Nah it would be way worse. History has shown that. When women get mad they react emotionally more often than not. Where as when men get mad because most of us are taught to be careful most men think first. They then typically move the emotion to the side until they are in a safe place to handle it. The ability to separate rational thought and emotional instinct is part of why men are naturally the leaders in successful relationships. By that same token in most failed relationships the man isn't leading the woman is. Smaller scale but exact same situations are happening to big businesses. Budlight for example. Hired a woman as a lead and in the last 14 ish months she has cost them billions of dollars. Why? Because she made an emotional choice not a rational one. Failed leadership on display
0 2 1 0
Most Helpful Guy
Currently there are more women than men. Mostly because us men keep dying faster, actually born more men.
While a little bit of an analogy rather than absolute proof:
Women as rulers have waged far more aggressive (as the attacker) wars than men.
This can be a little misleading and to be fair the numbers aren't all that high. But the fact remains that when women have ruled, they have been warmongering. Not peaceful.
The other bit is to look at domestic violence. Where again, despite expectation, women when paired with women are the by fair worst offenders. With about 50% reporting domestic abuse (how crazy is that number?).
Whereas as a counter men with men have the by far lowest at... I forget. Single digits.
My point here isn't that women are evil or anything. My point is just this: When put in a position of power and given the ability to abuse it women do so to no lesser extent than men.0 2 0 0
Most Helpful Girls
There still would be those things, just maybe not in the sense you'd think.
0 1 0 0There are an awful lot of terrible, dangerous women in this world.
0 3 0 0
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!Related Questions
What Girls & Guys Said
2 6Woman can be monsters too.
0 3 0 0Fewer please.
0 0 0 0https://www.history.com/news/margaret-thatcher-falklands-war get informed lady also do war.
0 1 0 0Less of everything that is Male Dominated
That would include the good aspects too0 0 0 0If there was more women and less men the women would be sexually assaulting the men.
0 1 0 0As long as there are men, there will be bad men, and thus there will be war.
Fewer men would mean fewer bad men, but also fewer good men to protect society from bad men.
0 0 0 0but it would be a nanny state
0 0 0 0Aren’t we there already?
only if you want to be, you can any you want to yourself
I think there would still be war. But I know all the others would exist.
0 0 0 0
Superb Opinion