Are you a supporter of LGBTQ?

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

If the question had the meaning it did 10-15 years ago, yes. Now my answer is no. Wanting the same employment and governmental benefits straight people had gave way to demanding the inclusion of sexually explicit books in school libraries. Worse is the demand for the "right" to manipulate confused minors into permanently changing their bodies through surgery or medication. On both counts, activists use euphemisms like "book banning" and "gender-affirming care" as a bullying tactic to hide what is happening prevent real debate. I can't support any of this.

[Tyrael]

Supporter? No, I suppose not. I'm fine with people being gay. And they're now able to get married and do everything a straight couple can do, so there's really no support required.

As for the rest, I refuse to support the brainwashing of children, and the child abuse that is putting children on hormone blockers and operating on them when they can't reasonably consent.

Schools getting rid of books written by straight authors in favour of gay authors is another absurdity I can't abide. Use the best teaching materials available to teach kids, the authors sexuality has nothing to do with it.

[Quackthulu2]

Obviously. Because I am not a complete piece of shit.

[Anonymous]

^ This

[PositiveFlight]

What about equal rights for polygamists? LGBTQ can now legally be married. Those practicing polygamy are still discriminated against, criminalized, and treated like a second class disease within society! There should be no buts or exceptions otherwise one cannot proclaim that they support people having equal human rights and equality

[najekim]

@PositiveFlight Well, I've never seen a problem with multi-spouse arrangements and if it works, more power to ya!

[PositiveFlight]

@najekim The point I’m trying to make is that all I ever here about is calls and more calls and crying out for “equality” from LGBTQ folks and yet they get everything they ask for while being hateful and intolerant of those who don’t fit into their agenda. Marriage is now fully legal for them but they sure don’t believe in true equality when they are fine with the continued discrimination of others!

[PositiveFlight]

I support people’s liberty and freedom to do what they wish. But I in no way support or condone LGBTQ because I think it’s unnatural and contrary to the design of the human body. So they can do what they want, but don’t expect me to be out in celebration with them. They can now be legally married while polygamists still can’t because polygamy is still discriminated against! What more do LGBTQ people want?

[ZXCwWRQWz]

They went too far with what they're doing to kids nowadays. I used to be a defender of homosexuals against Westboro types, and I still don't think it's a big deal if an adult wants to be homo or bi or whatever. But especially those TQ+ activists are going way, way too far, and I think there needs to be a separation between the LGBs with the TQ+ because the TQ+ are going insane.

[ZXCwWRQWz]

No 10-year old should be identifying as non-binary or pansexual. That's child abuse every single time.

[OlderAndWiser]

Supporter? Like giving them money? Hell no!

[RobT312]

Supporter to the extent of equal rights and people being all kinds. I think it has served its mission accomplishing that, but some of the stuff going on now is overboard unfortunately.

[Sirenboobzilla]

Absolutely

[Siri137]

No, they already have more than enough support from others, so they don't need mine as well.

[CrimsonAngel09]

I'm bisexual, so yeah.

[summiter]

Of course... life is short... enjoy it

[mandyfire98]

Yes because I'm a member of the community.

[CAPTAIN-OBVIOUS]

You’re transgender?

[mandyfire98]

I'm bisexual

[Berethor]

I only support female bisexuals, I am not a supporter, as I consider trans to be mentally ill.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruby_Rose#Personal_life

[Agape93]

Yeap.

[Dargil]

I tolerate it, so long as it does not infringe on my or my family's rights or cost me money. If that happens, I will work aggressively against it. If you all don't want to be swatted by the majority culture, behave yourselves and things will be fine.

[oldguystillhasit]

I do not hate nor support LGBTQ. I also do not hate nor support heterosexual people either. Both categories should be left alone and not be hated by the other.

[FunkyMonkee]

Yes BUT, I DON'T like it being shoved down my throat and I DON'T like them FORCING IT onto little children!!!

[Lenanolena]

You don't have to shout

[FunkyMonkee]

@Lenanolena When did I shout? I'm typing! It's called, emphasis.

[Ms_Facesitter]

I think.

[Spade_01]

NEVER.

[Phoenix98]

Nope I could never support a group that gets rid of books by straight authors in favor of gay authors for no other reason in that the straight authors weren't gay a book should be judged on the content within it's pages not sexual orientation of the one who wrote it. It's beyond stupid and two steps away from a much bigger issue of a similar nature already plaguing the country.

I also will never support a group that forces transgenderism and just the whole thing in general on children, sexualizes kids, gives underaged minors lap dances in public schools in front of other kids and has kids in parades with tons of people dressed in BDSM outfits and gear among other things that kind of stuff is predatory and should not be happening.

If you (people) don't see an issue with those kinds of things happening then there is something seriously wrong with you.

[BlackJeep]

I wouldn't say supporter because I don't really care. Not my pig, not my farm

[runnerboy]

At least in many countries people have a right to be free and to choose who the identify as and who they choose to have sex with. Life is short and everyone has a right to be happy

[gothbxtch]

yes, of course!

[Sparkie460]

Yes I have friends that are gay, bisexual and lesbians. Their sexual preference doesn't matter to me. I'm proud to have them as friends

[dudeinohio]

I see no reason not to. be. they do no. harm to me

[Unknown29]

Absolutely not! I mean I feel bad for the people in the community, because transgender people suicidal rate is nearly 50 percent. They obviously aren’t to happy.

[CuriousMufuxka]

No group needed. Be yourself on your own preference!

[najekim]

For the LGB folks, I fully support since they are defining their sexual orientations.

I have no problem with the real and true "T" folks after they undergo their sex reassignment surgeries. Until then, they are transitioning and should not be called transgender or transsexual nor should they hold themselves as such.

As far as the rest of the alphabet, once they get it out of their heads that they aren't any more special than anyone else and decide which of the first three letters they wish to orientate themselves with or be a heterosexual person. None of the three choices they have are wrong , IMHO.

Now, when it comes to the non-sexual or asexual, I kinda feel sorry for them for choosing to not explore some of the greatest pleasure nature has given our species.

[Anonymous]

Not in the least.