Sexual Relationships 
Sexual Health 
Are these erotic photoshoots considered cheap and tacky or classy?
Female_assasin Xper 5
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
0 6
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!
What Girls & Guys Said
20 65I don't find anything cheap in these darling
Disgusting honestly, basically cheep Play Boy magazine shoots. Makes no difference how good you look , you have your shit hanging out in front of the world. I'd never take a girl that took pictures like that seriously. Every singly time you find a trail of sleaze throughout her life. Basically it shows immaturity and piss poor impulse control. She's going for the base stuff because she's too dumb to do much else.
A little tacky
Why?
I just think nude pics of any kind are. Nothing against them. Just how i feel
Top one erotic
Bottom one artistic
Wouldn't it be classed as Artistic Nude?
Because she is nude but 'covered'.
The second one is classy in my opinion and the first one is a little cheap
I find the 1st one to have that erotic element more , i could never call that cheap.
It does I'd have to agree, but do to the fact that porn made everything that is designed to be delicate and wholesome trash , don't forget people posting half ass pictures... it makes wonderful pieces (talking bout pictures not calling you a piece of ass) cheap 😣😧 Then again prolly partially my fault for all the porn from high school 😅
Why is that? what is wrong with porn? i mean , why do us human beings hate on anything that turns us on?
It just... has gotten so slizzy and cheap Tell you the truth I watch the homemade stuff when it comes to porn, tired of the industry. But you don't see me hating on you do you?
Lol nah i would never think of disolaying mysrlf like that to the public, artistically or not , but i actually like the cheap , sleazy , slutty thrills and i don't find anything wrong with them , i actually prefer movie sex scenes , they are the most sensual if they just showed private parts more often.
If my girlfriend sent me these I'd leave work find her and push her up against the wall while picking her up off her feet so she will wrap her legs around me... figure out the rest.
It’s nice
First one is a bit tacky and looks like anyone can take. The 2nd looks professional, but honestly 1st one is more of a turn on if that's what you're going for.
I voted A
Some nudes can be classy and artistic, but not these ones
Why not?
No artistic quality to them
These were supposed to be exclusively erotic and not only artistic.
Okay yeah I just consider these "eroric pics" Not erotic art
Well , then shoo shoo.
Who even talked about arts anyways? i was talking about photoshoots.
Photography is considered art to some Dont you consider these kinds of girls slutty?
How would u know they are slutty? there are virgins who do that.
Well, the behavior is sleezy/slutty
I have not seen any bad or disgusting behavior from them , i think people are allergic to allure in general , whenever they are turned on by something , they consider it "bad" , i think we are just scared of our sexual feelings.
And we blame the person who sexually lured us for having them.
Didn't you say before you don't like girls who post these kinds of pics on Instagram?
This is different than those cheap pics on instagram.
How so?
These are models who are paid and they have professional photographers, a director , and what not.
Oh, I see what you mean But I wouldn't know that just from looking at it So professional pics for art I don't consider sleazy I own pics like that myself So you're okay with Playboy girls?
I'm okay with anyone who isn't a threat to it's surroundings 😅 playboy photoshooting can be very erotic and classy as i have seen , especially the older versions
I LOVE the older Playboys And older nudes in general I forgot you were bi Lol
Yeah i'm lol , anyhow, i'm more into erotic nude not just any normal nude , i value sexual instinct since it's a part of us and in our nature.
I am to, to be honest
If these aren't girls taking them, themselves for their mates but models stripping for money than I think they are skanks and this is porn.
If my wife posed butt naked for this shit I'd divorce her.
Why would you even call these erotic photos? Just because she's not clothed doesn't mean it's erotic. I'd argue that these pictures are about as un-erotic as pictures of a naked woman can be.
As for the poll part, I don't consider either picture cheap or tacky. They're very polite. Not even showing naughty bits really.
So... That's my two cents.
Wait wait wait , so if they were showing "naughty" bits it would have been tacky and cheap? seriously?😒😒😒
I never said that.
depends. if you want those images for yourself, that's fine but if you hang that shit in your living room, that's tacky as fuck.
You’re lucky there are no nipples, pussy or butt showing or I’d report this. Cheap and tacky.
Shadaap
I hope that is not you.
I'm a muslim , a strict one in some aspects such as sexuality too, so do u think i'd ever do that?
Neither seems that erotic, but lean towards artistic. None are elegant and classy. Not sure of the correlation between erotic and elegant/classy. Both are good photos.
Nothing's showing. Tastefully done.
Cheap cause she should only look like this for her husband at home, other than that, it will be cheap and make the woman a hoe!
A woman must cover her body well especially her private parts cause her body belongs to her husband or future husband.
Very classy for me
Great photos :)
I shouldn't comment on one's own choice. However, I would not consider it cheap.
Love them