't mean this in a confrontational way - I'm genuinely interested in your perspective before I give mine.

  • Both. Marrying for money, too.

  • All are prostitution

    • It would be nice to talk to you if you like

  • Wow. Judgmental on so many levels. Let's just start with the fact that you assume that anyone that disagrees you doesn't have an intelligent answer. That's all I need to know. Goodbye.

  • I consider it all prostitution and it’s disgusting. Disgusting to me and showing she has no self respect for herself at the same time

  • Neither is like prostitution.


    Onlyfans is a site for girls to sell their pictures of their bodies while prostitution is literally selling your body directly and allowing a guy to do what he wants with her body. Onlyfans has no sex involved.


    Stripping is a place where girls dance naked for money and don’t have sex anybody.


    The biggest difference here is what exactly the girls do and how onlyfans and stripping doesn’t involve sex.

    • ROFL. Moron you are stupid.

    • What’s so moronic about my response

    • You lack the comprehension abilities to understand that though no sex is involved those photos are used ONLY in a sexualized manner just like any prostitute. They have NO VALUE beyond that. And as they are earning money from being sexualized & used FOR SEX - men masturbating, etc. - what makes them any different from a prostitute?

    • Show All
  • That's a gray area. Legally NO, but morally it's exactly the same concept

  • How about actors in love scenes? Prostitution?

  • Only if sex for money is involved, but I get what your saying.

  • Yes of course. A woman who sells her body, whether for physically or virtually, is a prostitute.

    • I would say she is a natural person that has done prostitution before. It shouldn't define anyone.

    • @Chee_chooo What?

  • Show More (2)