Should true erotic art be censored?

Why is male erotic art more censored than female erotic art is? ... how is that fair?

Is it considered more "obscene" because of the "external" nature of the male anatomy verses females being "internal" and thus not as much is visible?

... but then how do you explain breasts being commonly viewed which are also said to be sexual in nature by many prudes in society?
Should true erotic art be censored?
Should true erotic art be censored?
A. Yes, all art that does not show a person fully clothed should be censored. The eyes and hands is all that should show in art
Vote A
Should true erotic art be censored?
B. Yes, all art showing anyone in skimpy clothing should be censored
Vote B
Should true erotic art be censored?
C. Yes, all breasts and genitals should be strictly censored and never shown! ... not even in sex ed classes!
Vote C
Should true erotic art be censored?
D. Yes, all breasts and the genitals of both genders should be strictly censored and never shown except in sex education classes only
Vote D
Should true erotic art be censored?
E. I don't believe in any censorship of erotic art, all private parts can be shown, as long as there is no graphic porn being engaged in
Vote E
Should true erotic art be censored?
F. Even graphic porn should not be censored in art. There is nothing wrong with it and it is already easily accessible to anyone anyway
Vote F
Should true erotic art be censored?
G. OTHER, see my comments below, or just open the "Erotic Art Censorship" survey
Vote G
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Girl Guy
0 3

Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions

What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!

What Girls & Guys Said

18 31
  • Don't get why u would, yes maybe people got kids. if not then are they just being weird. I mean nudest beaches n stuff existing so?

  • Crap who to judge first one speak out wothout sins

  • It doesn't matter. It won't change much.

  • I don’t think so cause how people become body conscious.

  • @courtneyjane