The other numbers are also probably even lower than what they show because I was wishy washy at the beginning and chose more "orange" (mostly disagree) when I really meant "red" (strongly disagree). I wasn't sure how the rest of the test was going to be like so I held back from completely disagreeing.
So yeah, basically vanilla as crap lmao 🍦🍦🍦 Weirdly enough, the idea of the emotional connection in a relationship sounds much more appealing the sexual side. I dunno
2200
takumii
+1 y
You sure know your shit. I was like.. Ya I need to put green but which shade of green do I put?
dangerDoge
+1 y
@takumii As a psychology major, I've had plenty of practice in taking long surveys haha
i totally expected brat to be higher from ur stories :P
Azgeda
+1 y
Incoming BDSM talk. The men are surprisingly vanilla lol Quite a few subs too. You're gonna have to explain the appeal of being sub to me. Being degraded just feels like it would... invoke a sense of pure hatred and aggression for a dom but subs like it for some reason. There's no fun being dom when the she's just laying there taking it. There's no pleasure degrading , enslaving , capturing , toying with someone when someone just gives it away. It's like Gary Oldman in the movie Leon The Professional when he was asking "Stansfield: I take no pleasure in taking a life if it's from a person who doesn't care about it." I GET IT... that SPEAKS TO ME. The other way around however doesn't. It's confusing why'd someone just give in and submit.
chintita
+1 y
@Azgeda the amount of vanilla/submissive guys surprised me too. i also was shocked at how high the percent of non-monogamy was for most people, i got 0% on that. how does it manifest? threesomes?
Show All Show Less
Azgeda
+1 y
@chintita threesomes , gangbangs , open relationships , orgies , the lot.
redeyemindtricks
+1 y
@Azgeda Yeah, I don't understand the idea of just lying there and "handing over" submission, any more than you do.
In general, it's like that: Submission is something that's *earned* and *taken from* me. You'll notice I get decently high scores for sadist, too. I do get off on... provoking my man, while he subdues me. It definitely turns me on to draw a little blood from him when we're, uh, "flirting" REALLY hard -- although ohhh boy I'll pay, in that case ahah.
All my life I've been the kind of person who just drifts into leadership positions, and who tends to intimidate others way more easily than I'd like (I remember we discussed this on that thread about negotiating). So, yeah, when someone can bring me down to my level -- *especially* with just a look or a loaded gesture -- that's something genuinely special, there.
redeyemindtricks
+1 y
@Azgeda Also, about the degrading, read my opinion here:
You know. I don't want this to sound creepy but this sounds almost... like an exact copy of what's happening right now XD uncanny! So this is what it's like on the receiving end. New perspective!
redeyemindtricks
+1 y
@Azgeda Happening right now with... you?
Azgeda
+1 y
Not on the receiving end no lol. Not my thing. I'm more of someone who dishes it and here I am gaining an understanding on why it turns a sub on , so I can have a plan instead of throwing shit at the wall and see what sticks. Your stories are like a portal into the mind of the subs. Kinda like Sun Tzu. “If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”
redeyemindtricks
+1 y
@Azgeda Ok yeah that's what I meant. Well, glad I could help. It's always a bit, uh, loaded to try to *explain* sex-related stuff. Sometimes it just isn't possible. But I try to give insight where I can. Specifically, for all of these kinks it's a *good idea* to have trust in yr partner -- but, some of them will REQUIRE that trust, and others won't. The "being degraded" kink -- at least from where I stand -- will ABSOLUTELY REQUIRE that kind of trust and love. That's not the sort of thing you could "scene" with someone -- as opposed to the kinks that are more physical in nature (like bondage), which people routinely "scene" without a deeper personal connection.
These made lol haha I often behave in animalistic ways during sex (growling, howling, etc.). I agree with my number one result, 91% rope bunny. I love being tied up :) and I'm also a brat. == Results from bdsmtest. org == 91% Rope bunny 79% Brat 77% Submissive 73% Switch 64% Vanilla 62% Rigger 56% Masochist 45% Dominant 37% Primal (Prey) 35% Degradee 32% Experimentalist 25% Master/Mistress 21% Brat tamer 17% Sadist 15% Primal (Hunter) 11% Slave 11% Girl/Boy 8% Degrader 7% Daddy/Mommy 4% Pet 4% Exhibitionist 4% Ageplayer 3% Owner 3% Voyeur 1% Non-monogamist
rigger is way to high. I see the fun to ropes, cuffs, etc, but not as a consistent thing. master is way too high. it is defined as someone who takes pretty much 24/7 control, and that is not me. owner is too high. pet/animal play could be some fun, occasionally, but really is not my thing. non-monogamist is too low. Just because I have little interest in promiscuity, that doesn't mean i would be unwilling to bring in trusted people, or have a polyamorous relationship. Vanilla is too low. I am, for all my kinks, surprisingly OK with a lot of very standard stuff. Sadist is WAY to low. I have one hell of a sadistic streak, one that even surprises me. My only real limit might be permanent damage. Anything less, so long as she wants it (note! not she agrees or consents, but ACTUALLY WANTS it) I would consider, if not actively push.
Sexual Relationships 
Sexual Health 
Most Helpful Guys