No, I don’t think it’s wrong. It’s her body and she should be able to have anyone she wants in it.
0000
Guardian45Guru
1 y
Why? Is that an option that no one told me about?
0000
andy530Guru
1 y
Not at all
0000
CharlieDMXExplorer
1 y
Why? It should be in the human rights charter
0000
Vick2828Xper 4
1 y
It's ok so long as you aren't cheating on no one.
0000
abc--123Master
1 y
Nope.
0000
cootjuhhXper 6
1 y
nope
0000
NominalXper 6
1 y
No, its not wrong. I believe its more rational attitude. But i won't judge the other side-the christians į guess.
0000
riverrat3Yoda
1 y
Nope
0000
tallblondejohmXper 5
1 y
Nope
0000
Anonymous
1 y
Anyone you like? Like a member of the family?
0000
Anonymous
1 y
It's not wrong, per se, but I steer clear of women like that.
0000
Anonymous
1 y
yes you whore
0000
Anonymous
1 y
I don't have sex with people I don't like.
0000
Anonymous
1 y
No, not as long as you aren't cheating or hurting anyone.
0000
Anonymous
1 y
80% of the time, yes.
0000
Anonymous
1 y
Why would it be?
0000
EliseAppelle19
1 y
Because of STDs
Opinion Owner
1 y
There is an invention called the condom
EliseAppelle19
1 y
But herpes and hpv can still be spread
Show All Show Less
Opinion Owner
1 y
Well there’s a difference between something being “wrong” and something carrying a certain risk factor. It’s fine to have sex with whoever you choose to but if you’re scared of taking risk, then it’s probably best to stay on the sidelines.
EliseAppelle19
1 y
Agree!
TheSpaceGnome
1 y
"Well there’s a difference between something being “wrong” and something carrying a certain risk factor." No, thats the same thing, taking uneeded risks is wrong, and Elise, you are correct, condoms do not prevent stds spreading, as all of them spread through the mouth, nose, eyes, etc. as well as from oral sex, etc. herpes can even spread through unbroken skin to skin contact.
Opinion Owner
1 y
@TheSpaceGnome Bullshit. Using that nonsensical argument, sex would always be “wrong” because it always carries risk. Is that what you’re telling every sexually active person on the planet? Sex is a basic human function. It’s never “wrong”. The only question is whether a partner is right for you personally to want to assume that risk. If it’s right for you, then it’s right. You can’t guarantee any partner is disease free on any given day. So if you’re that deathly afraid of disease, then you can voluntarily remain celibate and let the rest of the world enjoy sex.
TheSpaceGnome
1 y
Your reply is nonsense, casual sex is always wrong, but sex within a commited, monogamous relationship, facilitates human needs, with as little risk as possible, and is therefor not wrong. Nice try though.
TheSpaceGnome
1 y
The idea that you should either choose between zero risk, or huge risk, rather than taking the sensible minimal risk choice, is stupid. People should not be reckless nor live in a bubble. Extremist mentality is dumb.
Opinion Owner
1 y
You’re deluding yourself into a false sense of security. You’re exposing yourself just the same in that monogamous relationship because you can’t guarantee that monogamy. Not ever. On any given day, that person could carry a disease the same as any random hookup. You’re making moral judgements here rather than logical ones. Sex is never wrong if the situation and partner is right for you personally. Other human beings aren’t qualified to make that judgement for you.
TheSpaceGnome
1 y
Sorry but none of that is true, the risk of those problems is reduced substancially with commited monogamy via a person who earned your trust. Hookups increase the risk by a LOT, so much so that its like comparing 0.0001% to 80%. I stick to my point that "all or nothing" mentalities are stupid.
TheSpaceGnome
1 y
I would not expect a person who does hookups to understand, as they likely never spent years getting to know a person deeply before so much as hugging them.
Opinion Owner
1 y
Once again, you’re trying to craft your own logic to justify a moral judgement, one you’re not qualified to make for anyone but yourself. Whether something is right or wrong for you is a personal matter. It’s that simple. Sex is a basic human need and people can discern for themselves who is right or wrong for them to engage with. You need to get over your own sense of self-importance here.
TheSpaceGnome
1 y
Thats a very hypocritical stance to have and a sincerely do not agree with any of it.
Opinion Owner
1 y
@TheSpaceGnome No hypocrisy at all. My argument was consistent throughout. You can disagree all you like. You’re still flat out wrong.
Sexual Relationships 
Sexual Health 
What Girls & Guys Said
4 36Not unless you are in a monogamous relationship
No, I don’t think it’s wrong. It’s her body and she should be able to have anyone she wants in it.
Why? Is that an option that no one told me about?
Not at all
Why? It should be in the human rights charter
It's ok so long as you aren't cheating on no one.
Nope.
nope
No, its not wrong. I believe its more rational attitude. But i won't judge the other side-the christians į guess.
Nope
Nope
Anyone you like? Like a member of the family?
It's not wrong, per se, but I steer clear of women like that.
yes you whore
I don't have sex with people I don't like.
No, not as long as you aren't cheating or hurting anyone.
80% of the time, yes.
Why would it be?
Because of STDs
There is an invention called the condom
But herpes and hpv can still be spread
Well there’s a difference between something being “wrong” and something carrying a certain risk factor. It’s fine to have sex with whoever you choose to but if you’re scared of taking risk, then it’s probably best to stay on the sidelines.
Agree!
"Well there’s a difference between something being “wrong” and something carrying a certain risk factor." No, thats the same thing, taking uneeded risks is wrong, and Elise, you are correct, condoms do not prevent stds spreading, as all of them spread through the mouth, nose, eyes, etc. as well as from oral sex, etc. herpes can even spread through unbroken skin to skin contact.
@TheSpaceGnome Bullshit. Using that nonsensical argument, sex would always be “wrong” because it always carries risk. Is that what you’re telling every sexually active person on the planet? Sex is a basic human function. It’s never “wrong”. The only question is whether a partner is right for you personally to want to assume that risk. If it’s right for you, then it’s right. You can’t guarantee any partner is disease free on any given day. So if you’re that deathly afraid of disease, then you can voluntarily remain celibate and let the rest of the world enjoy sex.
Your reply is nonsense, casual sex is always wrong, but sex within a commited, monogamous relationship, facilitates human needs, with as little risk as possible, and is therefor not wrong. Nice try though.
The idea that you should either choose between zero risk, or huge risk, rather than taking the sensible minimal risk choice, is stupid. People should not be reckless nor live in a bubble. Extremist mentality is dumb.
You’re deluding yourself into a false sense of security. You’re exposing yourself just the same in that monogamous relationship because you can’t guarantee that monogamy. Not ever. On any given day, that person could carry a disease the same as any random hookup. You’re making moral judgements here rather than logical ones. Sex is never wrong if the situation and partner is right for you personally. Other human beings aren’t qualified to make that judgement for you.
Sorry but none of that is true, the risk of those problems is reduced substancially with commited monogamy via a person who earned your trust. Hookups increase the risk by a LOT, so much so that its like comparing 0.0001% to 80%. I stick to my point that "all or nothing" mentalities are stupid.
I would not expect a person who does hookups to understand, as they likely never spent years getting to know a person deeply before so much as hugging them.
Once again, you’re trying to craft your own logic to justify a moral judgement, one you’re not qualified to make for anyone but yourself. Whether something is right or wrong for you is a personal matter. It’s that simple. Sex is a basic human need and people can discern for themselves who is right or wrong for them to engage with. You need to get over your own sense of self-importance here.
Thats a very hypocritical stance to have and a sincerely do not agree with any of it.
@TheSpaceGnome No hypocrisy at all. My argument was consistent throughout. You can disagree all you like. You’re still flat out wrong.