Did you know that circumcised men have only 20-30% (depending on how tight they were cut) of the sensitivity/pleasure that intact (uncut) men do?

[Anonymous]

[Billlewis]

Even if I were allowed to have penetrative sex (which I'm not -- my only sexual interaction with women is being allowed to perform anilingus for her and licking her clean after she's been fucked by another guy), I've never viewed sex as being about my pleasure anyway; I'm only interested in her satisfaction.

[Dargil]

My observations are that is probably doesn't impede with expansion during erection because, like getting fat, your skin expands as it fills out and will stay that way. My boner was guitar string tight when I was 15. It is the same size now but not as tight.
Besides, like that Bentley Silver Spur I want, you don't miss what you never had. During sex or oral, my penis works just fine.

[Apple1996]

Yes I did know this. It's one of the reasons why I'm so against circumcision

[LaFemmeFatale_1]

I don’t think circumcising is a good thing. I would never do it to my son.

[Asker]

You sound like you'd be a good mom :)

[LaFemmeFatale_1]

Thank you, I hope I’ll be a good one someday

[ZXCwWRQWz]

That's how I last so long. The 20-30% loss in sensitivity lets me go an extra 2 hours.

[Asker]

no, it's 70-80% loss, with only 20-30% left

[ZXCwWRQWz]

Oh, I got it backward! That's especially how I go the extra 2 hours. I am 70% invincible.

[RobT312]

Had no idea …prob a bad thing going forward! Why not stop

[matchrestore]

Yes, and it's one of the main reasons i restored my foreskin. I also advocate against routine infant circumcision.

[Siri137]

Circumcision is stupid and barbaric.

[summiter]

I am circumcised and have great sensation and incredible orgasms.

[EmmaMary]

For some very strange bizarre reason I had already come to this conclusion! lol

[Asker]

I'm glad you agree that circumcision is bad. We need to eradicate the practice.

[EmmaMary]

Well like my husband, our little boy will be allowed to make his own decisions when he comes of age.

[Asker]

You sound like a good mom :)

[EmmaMary]

It's certainly not just through the want of trying... Thank you. x

[MementoMori777]

Yea, that's why I never cut mine lol

[JessicaEarl]

Did you know that uncircumcised men are more likely to get penile cancer?

[Asker]

that is not true actually

[JessicaEarl]

It actually is! It’s called a risk factor, which is not a direct cause, it’s just something that could lead to increased likelihood. It’s still crazy rare. The increase in likelihood goes from very rare to pretty darn rare.

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3139859/

www.medicalnewstoday.com/.../penile-cancer-and-circumcision

www.thehealthsite.com/.../

[Asker]

Then why does Denmark. where most men are intact, have a lower rate of penile cancer than the US, where most men are cut?

[JessicaEarl]

That’s called a confound. It means that there’s something skewing the data that isn’t listed. Genetics, smoking, sun exposure. Could be all kinds of things. It’s important to look at it as correlation vs causation. Causation means it is a direct relationship. I cut my hand because I slid a knife across it. A correlation is indirect. People that stay home all day don’t have as dark skin…it’s not the house that’s lightening the skin, it’s that there’s something else (a confound aka lack of sunlight) that is both associated with staying home and light skin. There’s an in between. This is how scientific statistics are analyzed. A risk factor (lack of circumcision) is a correlation. It doesn’t mean leaving them uncut causes cancer. It means it’s associated with something that could cause cancer (shmegma presence). Circumsized people don’t have shmegma, so they don’t have that risk. Correlation also implies that you can deal with the in between element (hygiene) without effecting the first element (circumcision) and fix the problem. Which is true. But looking at a broad scale, people that are uncircumcised are more likely (by a very small amount) to get penile carcinoma because they might stop cleaning, and circumcised people don’t have that problem. Those at highest risk would be people with developmental delays, or dementia patients in rest homes that can’t take care of themselves

[Asker]

We could completely eliminate breast cancer by carving out the breast buds of little girls, but we don't do that. We could completely eliminate cavities by pulling out everyone's teeth, but we don't do that. The foreskin is highly sensitive and erogenous tissue, and it is wrong to rob a man of his without his consent.

[JessicaEarl]

I’m actually not taking a stance. I was just sharing a fun fact. You said “did you know” and then I gave my own “did you know”. Shouldn’t make anyone upset

[Simslover92]

No I didn't know that. Learn something new everyday.

[vampireelf]

I am from Europe, so i never understood why some religions are so focused on cutting parts of genitals off.

[helva]

I experienced that intact boys have a very more sensitive glans.

[douride2]

Just another reason not to get circumcised.

[Unit1]

Yep. I was never a fan of circumcision. I am uncut and proud of it.

[LiamJHayden]

Not according to this study:

https://www.vox.com/2016/4/17/11439740/foreskin-sensitivity

[AngryCarl2]

I didn't know that and I'm still not convinced. Unless circumcised men have given up sex because it's not worth bothering. Also is that with or without a condom?

[In_Trance]

The fact this meme is from Ifunny. co is all you need to know

[Charliefretz329]

Yes I knew and I want more cut off

[msc545]

I knew that, but men's pleasure is unimportant apparently.

[9214xs]

Didn’t know it and glad I’m uncut lol

[Boysface_18]

Should I get circumcision... my foreskin tight