Everyone is against female genital mutilation but not many people are for male circumcision. This is crazy. Clitorius has 8.000 nerve endings. The head of the penis has 4.000 nerve endings. This is why most people say women's orgasm ar more intense. But those people don't know that foreskin has 20.000 nerve endings. Should I say that I'm against male circumcision or it's already obvious?
I'm circumcised but I'm against it
Vote A
I'm circumcised and I'm for it
Vote B
I'm not circumcised but I'm for it
Vote C
I'm not circumcised and I'm against it
Vote D
I'm a girl and I'm against it
Vote E
I'm a girl and I'm for it
Vote F
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
GirlGuyPlease select your age
03
Most Helpful Guys
sensual123Xper 6
+1 y
I am against it because the foreskin has lots of sensitive nerve endings. During vaginal sex the foreskin slides back over the glans of my penis. When I thrust into the vagina the foreskin pulls back, exposing sensitive nerve endings, the sensation of my sensitive foreskin pulling back and sliding into the vagina is incredibly pleasurable. The foreskin also gives texture to my penis, which makes it more pleasurable for the woman during sex.
Circumcision also removes the frenulum, the piece of skin connecting the glans to the shaft. There's a nodule at the top of the shaft where the glans connects to it, it has lots of nerve endings and the sensation of it sliding against the vagina is a source of intense pleasure. When I have an orgasm it starts in at that spot, a throb of electricity that shoots down my penis into my groin just before I start coming. That is removed by circumcision.
When not having sex the foreskin protects the head of the penis, which is very sensitive, and helps to keep it moist and conditioned. I think without a foreskin the glans would get very sore and easily damaged.
I regularly wash under the foreskin and keep it clean.
0000
BklynoorXper 5
+1 y
I feel much cleaner circumcised. As people with foreskin carries disease & semen, precum & urine residual buildup inside their foreskin which is very unhygenic & disgusting. Babies are born with foreskin to protect their pink part of their penis which is very undeveloped or sensitive made to protect them from irritations, but its meant to be removed eventually after. Also men with foreskin have harder times being stimulated by the warmth of natural interior of vagina. But if there's moist below the foreskin, most carry bacteria as they live underneath the hood of warm, moist places. So if an uncircumcised guy goes inside your vagina, you're actually introducing new living micro beings inside of your hole. This is the reason many women get pussy infection, rashes, upset pussy, or deseases, or other complications usually implanted by unhygenic uncircumcised men. I love my circumcised penis the way it is. It doesn't have any smell or funky odor & more appetizing for girls to give blow jobs confidently.
1100
Most Helpful Girls
PaminaGuru
+1 y
I think it should be illegal to perform circumcision on infants and underaged boys unless medically necessary for whatever reason (not sure if there are even legitimate medically necessary reasons though).
If someone wants to get circumcised, they can do so when they're old enough to make that decision.
1001
douride2Master
+1 y
Unless it is medically necessary I don't know why any one should be circumcised.
1100
thomasans2
+1 y
I tried to stop them i screamed and crcie. Damn it hurt for weeks...
I am circumcised and quite frankly I find it abhorrent that its practiced in general, but more so because it was done without consent in the west while its out right illegal to do the exact same procedure to women as they legally do to men. Plus John Harvey Kellogg who pushed for circumcision did so because he was convinced that sex and masturbation would create disease and thought that if we desensitized boys life would be better (others thought that if men did not get as much pleasure from sex they would be more likely to focus on work and academics instead (clearly they where wrong). Its insane that this is allowed and no one seems to see the hypocrisy in calling female circumcision mutiliation but then acting as if their is nothing wrong with male "circumcision".
0000
SmoMan71Guru
+1 y
I am against genital mutilation in all it's forms.
1000
madgoatGuru
+1 y
I don't think it does much harm unlike female circumcision but I believe it abusive and pointless.
0000
Welshman2Xper 7
+1 y
I believe that any form of mutilation of a child should be illegal.
1000
GoodGuyBreakingBadMaster
+1 y
I'm circumcised and I'm for it
1100
jacquesvolMaster
+1 y
Nor me, nor our son, nor my dad or brothers were circumcized.
0000
F1shaun90Xper 5
+1 y
Im not circumcised. I don't think should do it to infants at least make it their decision later in life. End the day if your a clean person that showers daily then why the need?
1000
HannajenkyGuru
+1 y
I've only been with cut guys i dont mind it og
0100
BRAPcelXper 5
+1 y
Hand over the foreskins goy, it's for your own good.
0100
ammar114Xper 4
+1 y
Male circumcision is very healthy because dirt and sweat cause septic under the foreskin.. And as you say about how sensitive it is... So i think every man should get it cut.. So that he can last longer in bed...
1100
Sans97Xper 2
+1 y
I'm circumcised, and of course I don't know how much more I could get out of an orgasm if I wasn't, but an orgasm already feels extremely pleasurable, so I can't complain. I've read from certain people, that they didn't feel any change in the intensity of their orgasm after they were circumcised, so I'm not getting too bitter about it. In some rare cases, people have medical problems that come from still having the foreskin, so they have to get it removed later in life, and I'm extremely happy that I'll never have to deal with it, no matter what, because my parents made the decision for me and to be honest, I would be extremely ashamed if had to go to a doc to get it removed, but that's more of a personal issue. So far so good. Why I wouldn't tell the doctor to circumcise my child tho, is that it can't possibly have positive effects on a baby if you inflict extreme pain on it. Like, there have to be some negative consequences because of the pain, and I think it can mess up the mind permanently, tbh I'm thinking quite often if that's the reason I always suffered mentally starting from as far back as I can remember, even tho there wasn't any reason for it. So, to the people saying that it's good for medical reasons, if medical reasons appear later in life, you can still have it removed, even if you're a bit ashamed, besides, you can't just cut parts off peoples bodies, because there might be some complications, by that logic, why not cut a girl's breasts off, they might develop breast cancer.
0000
LegateLaniusMaster
+1 y
No genital mutilation without consent.
1001
DinnyeXper 5
+1 y
Against any kind of mutilation. Circumscision is only warranted when there is a medical reason (i. e. serious problems, like an otherwise unsolveable phimosis).
1011
QuidthonianGuru
+1 y
I'm uncircumcised, and I don't have an opinion. As an adult, I researched getting the snip myself. The long recovery time put me off it.
0000
cupidkissesEditor
+1 y
For it
0201
redrocket68Xper 4
+1 y
Yeah.. I don't see why not. Im glad Im circumcised especially in America Id stick out if I weren't
0000
DecentguyMaster
+1 y
im circumcised and i honestly dont care what other people do with their penis.
0200
TallAnonMaster
+1 y
I'm not circumsized and I would prefer not to have one done to me. In my opinion it should be a choice left for someone when's he's mature.
So I am against circumcision at birth (or pre ~16), but it's their body, so they should be allowed to do with it as they please when they are old enough to realize the consequences.
Most Helpful Guys