- Anonymous+1 y
honestly I don't ever have the desire! For me I'm not into oral but if I was I have a feeling it's like being tickled. When you tickle yourself it isn't NEARLY as funny as when someone else does it. SO I figure if I could lick myself it wouldn't feel as good anyway so there is no need!
0 1 1 0- Asker+1 y
If you don't mind me asking, why you're not into oral?
- Opinion Owner+1 y
Had a couple bad experiences so I no longer wish to explore it!
- Asker+1 y
Bad experiences?
- Show All Show Less
- Opinion Owner+1 y
mostly sexual abuse type stuff
- Nastya Xper 3+1 y
No, that's what you guys are for
4 7 1 0- Asker+1 y
Good answer
- Asker+1 y
You can teach "Udolipixie" and thing or two about loving guys.
- Nastya+1 y
haha wow look at that discussion lol thanks for BA :)
- Show All Show Less
- Asker+1 y
She's an idiot.
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!Related Questions
What Girls & Guys Said
20 2- udolipixie Guru+1 y
Ladies do any of you wish you could lick your own vagina?
Probably just not me as I find masturbation with toys is the best sexual pleasure ever.0 1 0 1- Asker+1 y
I'm just curious, why not with a man?
- udolipixie+1 y
@QA Do you mean why not use sex toys with a guy? If so my reason is because it just adds more obstacles by using sex toys solo I get almost guaranteed multiple orgasms while when using sex toys with a guy most likely I'll have to deal with d*ck snot be it getting a nut bust in/on me ala penetrative sex or oral sex.
- udolipixie+1 y
@QA Do you mean why not get sexual pleasure with a guy instead of masturbate? If so my reason is because of the orgasm gap show during sex and how unlikely sex was designed for female pleasure alal the 30% chance of orgasm while masturbation is designed for female pleasure. Also studies show that for sexual interaction guys tend to get more pleasure than they give and gals tend to give more pleasure than they get such as with oral and for gals masturbation generally results in faster orgasms.
- Show All Show Less
- Asker+1 y
You don't never ever plan on having sex with a guy for as long as you live? Do you think sex toys or her hand can easily replace everyman on earth to where women don't need men, but men need women? Do you think men are not important in society? Besides, sex toys can't hug a woman, or give her children, knowing most women would love kids with a wonderful. it shouldn't seem like only men have flaws in the sex department. Some were born not to have an orgasm, even when they use dildos.
- udolipixie+1 y
Yes I have no plans on having sex with a guy. Egh no I don't think it'll every get to that place especially when it seems to be going the other way with female sex dolls and such suggesting if anything guys have shown over and over that they don't need gals nor do they like them.
- Asker+1 y
So you think guys rather have sex with themselves and a blow up doll than to have sex with a woman?
- udolipixie+1 y
Your besides is a bit off to me as guys don't show themselves to be more desirable in these departments. Most don't seem to be keen on hugging a gal as they show far more interest in busting a nut in/on her. As well as I can get hugs from my family and friends people who likely genuinely love me (far) more than a guy could. Most don't seem to be keen on having children often likening it to being trapped and being a sucker who will get divorced and be buttraped in custody/support.
- udolipixie+1 y
Likely most gals would like to have children with a wonderful guy yet not many gals do going by the fatherless and single parent statistics and how many wonderful guys out there is doubtful. In this regard liking something and the chances of having it seem quite low so guys don't seem desirable in that department.
- udolipixie+1 y
I don't think guys would rather have sex with themselves and a blow up doll than have sex with a gal. I do think guys would rather that sex with a gal would be like having sex with a blow up doll- they can choose her, she has no say in the regards can't reject him, and he doesn't have to deal with her as a human being as the amount of bitterness, resentfulness, hatred, and misogyny doesn't suggest guys like gals they just like f*cking them. I'm talking in regards to guys in my country, America.
- Asker+1 y
That's why gals have to pick the right guy to have a healthy family. Plus is more gals wouldn't focus way too much on orgasm during sex, they just might reach an orgasm. She needs to learn how to relax more her body with a guy. Not every guy is into the kind of sex that you describe. Sex is more than just intercourse, it's the emotional feeling that's behind it. if two people are really in love each other, (during sex) that's the best orgasm ever.
- udolipixie+1 y
Egh I find most gals don't focus at all on reaching an orgasm during sex as they tend to desire a perceived connection and intimacy more than an orgasm. The lack of orgasm from sex for gals is seemingly innate as the female orgasm is not needed for procreation while the male orgasm is. Heck even female consent is not needed for procreation. I find sex to be a sh*t deal for gals. Meh likely most guys are into the kind of sex I describe as it seems most want to orgasm during sex.
- Asker+1 y
Do you also think a lot of gals rather have sex with themselves than with a guy, because they don't need guys for companionship, they rather be closed minded? If so then why do a lot of gals do actually have sex with a guy? Another thing, do you think guys have more flaws when it comes to sex than women do, like it's always the guys fault if she's not having an orgasm, does that mean guys are inferior to females?
- udolipixie+1 y
Different opinions on what is the best orgasm ever as. For me the best orgasm is many. I don't buy into the whole spiel of being in love with and loved by someone you're having sex is the best ever. To me it seems to be dismissing and belitting the orgasm gap's importance as if telling gals to stfu about their lack of sexual pleasure that love should be more than enough and they're somehow shallow or lacking to want sexual pleasure from sex.
- udolipixie+1 y
No I don't think a lot of gals rather have sex with themselves than with a guy as I find gals tend to desire and value relationships, communication, connection, companionship, and intimacy with guys. I find most gals tend to place sex on the backburner and when it's thought of it's not about her sexual pleasure but his and a perceived connection and intimacy gotten from getting f*cked.
- udolipixie+1 y
Though if gals did choose sole with themselves than sex with a guy because they don't need guys for companionship I wouldn't find them close minded...o.O. If anything it'd be close minded to think such as I'd be dictating what someone else needs. If a gal doesn't need guys for companionship than it'd be off for me to think she did and she's close minded for having/lacking needs I don't agree with.
- udolipixie+1 y
Egh..o.O...I'm unsure how you got this inferior and lacking flaws bit. I'm can't see how you got any notion to ask me if I think "guys have more flaws when it comes to sex than women do", "like it's always the guys fault if she's not having an orgasm", or guys are inferior to females" from me stating I'd rather masturbate as that's almost guaranteed orgasms versus have sex as that has consistently shown to be lacking in female orgasm.
- Asker+1 y
The reason I said closed minded cause it would seem like she thinks men are not important enough for her to share her life with so instead she rather fall in love with her hand or toys. Do you think men have more flaws when it comes to have sex compared to women have sex?
- udolipixie+1 y
I don't find that close-minded no more than I find it close minded if she thought men are important enough for her to share her life and she wouldn't instead fall in love with her hand or toys. To me it's close-minded to make judgements on what others find important for themselves, what others need, or what others don't need.
- udolipixie+1 y
Considering that sex is an almost guaranteed orgasm and studies show guys generally get more pleasure than they give I don't think guys have more flaws when it comes to having sex compared to gals. Guys seem to have more advantages and benefits when it comes to having sex compared to gals while gals are the ones with the flaws and more flaws when it comes to sex as generally it's a 30% chance of orgasm for gals and if they do orgasm generally it'll be less than half as many times as he does.
- udolipixie+1 y
Sexual pleasure aside guys generally risk STI and STD while gals are generally risk: - STD/STI (both they are twice more likely to get than guys) - pregnancy - rape - slut double standards/slut-shaming So yeah to me gals have more flaws when it comes to sex than guys. I thought the answer of me thinking gals have more flaws when it comes to flaws would have come from my comment of how I think sex is a sh*t deal for gals.
- Asker+1 y
I'm talking about when it comes to turning a partner on in a sexual way, do guys have more flaws in that area compared to girls? if so does that mean girls are more superior and have a better reputation? I don't want to put sexual pleasures aside. They make condoms or birth control pills to prevent pregnancy. Their are places were people can get tested for STD. So theirs no excuse not to have sex with the person you're in love with.
- udolipixie+1 y
Considering that I find most gals don't care about their own sexual pleasure while most guys do care about their own sexual pleasure guys do not have more flaws when it comes to turning a partner on in a sexual way as I find most gals don't care about it. Hmmm with this whole superiority/inferiority thing...you sound like this VeohTV guy projecting possible personal issues onto my statements. Curious enough you're in the same age range yet more of why I find older guys unappealing.
- udolipixie+1 y
Condoms or birth control prevent pregnancy they do not eliminate it so it's a risk like I said. STD/STI tests are just that they're tests they don't prevent or eliminate it so it's a risk like I said. Masturbation doesn't come with any of those risks and gals have more of those risks than guys hence why to me gals have more flaws when it comes to sex.
- udolipixie+1 y
Egh nowhere did I state, suggest, imply, or mention they are an excuse to not have sex with the person you're in love with. The topic was which gender has more flaws when it comes to sex. I answered with gals since they are more likely to not orgasm and have more risks ala STDs/STIs (twice more likely to get one than give one), rape, pregnancy, and slut double standard/slut-shaming. How did you get they were excuses to not have sex with the person you're in love with? o.O
- Asker+1 y
Are there some guys that you ever found appealing to where you almost had sex with him? Also should a guy feel insult or offend if you rather use sex toys or masturbate than to have sex with him? When two people have sex with each other, it's normal and not everybody get's STDs so I say live a little. By not having sex with another human being that you're in love with, would be such a boring lonely life.
- Asker+1 y
Plus there are places where women can go to get their eggs remove to where she can't children. Also some condoms are very good that can prevent pregnancy.
- Asker+1 y
Since most women don't know how to orgasm, no matter what she does, then it's not the man's fault if she's not turned on, that's what you're saying?
- rotinaj10+1 y
Good conversation
- udolipixie+1 y
No there has never been a guy that I've almost had sex with. I don't do should unless it applies to harming animals or children. A guy can feel whatever he wants in regards to me wanting to use sex toys or masturbate than get f*cked by him. I have no interest in dictating what people should or should not feel.
- udolipixie+1 y
"When two people have sex with each other, it's normal and not everybody get's STDs so I say live a little. By not having sex with another human being that you're in love with, would be such a boring lonely life." Egh I didn't say everybody gets STDs so I'm unsure why you're telling that not everybody gets STDs. Me stating that sex has a risk of STDs isn't stating that everybody gets them...o.O
- udolipixie+1 y
Your "live a little" otherwise it's "such a boring lonely life" is yet more support of why I have no interest or desire in getting f*cked by a guy. It seems a prevalent male mindset for guys to think they know what is best/better and suited for others and to make negative of others' ways. Me choosing to masturbate instead of getting f*cked is not living less or a boring lonely life. It may be in your opinion and you're not living me life so your opinion of it is quite useless.
- udolipixie+1 y
"Plus there are places where women can go to get their eggs remove to where she can't children." That doesn't negate the risk of rape, STDs/STIs, and the low chance of orgasm. In my opinion having to undergo major surgery to lessen one of the risks of sex just makes it that less appealing. I don't have to undergo major surgery to make masturbation less risky so I'll stick with that. "Also some condoms are very good that can prevent pregnancy." Again keyword is prevent..there's still a risk.
- udolipixie+1 y
"Since most women don't know how to orgasm, no matter what she does, then it's not the man's fault if she's not turned on, that's what you're saying?" That's not what I'm saying. Nowhere did I state, suggest, imply, or mention that most don't know how to orgasm no matter what she does. Most gals do know how to orgasm as most gals masturbate and get themselves off and going by studies they get themselves off faster and more than they do when having sex.
- udolipixie+1 y
I'm unsure where you got this most women don't know how to orgasm when I repeated stated most gals orgasm faster/more in masturbation...o.O As for your question it's her fault for not being turned on as it most likely means she's not attracted to him or wants sex and quite interestingly it seems a gal not being turned on doesn't have guys halting the sex which is yet more of why I see no reason to chose sex over masturbation as I find most guys selfish.
- Asker+1 y
Do you think a guy can orgasm faster him him masturbating? if you say "no" then you'll make it seem like men really think of women as important in their lifestyles but women don't think of men as important in their lifestyles. Like for example: women can live without men but men can't live without women.
- udolipixie+1 y
Going by studies guys orgasm pretty much the same two to three minutes in sex and masturbation. Saying no doesn't make it seem like guys really think of gals as important in their lifestyles. What logic are you using to get "not orgasm faster from masturbating" = "thinking of gals as important in their lifestyle"? o.O Thinking of gals as important in lifestyle would come from how one regards gals and desires gals not from whether or not he orgasms faster in sex or masturbation..o.O
- udolipixie+1 y
LMFAO @ men really think of gals as important in their lifestyle when it seems most media by guys and for guys is about: - how inferior, useless, and worthless gals are - how terrible evil gold digging sl*ts and backstabbing b*tches who don't know love that just want to be used and abused gals are - how oh so horrible it is to be gals friends, in relationships with gals (p*ssy whipped/mangina), or married to gals (nagging/henpecked/ball and chain)
- udolipixie+1 y
As for your example I find it quite lacking in my experiences/observations as I find most guys are quick to talk about how gals can't live without guys how we need them to survive while guys can live without gals and that gals contribute nothing to little to building civilization and society. Considering how it's guys not gals that are finding robotic/doll replacements often saying they're much better than human gals it certainly doesn't seem that guys can't live without gals.
- udolipixie+1 y
Considering how it seems gals generally desire relationships and commitment with guys seeking intimacy and connection while guys desire having sex with lots of young hot gal negatively portraying relationships and commitment with gals it seems more like "women can't live without men but men can't live without women's bodies to f*ck and bust a nut in/on".
- Asker+1 y
So you think guys don't have better sex when masturbating like using his hand, but instead he orgasm better while having sex with a woman? And are there some guys virgin guys who never have any plans of having sex with any woman, due to STDs and her sex can not make him feel good, because he does it better by himself? If women have better sex with themselves, do you think women can live without men's bodies but men can't live without men's bodies?
- udolipixie+1 y
Whether guys have better sex when masturbating or orgasm better when having sex is up to the guy to decide. I don't make judgements for others on what is better sex or orgasm. I've never met a virgin guy who never plans on having sex due to her sex not making him feel good as again sex is almost a guaranteed orgasm for guys so her sex not making him feel good would be a rarity. I have met a few who never plan on having sex with any gal due to an extreme phobia and paranoia of STDs/STIs.
- udolipixie+1 y
I've already answered your question about if gals can live without guy's bodies...you really are reminding me of a certain user in your age range, VeohTV who seems to never read what is typed and repeats himself over and over. Perhaps it's an age thing for males.
- Asker+1 y
It's offensive to say maybe it's an age thing for guys? You said women can't live without being in a relationship with men. I'm talking about can women live without having sex with a man. It's also offensive that you find most guys selfish (which is why you refuse to have sex with them), a guy will care about if you're turn on as well. You expect guys to under women better, well women also have to understand guys better too. both genders have to communicate with each other.
- Asker+1 y
okay so you met virgin guys who nevrr plan on having sex due to being scared of STDs, but you for example (part of the reason why you would would never have sex with a guy because sex toys and masturbation gives you better pleasure), I was hoping virgin guys can think sex with himself can give him better pleasure so it won't seem like some gals can live without sex with the male body but no guy can live without sex with the female body. I want things to be equal between both genders.
- udolipixie+1 y
I said perhaps it's an age thing for guys. I don't see how it's offensive in fact considering VeohTV's latest comments to me on another question are more applicable here it seems you are him. Egh most relationships involve sex however for just sex I think gals can live without sex considering gals generally have lower sex drives. It's not offensive I find most guys selfish. It'd be offensive if I stated most guys are selfish as if it's a fact or applicable.
- udolipixie+1 y
"you find most guys selfish (which is why you refuse to have sex with them)" Yeah you clearly haven't been reading what I type. I've repeatedly stated the lack of orgasms sex provides and the risk of rape, pregnancy, STDs, and STIs is why I have no desire to have sex.
- udolipixie+1 y
"You expect guys to under women better, well women also have to understand guys better too. both genders have to communicate with each other." Nowhere did I state, suggest, imply, or mention I expect guys to understand gals better. In fact the genders understanding each other wasn't even the discussion or brought up until you did right now. Show me where I stated I expect guys to understand gals better? ...oh that's right you can't because I didn't. Don't make egoistical claims about me.
- udolipixie+1 y
"I was hoping virgin guys can think sex with himself can give him better pleasure so it won't seem like some gals can live without sex with the male body but no guy can live without sex with the female body. " You don't know every guy so it's quite illogical to state no guy can live without sex with the female body.
- udolipixie+1 y
"I want things to be equal between both genders." Egh equality is suited for freedoms and rights not desires. Bit off to want to things equal when sex is a scenario where things are already not equal. Guys and gals don't orgasm equally or get the same reaction equally ala sl*t double standard so it's quite off to want gals to desire something equally as much as guys when they are lacking in pleasure and it has negative associations.
- Asker+1 y
It is offensive when you have to say something that is directed towards men. Would you like it if I said (maybe only younger girls love to be bipolar and too sensative about claims made about them) You may don't find calling guys selfish as offensive but it is. I read what you said. The bible says be fruitful so you don't necessary have to just not have sex. by saying guys are selfish makes it seem like you're saying guys don't understand women's bodies. Women also need to understand men
- udolipixie+1 y
Just because it's directed at a group doesn't make it offensive..o.O Seems you're really reaching and using quite skewed logic...using your logic if I said cats are cute then that's offensive because I'm saying something directed towards cats. Awh so you are VeohTV as he's been saying the same stuff.
- udolipixie+1 y
It's not bipolar or being too sensitive of me to call you out on your repeated false egoistical claims about me. Most people would call out someone who keeps insisting they know what they think, what they feel, what they want, who they are, and what they've experienced. Doesn't matter what it seems what matters is what I actually stated. Again perhaps stop projecting your own meaning and personal issues onto my statements. LMFAO @ women also need to understand men.
- udolipixie+1 y
Considering that guys generally almost always ala sex I don't see a need for gals to understand guys in that regards. Nor do I see any need for gals to understand guys in any other regard. Take you for example. Instead of reading what I type you go by your intuition claiming to know how I meant it and no matter how many times I repeat it you still insist your intuition is the truth. I find this to be typical male behavior so I see no need for gals to understand men when they don't listen.
- Asker+1 y
So you take it as a joke that women need to understand men? That would prove bad character on your part. You think of men as not important enough to understand. women toi understand how to communicate with a guy in oder to have great sex with him, in a relationship. I'm not talking about random sex, only the female ego makes you want to think that.
- udolipixie+1 y
It doesn't prove bad character on my part that I find something funny. Especially when the reason I find it funny is because of the hypocrisy and lacking logic in doing something. Again don't make egoistical claims about what I think. Nowhere did I state, suggest, imply, or mention the reason I don't find it suitable for gals to understand is because I think men aren't important enough to understand. I did state it's because I see no reason for gals to understand a group that doesn't listen.
- udolipixie+1 y
"I see no need for gals to understand men when they don't listen." /= I think of men as not important enough to understand. Nowhere do I even mention importance. I talk about seeing a need to understand and I see no need to understand a group that often doesn't listen to what gals say. It's retribution not female ego that makes me think that. Ego is about self-importance not seeing a need to understand guys as they don't listen isn't about self-importance that's about tit for tat.
- Asker+1 y
it doesn't matter, either way you look at it, laugh at someone is wrong and it's wrong if someone was to brag about that people being upset about being laugh at. so again bad character. You probably think all men don't listen so does that mean you're admitting that you think more men have flaws when it comes to having sex than men having flaws when having sex. You're putting females high up on a pedestal like they're superior. I find it hard to believe you never even kiss a guy.
- udolipixie+1 y
Laughing at someone to insult, degrade, humiliate, or abuse them is wrong. Laughing at someone's behavior because you find it funny is not wrong. Plenty of comedy is about laughing at others behavior. As for it being wrong to brag about people being upset about being laughed at...egh nowhere did I do such a thing. Just because you say it's bragging doesn't mean it is. I know my actions you do not.
- udolipixie+1 y
So again nice fail on trying to claim I have bad character because I laughed at your egoistical and entitled behavior. Yeah it's such bad character of me to laugh at your egoistical claims about knowing what I think, what I want, what I feel, what I mean, who I am, and what I've experienced. I mean god what an awful person I am for laughing at a random internet stranger's claims about know what I'm thinking...LMFAO
- udolipixie+1 y
Yeah it's such bad character of me to laugh at you saying I should oblige your requests after you repeatedly insulted me, my friends, and parents saying you were glad that I deserved it and you don't care. I mean god what an awful person I am for laughing at such entitled mindset thinking a person can do whatever they want to another and should get what they want from them.
- udolipixie+1 y
"You're putting females high up on a pedestal like they're superior." No I am not. You're the only one talking about superiority/inferiority. It seems you have quite a gender complex as it appears you make almost everything all about superiority/inferiority and which gender is better/worse. I mean really sleeping on the couch being about cruelty and superiority/inferiority and which gender is gods..lfmao
- Asker+1 y
If women wouldn't have such attitudes, they would listen to them more. Both genders have to understand each other more. You want me to respect being on your questions, so you respect the fact that your on mines. Quit messaging me, you know you're pride is too big to admit that the things you said was wrong as well.
- udolipixie+1 y
"If women wouldn't have such attitudes, they would listen to them more." Extremely doubtful coming from you since you project whatever you want and claim you have the intuition to know what others are thinking, feeling, and want. Both genders don't have to understand each other more. It's not a necessity for both genders to understand each other more so they don't have to do. " Quit messaging me, " I haven't messaged you.
- udolipixie+1 y
Don't make claims about what I want. Nowhere did I state, suggest, imply, or mention that I want respect being on my questions...o.O...the one who brought up respect was you not me. My only mentions of respect is poking fun at you using your 'respect is earned not given' when you claim I'm disrespectful to you.
- udolipixie+1 y
Nothing I said was wrong. It's not wrong for me to call you egoistical for claiming to know what I think, feel, and what. It's not wrong for me to call you entitled for saying I should oblige your requests after you repeatedly insulted me saying you're glad that I deserved it and you don't care. Just because you didn't like what I said doesn't mean it was wrong.
- Asker+1 y
sure whatever you say now go away and quit messaging me by commenting on my question. You're a waste of my time
- udolipixie+1 y
It's my answer. I can comment as much as I want. Amusing how when yet again called on your lies you evade. I guess when shown logic you fail. For someone who is a waste of your time you sure sought me out: - you followed me answering a year old questions of mine - you followed me answering a month old question of mine - you followed me on YouTube At least in this case you asked Anonymously I didn't know who you were until you slipped up
- udolipixie+1 y
Continuing to comment doesn't make one a troll. You're really reaching. Trolling would be being hostile and insulting from the beginning...like you were in your question I answered. Trolling would be following a person around and answering year old and month old questions to rant...like you did. Trolling is not simply commenting.
- Asker+1 y
you're still trolling, like you have nothing better to do
- udolipixie+1 y
Commenting on my own answer is not trolling...duh Trolling would be following you around just to be hostile and insult you like you did with me. I did not even know this answer was yours as you asked Anonymously.
- Asker+1 y
You keep commenting so I can receive the message, knowing it has my comments on it too, so yeah that's trolling. You know this person is me now, and even if it was someone else, you'd still keep commenting. After all since you didn't know at first, didn't you kept commenting back to me, because it's it your nature to feel like you're right about everything.
- udolipixie+1 y
It's trolling to comment...o.O...using your logic everyone is when they make a comment or respond to one. It's trolling to make hostile insulting comments which I haven't. That's your style not mine. You're the troll not me as you followed me on a year old question and a month old question of mine to whine, b*tch, and insult me.
- udolipixie+1 y
Again don't make claims about who I am. Nowhere did I state, suggest, imply, or mention I'm right about everything. You're the one who goes on and on about how you're right about everything to the extent that you think you're right about what a complete internet stranger thinks, feels, wants, who they are, and what they've experienced. You making egoistical claims about what I think and what is my nature shows you're more of the one who feels like they're right about everything not me.
- udolipixie+1 y
It's not trolling to make comments. You're more of the attention seeking child as you followed me answering my year old and month old questions to whine and b*tch. I didn't know this was your question ask you asked Anonymously so it's bs to call me attention seeking. Again I don't see this as arguing so it's impossible for me to want to keep arguing..duh. You're the one who sees this as arguing and you're the one talking about being right not me.
- udolipixie+1 y
LMAO @ I don't see this as arguing yet you keep claiming I want to argue. LMFAO @ nowhere did I try to provoke a reaction from you and stated I don't care about what you feel yet you keep claiming I'm trying to get a rise out of you. Laughing at your claims *after* you made repeated statements about what I think, what I feel, what I want, and who I am is not trying to get a rise out of you. It's laughing at the egoism of thinking you know what a random stranger thinks.
- Asker+1 y
Yeah you want to provoke me to get a rise out of me, because trolls love attention
- udolipixie+1 y
Again amusing male ego telling me what I want. You're the one who seems to love attention following me from another question to answer a year old question of mine to whine then afterward answering a month of question of mine to b*tch.
- Asker+1 y
Yeah sure you want to provoke me to get a rise out of me, because trolls love attention
- udolipixie+1 y
Again amusing male ego telling me what I want. Seems you're the troll who loves attention seeing as how you followed me onto a year old question and a month old question then you're teaming up with another user.
- Asker+1 y
you're still provoking so you can have entertainment, that's what trolls do
- udolipixie+1 y
I'm not provoking you by calling you egoistical for claiming to know what I think, feel, and want. What trolls do is your actions of following me because you didn't like my answer on a question and answering a year old of mine question then a month old of mine question to whine and rant.
- Asker+1 y
Oh yeah you're provoking me, so you can be entertained.
- udolipixie+1 y
Amusing male ego of yours telling me what I'm doing. Then again you claimed to know what I'm thinking, what I'm feeling, what I mean, what I want, who I am, and what I've experienced so why not claim to know what I'm doing. LMFAO Provoking you would trying to get you to do something. Nowhere have I done that.
- Asker+1 y
You never loose you're hunger for entertainment do you, troll
- Asker+1 y
You're still wet behind the ears
- udolipixie+1 y
You're the troll as you followed me and responded to my year old question and my month old question to whine and b*tch. You didn't even answer the questions but made your own rant which is what trolls do.
- udolipixie+1 y
Egh finding masturbation more orgasmic than sex is not being wet behind the ears when multiple studies repeatedly prove this. LMFAO
- Asker+1 y
You're still a troll
- udolipixie+1 y
I'm not a troll for answering a question. You are a troll for following me around and responding to my year old question and month old question to rant and argue.
- udolipixie+1 y
I answered the question..that's not what trolls do. You responded to the question to rant and argue not even answering the question..that's what trolls do. LMFAO @ your fail on calling me a troll.
- Asker+1 y
*YAWN* You're answering too much.
- udolipixie+1 y
You're answering too much...says the guy who started two lengthy discussions on my old questions.
- Asker+1 y
You're no better than me, so you're a troll
- udolipixie+1 y
I haven't repeatedly insulted you, your friends, and your family nor have I joined in on others to insult you...seems I am better than you. I'm not a troll as unlike you I haven't followed you around just to whine, rant, and argue. You're the troll as you followed me around and responded to my old questions to whine, rant and argue not to answer the question.
- Asker+1 y
Can't you admit that you're a troll for now commenting to me over and over?
- udolipixie+1 y
Commenting is not trolling..LMFAO I'm not a troll for commenting on my own answer. I'd be a troll for doing as you did and responding to your questions to whine, rant, and argue not even answering the question. I answered your question and didn't even know it was you as you asked Anonymously. That's not trolling.
- Asker+1 y
It depends on how you comment and how many times you keep commenting, now can you admit that you're a troll and I'm only talking about you.
- udolipixie+1 y
My comments haven't been insulting or hostile unlike yours in fact a commenter had said it was a good conversation...until you went insulting me which at that point I realized that it was you who had been trolling me that was the QA. How many times you comment really has no bearing on whether a person is a troll or not as many people have lengthy discussions that aren't trolling. I can't admit something that I'm not.
- Asker+1 y
I don't care you still keep commenting way too much and that can be trolling too. Now do me a favor, stop talking to me on this status and lets stick to the other statues. Of course it would be better if we quit talking to each other at all but you don't want to get on with your life until I've block you so you can laugh about it.
- udolipixie+1 y
I'm responding to your comments so no 'commenting way too much' can't be trolling especially when they are a response. Trolling is starting arguments by posting inflammatory extraneous, or off-topic messages. I haven't done that. You have done that on two separate occasions. Amusing how you keep asking me to stop talking to you while simultaneously commenting on my month question you responded to rant, argue, and insult me.
- udolipixie+1 y
"Now do me a favor, stop talking to me on this status and lets stick to the other statues" I see no reason to do you a favor when you have repeatedly insulted me, my friends, and my family telling me you're glad that I deserved it and you don't care. As for stick to others you mean showing more of your hypocrisy of how it's okay for you to be "commenting way too much" on my other old question you responded to solely to rant, argue, and insult me seeing as you didn't even answer the question.
- Asker+1 y
You're doing whatever you can to defend yourself, so you're trolling. If you believe you're right then why you keep telling me? Of course you find it amusing when I'm telling you to stop because you love it when people get tired of you, so you can feel like you're the toughest.
- udolipixie+1 y
Defending oneself isn't trolling most of the times when people defend themselves is against a troll. Same applies to you: "If you believe you're right then why you keep telling me?" "If you believe you're right then why did you follow me onto my year old question and my month old question?" I find it amusing that you're telling me to stop while you're still b*tching on my other question you responded to just to rant. It has nothing to do with your projection and everything to do with hypocrisy
- udolipixie+1 y
If you believe you're right then why did you follow me onto my year old question and my month old question? Hmmm could it be because you're a troll who loves attention. If you really want me to stop then why are you simultaneously still b*tching on my other question you responded to just to argue and rant? Hmm could it be because you're a hypocrite who wants to feel like the toughest. LMFAO @ you telling me to stop posting on your question while you're still posting on mine.
- Asker+1 y
Why you act like you have to defend yourself? Only a guilty person would argue so big. I still say of course you'll laugh when someone tells you to stop because if they block you, then you'll get enjoyment to feel like you out did someone. it's like a game to you
- udolipixie+1 y
Again I don't consider this arguing. You consider this arguing so it seems you're the guilty person. LMFAO I don't act like I have to defend myself. I chose to. Unlike you I acknowledge my actions are my choices and don't go around blaming them on others. Using your logic if a innocent guy is charged with murder and he protests that he didn't murder anyone then he's guilty. Most innocents defend themselves from repeated attacks that show no sign of stopping.
- udolipixie+1 y
It's really amusing that you the person who has been following me around on my year old question and my month old question and insulting me, my friends, and my family is asking why I'd defend myself...LMFAO Your mind shows even more signs of being abnormal if you're questioning why a person would defend themselves especially when you're the attacker...o.O You're also showing even more of your lacking comprehension of words as arguing is not necessarily defending yourself...o.O
- Asker+1 y
You act like you have to defend yourself way too much, so you must be guilty. I can't take you seriously since you think were not arguing. it's amusing that you care too much about old a question is, that's making a mountain out of a mole. You need to put your ego aside, because life is not all about you. You're the one who whine's about all the things I ever said to you, well you're attitude makes people want to call you hostile.
- udolipixie+1 y
Defending yourself no matter to what extent doesn't automatically mean you're guilty..o.O I don't care at all how old a question is. I pointed out the age to show just how far you will go to seek attention and how much of a troll you are. You're such an attention seeking troll that you'll dig up old questions just to argue and rant about how right you are. Making a mountain out of a molehill is you following me around on two questions because you dislike my answer.
- udolipixie+1 y
I haven't whined about what you called me...o.O...nice fail on trying to use my word. I stated them and laughed at them. Remember how you b*tched about how that was provoking you? LMFAO The only whining done was by you. Anytime I listed your actions to show how much of a hypocrite you are you whined and b*tched about them. I don't have any ego I need to put aside. You're the one who seems to think life is all about you since you go on and on about this revolves around you.
- udolipixie+1 y
I don't have a hostile attitude. Your first response to me was hostile and full of insults...and I ignored them and asked how and where you got what you think my answer was saying. You continued to insult me joining in on others the proceeded to insult my friends and my family...and I didn't respond with insults. That's not a hostile attitude. It's not hostile for me to list your actions to show your hypocrisy when you go on and on about how you're such a better person than me.
- udolipixie+1 y
It seems more supportive of how abnormal your mind is that you think this: "You act like you have to defend yourself way too much, so you must be guilty." It's evidence not how much one protests that determines guilt. It's supports your egoistical nature as you'll likely think anything that results in you being right. There is a clear bias as you're the attacker meaning you'll likely want to evade any accountability for your actions and this will chalk it up to well it's true so no worries.
- Asker+1 y
I'm just gomnna ignore all your comments and still say you do whine, because you have been repeating what I said over and over, and your attitude makes a person what to say those things about you. Like when I called you an idiot, you're hostile, tyrant, etc. That suits you best. You're the one seeking attention by commenting back to me. I only answer your other questions to prove how you have a problem, becuase it's something negative about men.
- udolipixie+1 y
You told me you were hostile and insulting from the beginning because you know what I really meant in my answer. It can't be my attitude when you didn't even pay attention to it instead deciding for yourself what my attitude was LMFAO I'm not seeking attention by commenting back to you as I didn't even know this was your question since you answered Anonymously. The only attention seeker and troll here is you. Just because you think my question was negative about guys doesn't make it so.
- udolipixie+1 y
Asking which gender blocks more doesn't prove I have a problem nor is it something negative about guys...o.O... Asking why don't guys realize girls go after bad boys & guys go after sluts doesn't prove I have a problem or is something negative about guys if anything it's saying guys and gals do the same thing...duh You thinking otherwise does support that you see almost everything as a competition a battle between the genders and about superiority/inferiority.
- Asker+1 y
If I wasn't paying attention then I wouldn't of called you hostile so nice try. LOL And yeah you want attention, you could be doing other stuff right now like being on Facebook or talking on the phone but you want to argue with me, like it's World War 3. You don't want to ask questions that's directed towards women, that's your attitude that would make a person insult you.
- udolipixie+1 y
Oh if you're going to ignore all my comments does that mean you've finish throwing your second tantrum on my old questions? Or do you still have more whining and b*tching about how you're right? LMFAO
- udolipixie+1 y
If you paid attention you would have read what was there instead of claiming that you know how I really meant it so nice try. If you want attention you could be doing other stuff I don't have any suggestions as I don't know what old dinosaurs do in their spare time. I don't see this as arguing. It seems you're the one who wants to argue as you followed me on two old questions of mine to do such. I did ask questions that directed towards gals...duh...which gender blocks more includes gals.
- udolipixie+1 y
It's not my attitude it's bitter resentful misogynists and guys with personal issues that project them onto me such as yourself that chose to insult me. Amusing how you keep saying I made you insult me. I love how you're supporting my opinion on guys and how they tend to lack accountability and responsibility for their actions. You didn't choose to insult me...no I made you insult me because of an attitude you think I have because you know how I really meant my answer...LMFAO
- udolipixie+1 y
Since you're still commenting on my answer I guess you're not done whining and throwing your second tantrum on my old questions. What happened to ignoring my comments seeing as you're asking me to comment by still asking me questions on my old question...despite me telling you I won't oblige you due to your hostility and repeated insults to me, my friends, and my family.
- Asker+1 y
All your comments doesn't do no good because I'm not gonna read them, you're just full of hot air to determind being right all the time, like you know more than everybody in the whole world. You whine.
- udolipixie+1 y
More like you're determined to be right all the time since you're following me around on my old questions telling me how right you are. Way more like you're the one acting like you know more than everybody in the whole world because of how you go on telling me what I think, what I feel, what I want, what I fear, who I am, and what I've experienced. You whine and listing your behaviors shows how much you whine about it.
- udolipixie+1 y
LMFAO @ your newest bs. You're the one determined to be right all the time since you followed me to such an extent. You're the one who thinks he knows all since you claim to know what I'm thinking and feeling despite my protests.
- udolipixie+1 y
If you're not going to read my comments then why are you still posting on my other old questions? Hmmm..could it be because you're a control freak who wants to act like he's above it all when he's really the slime.
- Asker+1 y
I'm still posting to prove how much you're so obessed with being right at everything, due to you thinking if a guy was right you'd get jealous and think that he thinks he's a God. You're no mature than me if you don't know how to ignore people.
- udolipixie+1 y
You still posting shows how you're so obsessed with being right at everything since the only reason you posted was to talk about how right you are. You followed me on my TWO old questions to go on and on about how you're right.You're the one with the obsession not me. Egh I'm not jealous if a guy thinks he's a God. I am amused by the egoism. I enjoy it when guys act like that as it supports my opinion of guys there's no reason for me to be jealous.
- udolipixie+1 y
Ignoring people does not necessarily equate to being a sign of maturity. I'm shown far more maturity than you as I wasn't hostile and insulting from the beginning, I haven't followed you around because I didn't like your answer, and I haven't blamed you for my actions. You insulted me without provocation based on you thinking you know how I meant my answer instead of reading it. I didn't insult you despite how you repeatedly insulted me, my friends, and my family. Yeah I'm more mature.
- Asker+1 y
Of course you don't think ignoring people sometimes is a sign of maturity because you're not mature. You love to whine, by saying I insulted you, your family, and friends.
- udolipixie+1 y
I really enjoyed laughing at your idiocy, egoism, and personal issues so continue posting about how you'll ignore my comments further showing your obsession with always being right. It's such a win for me. Your obsession was already suggested when you followed me responding to my two old questions to whine about how you're right. Your obsession was already proven when you claimed to know what I think, what I want, what I feel, and who I am never considering that you may be wrong.
- udolipixie+1 y
I only brought up how you insulted my me, my friends, and my family because you claimed to be the better person and that you admit your flaw. That was to show you're a liar as those actions aren't the actions of a better person and you don't admit your flaws. I only continue to bring it up because of your reaction to your actions which amuses me and supports my opinion of males. It's really funny how you lack accountability and responsibility for your actions and how you blame me.
- udolipixie+1 y
I don't think ignoring people necessarily is a sign of maturity as some behaviors are suited to be correct. It's not mature in my opinion to ignore someone raping a gal. It's not mature in my opinion to ignore someone attacking you. I'm mature as unlike you: - I haven't assumed I'm always right to the extent that I claim I know what you think, feel, and want - I haven't been hostile from the beginning - I haven't called your way of life garbage - I haven't called you pitiful
- udolipixie+1 y
Maturity in my opinion is not about your own emotional and mental growth but encouraging and advocating the emotional and mental growth of others. I have shown far more emotional and mental growth than you as I haven't been hostile, haven't been insulting, and nor have I shown your obsession with being right (I stated this was only about me laughing at your behavior and I don't considering this arguing showing that I'm not trying to be right about something) You're the one wanting to be right.
- udolipixie+1 y
Again you've proven yourself to be a liar. You stated you were ignoring my comments yet your latest post showed you read my comment. LMFAO It's cool I like how it seems no matter what you do you're amusing and supporting my opinion of guy. You can lie and still read my comments supporting my opinion of guys being liars. You can post without even reading anymore of my comments showing to the extent your obsession is with being right supporting my opinion of guys basically being a**holes.
- udolipixie+1 y
So your next move (?): - lying some more - insulting some more - telling me what I think/feel/want some more I'm amused at which one of my opinions of guys you'll support- them being liars, them being tyrants who insult those that don't bow down to them and try to browbeat others into agreeing with them as they think they are always right, or them being a**holes. I know you won't be supporting my gal pals opinion on guys being kind loving people quick to apologize..they're idealistic to me.
- Asker+1 y
There you go making a list of things over an over, you're whining and your comments are a waste of space becuase I'm not reading them. If people was to respond to everthing thing you had to say, that would be feeding in to your entertainment so you can laugh. You love that our argument is World War 3.
- udolipixie+1 y
There you go lying, telling me what I feel, and showing your lacking understanding of words. Whining is complaining about something and nowhere do I complain. ...o.O...making a list of things I laugh at you about isn't complaining especially when I state those things are supportive. You love that you see this as an argument that's World War 3. I don't see this as an argument so it's impossible for me to love it..duh..and I'm not one calling it World War 3.
- udolipixie+1 y
Again you /= people. This is only about you. People responding to me doesn't necessarily entertain me. People like you responding to me with unprovoked hostility/insults, entitlement, and egoistical claims entertains me.
- udolipixie+1 y
So entertain me some more. Keep posting to further fuel your obsession with being right. It's amusing the extent you think you're always right that you know what I think/feel/want/mean.
- udolipixie+1 y
"You love that you see this as an argument that's World War 3." should be "More like you love that you see this an argument that's World War 3" Unlike you I'm not egoistical thinking I know what others feel. LMFAO
- Asker+1 y
Look at how you spam the page by typing so many comments, you have to be on drugs. You love that are argument is so heating up to where this site is ment to be fun, but your idea of fun is putting others down, knwing deep down you have your own issues. I guess they'll let anybody be a model if they hired you. your personality has no class by wanting people to insult you so you can get in the middle of a dispute. Being brave doesn't mean you go looking for trouble.
- udolipixie+1 y
Nice hypocrisy it's fine when you do it and it's spamming when I do it. So you responding to my questions not even answering them just posting several back to back to back messages wasn't spamming the page...lmfao More of your male ego telling me what I love. I don't see anything being heated up. I guess you do though You're the only one doing put-downs. Unlike you I haven't called you an idiot, retarded, retard, sad human being, garbage, pitiful, and oh so much more.
- udolipixie+1 y
Just because you claim I want something doesn't mean I do. Nowhere did I state I want as you say How can I be whining about your insults and want you to insult me? LMFAO you're showing your lacking logic again. My personality has plenty of class as I haven't insulted you even when you repeatedly insulted me, my friends, my family. You followed me twice after not liking my answer on a question the only one looking for trouble is you. So nice on admitting you're not brave.
- udolipixie+1 y
Your personality showed no class by thinking you know how I meant something (ASSumptions aren't classy) then being hostile and insulting. You show no class by calling someone an idiot, retard, retarded, witch, slut, sad human being, pitiful, pathetic, just because you don't like their answer to a question. You show no class by bringing in someone's parents and insult them. You show no class by talking at a person that you're ignoring. (that's being stubborn and hardheaded)
- Asker+1 y
if a person jump over a bridge would you do it? So again just because you're brave enough to stand up to bullies doesn't mean you look for trouble because if you get enjoyment of provoking them, then that would make youi a bully but you don't care because you think that would be lame. You want to prove you're the baddest, probably because you're use to being bullied by guys in your past. You want to make me feel bad by following you, that way once I stop, you'll think I was hurt so you can laugh
- udolipixie+1 y
I've already shown I wouldn't jump over a bridge because some else does it by how I wasn't hostile and insulting to you from the get-go just because you were to me. This question is inapplicable to me as I haven't acted you as you so it's not like I'm copycatting. I am showing you how your words suit YOU not me. It's not provoking to not cow toe to a bully. Provoking would be encouraging the behavior. I have not done so in fact going by your words I whine about showing no encouragement.
- udolipixie+1 y
I don't care about how you feel. I state you were following me to show you're the one obsessed with being right. I wasn't going on touting about how I'm oh so right that I even know what another person thinks/feels...YOU were. I already told you I don't think you were hurt since you're a guy in my opinion guys have less emotional range than gals and rarely ever feel bad for their actions. Hurt, remorse and regret are words I find generally don't apply to guys.
- udolipixie+1 y
From your words "Being brave doesn't mean you go looking for trouble"...seems you went looking for trouble TWICE and you're still looking. Nice on admitting you're not brave.
- udolipixie+1 y
You went looking for trouble THRICE but commenting on LauraMarx's answer belittling and insulting her for simply saying to others attacking her not to comment on her answer anymore. LMFAO @ you still looking for trouble...you're still not being brave old man.
- Asker+1 y
Laura wants to be a feminist just like you, by continuing to shooting off her mouth about guys are this and that. Only people with so much time on their hands would do that. I know you have a lot of free time becuase you'll argue with me over night with out getting any sleep. You love it when guys follow you that way when they had enough, you'll laugh thinking they was hurt by your comments, because you get enjoyment of seeing guys miserable. That's uncalled for. You're looking for trouble right now
- udolipixie+1 y
I'm not a feminist...nowhere did I claim to be...o.O...Feminism wasn't even mentioned in any of the discussions. She wasn't "shooting off her mouth"...she was linking me to a quite funny foreign comedian it had nothing to do about guys are this and that. You have a lot of free time because you started following me on two questions just to argue without getting any sleep. I'm an insomniac so my sleep time is my free time and laughing at you is an entertaining way spend it.
- udolipixie+1 y
I laugh because of their egoistical and entitled behavior. I don't laugh thinking they are hurt by my comments because none of my comments are intended to hurt. It's not a hurtful comment to point out someone's hypocrisy or lacking comment. I already told you I don't think or care if you were hurt since you're a guy in my opinion guys have less emotional range than gals and rarely ever feel bad for their actions. Hurt, remorse and regret are words I find generally don't apply to guys.
- udolipixie+1 y
What's uncalled for is you being hostile and insulting me, my friends, and my parents. What's uncalled for is you following me on two comments to whine about how you're right. It's totally called for to laugh at your egoistical and entitled behavior.
- udolipixie+1 y
Nice on calling me retarded on your comment on LoneWolf21's answer you're still looking for trouble VeohTV..guess you're still not brave old man and you're still a hypocrite. LMFAO
- udolipixie+1 y
You keep looking for trouble: - you followed me on a year old question responding with a rant not even answering the question - you followed me on a month old question responding with a rant not even answering the question - you posting on LoneWolf21's answer to keep ranting and insulting me - you're posting on LauraMarx's answer to keep ranting and insulting the both of us Yeah I mean with a guy like you how could anyone possibly have a less than positive opinion on guys...LMFAO
- Asker+1 y
You mention me in Laura's comment and she agreed with you so that makes her no better. You have a habit of twisting things around to look like you're the innocent one when deep down you have a guilty conscious. It's uncalled for for you to enjoy guys making claims about you. GAG shouldn't even let you on this site.
- udolipixie+1 y
I mentioned YOU...that's not talking about how guys are this and that...that's talking about YOU. I don't have any such habit. You showed that habit when in your question you acted like I attacked you when you talked with others when your first response to me was hostile and insulting and I ignored it asking where you got that I was saying as you claimed. I don't have a guilty conscious as I haven't acted like you.
- udolipixie+1 y
"It's uncalled for for you to enjoy guys making claims about you." First off nowhere did I state I enjoy guys making claims about me. Second off it's not uncalled for to enjoy as that is not a negative behavior. The negative behavior would be guys making the claims not me enjoying them. "GAG shouldn't even let you on this site." Based on what...unlike you I haven't gone around insulting others and I haven't gone around following others onto their old questions to rant and insult them.
- udolipixie+1 y
The one doing something uncalled for is you. It was uncalled for you to call me stupid, idiot, retarded, retard, witch, slut, pathetic, pitiful, garbage, sad human being, and so on just because you didn't like my answer to who sleeps on the couch when snoring being 'if it's his house his rules and if it's my house my rules so he'll sleep on the couch if he snores'. It was uncalled for you to bring in my parents and insult them. It was uncalled for you to make claims about me.
- udolipixie+1 y
It's not uncalled for me to laugh at your entitled behavior thinking I should do whatever you want after you repeatedly insulted and belittled me saying you're glad I deserved it and you don't care. It's not uncalled for me to laugh at your egoistical behavior thinking you know what I think, what I feel, what I want, what I mean, who I am, and what I've experienced.
- udolipixie+1 y
It's not uncalled for me to enjoy something unless that something is intended to hurt others or is being enjoyed because it hurts others. Laughing at claims others make about me is not intended to hurt others nor is it enjoyed because it hurts others. It's enjoyed because how egoistical the claims are. So nice fail on how you're the innocent one. Just like nice fail on how you're the better person. LMFAO
- Asker+1 y
I'm just trying to understand you better, that's why I mention your parents becuase a normal person would think (where is you coming from) with your insane personality. And yeah you did mention me (not by name ) but you mention how I got upset in our every first argument and you enjoyed every minute of it because you have no conscious.
- udolipixie+1 y
LMFAO @ your lies at you're just trying to understand me better. when just on another users answer that said he sees no point in arguing you posted "you can't tell udolipixie that, she belongs in a zoo." Telling another user that I belong in a zoo when I wasn't even being discussed...is not trying to understand me. It is being a hostile insulting whiner who loves to argue. It's nice
- udolipixie+1 y
For most people my personality is normal it's normal to laugh at egoistical and entitled behavior like I said most comedies have humorous characters with such behaviors. I enjoyed every minute of laughing at how upset you got when your behavior was called out because it was funny. The one with no conscious seems to be you going by how you follow me around to insult me saying you're glad and you don't care. You seemed to enjoy every minute of that and your actions were intended to hurt.
- Asker+1 y
You wouldn't dare say it to my face, if you saw me in person, that you enjoyed laughing at me. You're twisting things around again by saying I havew no conscious, well you gave me a mean answer, so that's why I answer back in mean way. You don't know how to give respect in order to get it. Of course only you find it funny by me wanting to understand you more, knowing you think it's lame. something is wrong with you, get some help. If your parents raised you like this, they have failed.
- udolipixie+1 y
I would say it to your face though again amusing male ego of yours to tell me what I'd do. You're the only one twisting things around. You even twisted around my answer because you knew how I meant it. I didn't give a 'mean answer' you created one because you projected your bs since you knew how I meant it. Repeatedly insulting someone and being glad about it saying they deserved it and you don't care shows you have no conscious.
- udolipixie+1 y
"Of course only you find it funny by me wanting to understand you more, knowing you think it's lame" No I find it funny that here you claim to want to understand me more while you are simultaneously on another answer calling me an animal and saying I belong in a zoo. I think it's hypocritical and two-faced of you. As well how can you possibly understand me more when you don't listen to my answers instead twist them around and tell me what I think, feel, and want.
- udolipixie+1 y
Nothing is wrong with me. It's normal to laugh at egoistical and entitled behavior. It's normal to not oblige the requests of someone who has insulted and degraded you and never apologized for it but says you deserved it. The only abnormal thing I've done is not be hostile and insulting to you when you were to me and continue to be so.
- udolipixie+1 y
My parents raised my quite right as I haven't been hostile or insulting to you. More like if your parents have raised you like this they failed. Did your parents raise you to be hostile and insulting from the get-go? Did your parents raise you to think you know what a random stranger thinks, feels, wants, and means? Did your parents raise you to insult others, their friends, and their family because you don't like their answer?
- udolipixie+1 y
Did your parents raise you to follow others around arguing and degrading them? Did your parents raise you to think that you can do and say whatever you want to a person and that person will still do what you ask them to? Did your parents raise you to blame others for your actions? Did your parents raise you to think you're always right and know what's best for others? Did your parents raise you to join in on insulting someone with others?
- Asker+1 y
Others, you're the only person I've been arguing with the longest. You turn this wonderful website into mess. It's suppost to be fun Your parents didn't teach you to get on with your life and not be hung up on one person. Of course you're gonna twist things around and say what I've been doing just so you can think of yourself as always the innocent one.
- udolipixie+1 y
It's fun for me to laugh at your egoistical behavior at claiming to know what I think and at your entitled behavior at thinking I should oblige your requests after you repeatedly insulted me and joined in with others to insult me. My parents taught me not to be dominated and bullied. Your parents didn't teach you to get on with your life and not be hung up on one person since you followed me TWICE after disliking my answer. Of course you call it twisting to say this applies more to you.
- udolipixie+1 y
I am the innocent one here. Was I hostile and insulting to you from the beginning? No but you were. Did I repeatedly insult you calling you things like idiot, retard, slut, garbage, and pathetic? No but you did. Did I start insulting your parents? No but you did. Did I start insulting your friends? No but you did. Did I start telling you how awful of a person you are and how awful of a partner you'd be? No but you did.
- udolipixie+1 y
It's funny how you like to say it's "twisting" to show that this applies more to you. You following me twice to rant and argue shows it's more that your parents didn't teach you to get on with your life and not be hung up on one person. I guess you call it twisting so you don't have to face your actions and can pretend to be the innocent one here. Yeah it's so awful of me to laugh at your claims/insults to me. LMFAO
- Asker+1 y
You've got to be a sad person which is why you love to manipulate conversations so you can make it seem like you're not guilty. You'd love to make men be upset for your enjoyment, that's not normal for a human.
- udolipixie+1 y
You're the only one manipulating the conservation claiming you know how I really mean things. I haven't manipulated anything. Everything I've said is true. Show me what I've manipulated...oh that's right nothing. Again you /= men. This is about YOU not men. This is about YOUR egoistical behavior not men. This is about YOUR entitled behavior not men. Enjoying making you upset due to your actions isn't me loving to make guys upset.
- udolipixie+1 y
* edit "Enjoying you being upset due to your actions towards me isn't me loving to make guys upset" It's quite normal for me to enjoy you upset when you've repeatedly insulted me, my friends, and my family saying you're glad that I deserved it and you don't care. lol @ you trying to say most people don't enjoy it when someone who has attacked them is upset.
- udolipixie+1 y
LMFAO @ you admitting that you're upset. It wasn't my intention to make you upset. My intention was to laugh at your bs egoistical claims about what I think, what I feel, and who I am and to use your entitled insulting behavior to support my opinion on guys. However you being upset over this is quite enjoyable to me. To quote your words "I'm glad" and "you deserved it". Seems like karma on you for all the unprovoked insults you made just because you thought you know how I really mean it.
- udolipixie+1 y
LMAO @ you still pulling this bs of me being the guilty. Guilty of what? Laughing at the lies and insults you spew at me...lol it seems you're really reaching there. You're the only guilty one here. YOU were hostile and insulting from the beginning NOT me. YOU repeatedly insulted others friends and parents NOT me. YOU responded to old questions to argue about how right you are NOT me. And you started all this bs because you thought you knew how I really meant my answer.
- Asker+1 y
I will take our argument to just one question that why I won't be arguing with you on different other questions. I still say you're a sad person who loves to make guys upset so you can laugh
- udolipixie+1 y
Again this is about YOU. YOU /= guys. I have no intention of making you upset laughing at your egoistical and entitled behavior was due to it being funny. It's so funny how you're twisting this so it's because you're an hostile insulting hypocrite who whined and b*tched following me around nah it's because you're a guy You're the one who insulted me so it seems you like to try to make people. You're such a sad person for being so old and following me around on old questions to whine and b*tch.
- Asker+1 y
No you don't say huh. *facepalm*
- udolipixie+1 y
Rollseyes and facepalm. A 5 year old seems more mature than you. This is about YOU not guys but it's not unexpected that you'll twist and lie to evade any accountability for your actions.
- Asker+1 y
Don't even pull that "this is about me and not guys" I've seen your questions you mentioning about guys. But all you'll do is just twist this around, cause you're nuts.
- udolipixie+1 y
Don't even pull that bs bringing up my questions which also mention gals. You're the one twisting things. My questions have nothing to do with this discussion with YOU. This is all about YOU and how you decided to be hostile and insulting to me because of an answer of mine on your question since you supposedly knew how I meant it.
- udolipixie+1 y
You're the one's who is nuts claiming to know what I feel, think, want, and mean. My questions have nothing to do with this except YOU responding to them to rant and argue bout my answer on your question you disliked since you knew how I meant it. This is about YOU. This is about YOU insulting me. This is about YOU insulting my friends. This is about YOU insulting my family. This is about YOU following me around trolling because you disliked my answer on a question.
- udolipixie+1 y
This is about YOU. It's totally expected that you want to bullsh*t, lie, and twist this about being about guys since you seem to be nuts and dislike admitting any flaws. More proof of how nuts you are is how you think my old questions have anything to do with you being an insulting hostile hypocrite who followed me around and trolled me because he's obsessed with being right and projected his personal issues onto my answer.
- Asker+1 y
*facepalm* nut brain
- udolipixie+1 y
Nice on admitting that you have a nut brain. It's quite looney for you to say this is about guys and not you because of my old questions which talk about both gender.
- udolipixie+1 y
Yeah it was totally nut brain of you to say isn't about you and how you insulted me, followed me, and trolled me but instead about guys because of my moth old question asking which gender blocks more and why don't guys realize they do similar things as gals do.
- udolipixie+1 y
It was really nut brain of you to claim you know what I think, what I feel, what I want, what I mean, and what I've experienced. Most psychologists would call that a mental disorder of yours. It was completely nut brain of you to say I should be like normal people would oblige your requests after you repeatedly insulted not only me but my friends and family all while saying I deserved it you're glad, you're not sorry and you don't care. Revenge shows most wouldn't oblige.
- Asker+1 y
just by you giving me long comments, makes you a nut brain. You're so very hard to make yourself seem right.
- udolipixie+1 y
You're a nut brain as you posted long comments on my questions as well. You try so very hard to make yourself seem right as you followed me twice on my old questions to rant and argue about how you're right. I'm not doing anything to make myself seem right. I'm listing your actions and how nut brain it was.
- udolipixie+1 y
It makes you a nut brain just by you thinking giving long comments makes a person a nut brain. LMFAO You thinking such a thing just proves how hard you try to make yourself seem right.
- Asker+1 y
nutty aren't you
- udolipixie+1 y
Nutty aren't you thinking you know what a random stranger on the internet thinks, feels, and wants. LMFAO
- Asker+1 y
It's hard to argue with a nim nut
- udolipixie+1 y
Hence why I haven't been arguing with you as like I said I don't see this as arguing. LMFAO
- Asker+1 y
Now you see why I call you a nim nut? You don't even know were arguing. *facepalm*
- udolipixie+1 y
We are not arguing as that's giving reasons or citing evidence in support of an idea, action, or theory we disagree on usually with the aim of persuading others to share one's view. We haven't done that. You have been insulting me and making egoistical claims while I laugh at them. That's not arguing...nim nut. The only one 'arguing' is you. Do tell what are we supposedly 'arguing' about what is the topic that we disagree on that we are giving reasons/evidence for?
- Asker+1 y
You can't deny the fact that you're a nim nut
- udolipixie+1 y
I can deny it as nowhere have I shown such. You can't deny that you have no support of how I"m a nim num. LMFAO In fact in the other discussion I asked you how and you couldn't give an answer while I can provide lots and lots and lots of ways on how you're a nim nut: - claiming to know what a random internet stranger thinks, feels, wants, and who they are - claiming most normal people would do whatever a person who has repeatedly insulted them says
- Asker+1 y
You have a lot to learn about life. You'll probably argue with 90 something year old man if you had the chance, knowing you can't tell him nothing cause he has seen it all and heard it all.
- udolipixie+1 y
Again I don't see this as arguing so that's not applicable to me. You're the one who appears to have a lot to learn about life as you're the one who sees this as an argument NOT me and you're the one who followed me TWICE on old questions to argue and rant because you didn't like my answer on an entirely different question. Egh being 90 years old doesn't mean one has seen and heard it all. There are likely few people that have seen it all or heard it all much less both.
- udolipixie+1 y
What it seems you have to learn about life: - Hostility and insults is not the suited way to communicate Did your parents teach you to start off communication with insults? - You're being spoiled/entitled to treat others however you want and think they will oblige your requests Did your parents teach you that you can mistreat others and they'll still do what you want?
- udolipixie+1 y
More of what it seems you have to learn about life: - You're responsible for your own actions Did your parents teach you to blame how you choose to behave on others? - You're not always/mostly right Did your parents teach you that you are never wrong to the extent that you think you know what a random stranger thinks/feels? - Not everything is an argument Did your parents teach you if anyone says something you dislike or disagrees with you they're arguing and you must follow them hounding them
- Asker+1 y
I'm not gonna waste my time arguing with you on what an argument is, you're chaos. If you had the chance to argue with an old man (who is 90 years old) I'm sure you would. He has seen it all and heard it all.
- udolipixie+1 y
Seems less like I'm chaos and more like you're not going to waste your time as then you'd be in the position to admit that we're not arguing since you making egoistical claims that I laugh at is not arguing.
- udolipixie+1 y
"If you had the chance to argue with an old man (who is 90 years old) I'm sure you would. He has seen it all and heard it all." This is more fitting for YOU since: YOU see this as arguing not me so it's more fitting for you. YOU seem so obsessed with being right you followed me TWICE on old questions to rant and argue. YOU think you are so right to the extent to make claims about what I think, what I feel, what I want, what I mean, and what I know.
- udolipixie+1 y
You being sure about what I would argue when I haven't been arguing at all so how would you have any inkling to what I do argue shows how leaping at the chance to argue with an old man is more fitting for you who seems to be quite the argumentative, obsessed with being right egoist.
- Asker+1 y
you would love to argue with an old man, (thinking his words is above his) knowing he has seen it all and heard it all.
- udolipixie+1 y
How do you know what I would love to do? That you're claiming I would love to do this shows you're the one who is more fitting to love to argue with an old man. You're the one seeing this as arguing showing you want to argue. You're the one who followed me TWICE on old questions to argue showing you're prone and eager to argue even when not given the chance.
- udolipixie+1 y
@VeohTV You seem to be quite serious with your trolling or that obsessed with being right that you're going back to my answers on questions way way way back a year as they're not even dated. That you will go to such extents shows loving to argue with an old man is more fitting for you not me.
- Asker+1 y
You would love to argue with a man who is old enough to be your great grandfather, knowing he has seen it all and heard it all, all he can do is pray for you. You would love to think your words is above his. You been arguing with me for a long period of time so that's how I know, even though you don't have sense enough to know about an argument.
- udolipixie+1 y
I haven't been arguing nor see this as arguing (laughing at your claims and bs isn't arguing) so your claim suits YOU not me. You're the only one arguing and seeing this as arguing...showing you'll argue even when there is no one to argue with or someone isn't arguing back. You're the one who followed me TWICE on old questions to argue...showing the lengths you'll go to since you didn't even answer the questions only responding to argue.
- Asker+1 y
Oh No, not you again. *facepalm*
- udolipixie+1 y
"Oh no not you again. *facepalm*" is more applicable to me since you intentionally followed me TWICE on a year old question and a month old question to argue and insult me.
- Asker+1 y
Oh no, not you again, knowing you keep commenting back to me, right now. You give a person a reason to comment on your questions, and it's retarded that you think, the age of a question is an issue. How many times do I have to say that?
- udolipixie+1 y
I didn't give you a reason. You invented the reason claiming you knew how I really meant it...o.O. I stated the issue is age of the question AND how you didn't even answer the question but chose to respond to insult me and argue about something else shows how obsession you are.
- Asker+1 y
Your a disgrace.
- udolipixie+1 y
Not saying much coming from a hostile narrow-minded hypocrite who blames others for his actions.
- Asker+1 y
Nastya is more woman than you.
- udolipixie+1 y
In your opinion. Considering you're a hostile narrow-minded hypocrite who blames others for his actions your opinion is cowsh*t and bullsh*t.
- Asker+1 y
- udolipixie+1 y
None of that has anything to do with how you started off insulting and being hostile because of you claimed to know how I really meant my answer then proceeded to follow me on very old questions of mine to repeatedly insult me, my friends, and my family. It's not surprising you think feminism is evil since you claim it's hating men to not want to be caregivers to random males and you seem to prefer utter domination considering how you tell me what I think/feel/want/mean.
- Asker+1 y
yeah the devil is getting a headache when you talk about the bible, cause Satan knows that's his weak spot
- udolipixie+1 y
So not only do you post links to nonsensical bs you also spew them. LMFAO
- Asker+1 y
You're words think it can over come God, but it won't. Satan tried to question God and wanted to take the throne in heaven, but God kicked satan out of heaven.
- udolipixie+1 y
Cool nonsensical route you're going. My words do overcome your logic. You have a serious problem by claiming to know what others think/feel/want/mean.
- Asker+1 y
Well if it's nonsense, then check this out. link
- udolipixie+1 y
Still nonsense and has nothing to do with my posts. You have a serious problem by claiming to know what others think/feel/want/mean. That you react hostility and insulting to perceived attacks because you know how others really mean things suggests mental instability.
- Asker+1 y
You still can't deny the bible, you're negative opinions about men wants to make your argument over turn someone that wants to tell you right by you shouldn't think the way you do towards men. That's something satan will put in your soul.
- udolipixie+1 y
The bible has nothing to do with this and satan didn't put anything in my soul. Just because you think my opinions about guys are negative doesn't mean their satanic or that they are man hating. You can have negative opinions without having hatred. Especially when those negative opinions are about certain types.
- udolipixie+1 y
You're the one who seems to have satan put something in their soul as god is the only all-knowing one so it's quite satanic of you to think you know how others think/feel/want/mean. Do tell what is so satanic about my opinions on guys? Oh that's right nothing because you can't even tell me what's so man-hating about them because you just say it is since anything remotely negative about guys no matter how few is man hating. LMFAO
- Asker+1 y
You're words will never be right over the bible, so just face the facts.
- udolipixie+1 y
My words don't protest the bible so them being right/wrong over it doesn't come into play. You're the one not facing facts. My words have nothing to do with the bible. You have a serious problem by claiming to know what others think/feel/want/mean.
- Asker+1 y
Yes you are trying to argue the bible, if you wasn't then you wouldn't have such a negative attitude
- udolipixie+1 y
I'm not trying to argue the Bible. My words don't even mention the Bible...o.O How am I trying to argue against something I don't even mention? LMFAO @ your bs. Having a negative attitude /= trying to argue the bible. Using your 'logic' someone who is having a bad day is trying to argue the bible. LMFAO
- udolipixie+1 y
Show me where I am trying to argue the Bible...oh that's right you can't because I didn't. I am talking about YOU not the Bible. Pointing out to you that your Bible comments has nothing to do with my answer or response is not trying to argue the Bible. Perhaps you have such a God complex that you think speaking against you is trying to argue the Bible. You already professed to claiming to know what others think, feel, want, mean, what happened to them, and what they will do. LMFAO
- udolipixie+1 y
Me finding masturbation with toys the best sexual pleasure ever is not trying to argue the bible. Me finding you delusional because you claim to know what others think/feel/want/mean is not trying to argue the Bible. Me finding you a hostile insulting hypocrite because you spew Biblical quotes after unprovokingly insulting me, my friends, and my family because you didn't like my answer then following me on year old questions to rant and further insult is not trying to argue the Bible.
- udolipixie+1 y
Instead of quoting unrelated Biblical quotes you would be suited to reread them yourself as unlike you: I am the bigger person as I haven't stooped to your level as unlike you: - I haven't been hostile from the beginning - I haven't been insulting from the beginning - I haven't insulted you, your friends, your family - I haven't joined in on others insulting you - I haven't called your way garbage - I haven't repeatedly called you retarded and retard
- Asker+1 y
satan is making you have an ego of wanting to say whatever you can just to make it feel like you won something
- udolipixie+1 y
You're the one with ego claiming to know what others think, feel, want, mean, do, and will do. You're the only one talking about winning and regarding this as something to win.
- udolipixie+1 y
I've repeatedly said I don't see this as something to win so again LMFAO @ your cowsh*t and bullsh*t. Seems more like Satan is making you have an ego of wanting to say whatever you can just to feel like you've won by how you followed me around on year old questions to rant/argue while insulting me, my friends, and my family and how you continuously bring me up for no reason other than to talk sh*t about me to others. Your behavior is more akin to Satan than mine.
- udolipixie+1 y
LMFAO @ how your statements apply more to you than me. You're the one with the ego of wanting to say whatever you can just to make it feel like you won something.
- Asker+1 y
satan is also laughing cause he's knows the more you keep having an ego the more you leaning closer towards being in his dark kingdom and away from god
- udolipixie+1 y
Seems like Satan is laughing at you since you're with the ego claiming to know what others think, feel, mean, want, do, and will do- things only God has knowledge of. Are you under the impression you're a mind reader and God?
- Asker+1 y
you think just because someone does something then you should do it too so yeah satan is laughing at you
- udolipixie+1 y
That's clearly not what I think...though nice ego of yours telling me what I think. If I thought that then why didn't I insult you, your friends, and your family when you have repeatedly done that to me? Your logic is quite off it's not satan worthy to be a copycat.
- Asker+1 y
you think just because someone does means you have to do it too, I denounce you satan,
- udolipixie+1 y
If I think just because someone does something then I should do it too then why haven't I did what you did. Why haven't I followed you around on year old questions to insult you? Why haven't I repeatedly brought you to others to talk sh*t about you? Why haven't I repeatedly called you retarded?
- udolipixie+1 y
Again do you think you're a mind reader to tell me what I think?
- udolipixie+1 y
Your logic is amusing if thinking because someone does something then I should do it too makes one Satan what does your behavior make you? What does going around insulting a person, their friends, and their family make you? What does going around talking sh*t about someone make you? What does claiming to know what that person thinks, feels, means, wants, does, and will do make you? What does not listening and claiming you know how they really meant it make you?
- udolipixie+1 y
What does you claiming to have the powers of God- knowing what a person thinks, feels, means, wants, does, and will do- make you?
- Stacyzee Editor+1 y
No, I'm not big on masturbation.
But I am big on having my guy explore and play with me.0 2 0 0 - PinkAcid Guru+1 y
that would be utterly disgusting, no thank you
2 0 1 0- Asker+1 y
Not if you wash down there.
- PinkAcid+1 y
no I just mean the thought of licking a vagina is disgusting as I'm straight, just as the thought of sucking any **** even your own isn't appealing to you as you're straight.
- Daph81 Guru+1 y
*imagines a cat sitting in a corner licking its own balls*
4 1 0 0- Asker+1 y
Okay but what about if you wanted to?
- Daph81+1 y
not worth the neck pain, I guess... Having a guy do it is a lot better. There's the factor of not knpwing what comes...
- Asker+1 y
Yeah I agree with you.
- iPood Yoda+1 y
I could if I wanted do. I did gymnastics for 14 years so I can pretty much contort myself into shape I want to. I have no desire to lick myself though.
0 0 0 0- Stacyzee+1 y
:O impressive
- Blondeandfree Yoda+1 y
I usually French kiss my boyfriend after he eats me out so I have tasted my vag juices and let me tell you that it tastes great.
1 5 0 0- Asker+1 y
WOW, you said a mouth full. lol
- Flippydaydream Xper 7+1 y
I don't desire that no...not so much, id imagine the cramping and back pain, would override any pleasure anyway
0 0 0 0 - coll3199 Xper 4+1 y
Yesssss
1 1 0 0- Asker+1 y
why
- coll3199+1 y
Because it feels really good and some guys aren't willing to do it.
- Asker+1 y
So you're saying women are more superior to men to where a woman can please a man, but men can't please a woman?
- Show All Show Less
- coll3199+1 y
No not at all! When a guy does it it's great! And he has just as much ability to please me as I do him. I'm just saying some guys don't like going down on girls. It's a preference thing.
- Asker+1 y
Thanks, sorry if I misunderstood you.
- Illiaty Explorer+1 y
No, it doesn't really appeal to me.
1 0 0 0 - JamielovesKU Guru+1 y
Ew! No way!
1 0 0 0 - KBob93 Guru+1 y
My dog can lick her vagina.
1 0 0 0 - laseredandpierced Xper 6+1 y
not as long as I have girlfriends
2 1 0 0- mexicalisa+1 y
agreeee :)
- Tabra Xper 7+1 y
Probably not
1 0 0 0 - tiredofwaiting Guru+1 y
No thanks!
0 0 0 0 - SaltandVinegar Guru+1 y
Id pay to see that
1 4 0 0- angi3lilred+1 y
Impossible
- AmvAsk Xper 4+1 y
No I do not wish for such.
1 0 0 0 - butch56 Xper 3+1 y
i love to eat pussie all day night
0 0 0 0 - Anonymous+1 y
Honestly yes its weird to admite but girls get horny too ass you can see most girls that said yes clcked on the anonymous botton just like me what does that tell you that it is an embarrassing topic n weird to admite
1 0 0 0 - Anonymous+1 y
No never had that desire
1 0 0 0 - Anonymous+1 y
Yes I wish I could
2 0 0 0 - Show More (2)
Most Helpful Girls