Scenario 1: A woman is giving her boyfriend orgasms during vaginal sex, but she can't orgasm without receiving oral sex. He refuses to give her oral. She dumps him because she's tired of the frustration of not getting release of sexual tension (orgasm).
Scenario 2: A man gets sexual release from orgasming during vaginal intercourse, yet he dumps his girlfriend for denying him the additional bonus of anal sex because it's too painful.
In one of these situations, a person is dumping their partner because they're tired of being constantly frustrated by not getting sexual release; in another, a person is dumping their partner because their partner won't submit to a painful activity that is ultimately just a bonus that isn't vital for sexual release.
Do you believe these 2 scenarios are equivalent? Please read all options before voting.
Do you think these 2 scenarios are equivalent?
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Updates:
+1 y
Anyone saying the woman is selfish needs to imagine how they would feel if every time they had sex, they got "blue clit"/"blue balls" due to lack of orgasm. If every sexual encounter ended in sexual frustration, who would want to continue having sex? It's not selfish to want to orgasm If your partner is also having an orgasm
1 5
What Girls & Guys Said
7 49To me, both are equivalent. Anal and oral sex are deal-breakers for me.
Oh yes, since oral sex involves getting pee and menses in your mouth even if the woman cleans herself. I presume you won't be kissing your wife when she's pregnant & she's vomiting nearly every day?
That's right
Both cases are sexual mismatch.
I know female's that is as scenario 2. no anal not gonna work in the long run.
Depends on how much he wants anal lol
No. Oral sex won't cause someone to scream or possibly cry. Having your anus penetrated no matter how "slow" a guy says he will go still hurts and bothers the immense majority of women..
they're not completely equivalent but they're close. scenario one has it worse than the guy in scenario 2. even so, people will act in there own self interests
That is relative. For the guy in anal it may be the only way he can orgasm to sexual release. Not that i care because i don't like anal but some people get stuck doing something and can't orgasm without it. It is understandable the girl might not want it but then there are women who prefer it. As for the first the woman. not getting satisfied is obviously a bad thing because he is just using her for his own pleasure. Could you say the same about the second that she is just using him?
99.9% of men can orgasm without anal, but many women can't orgasm without oral
Is that a fact? 😗
I'd like to dispute that number
These aren't equivalent. Not having an orgasm vs having an orgasm and wanting an extra option are different.
It's hard answering this; your subjectiveness has quite manipulated the poll in such a way you're almost forced to say the scenarios aren't equivalent in favor of the first scenario, and that's quite easily noticeable in the to be chosen answers.
That aside, it doesn't really matter who is breaking up here, right? The two aren't even remotely sexually compatible, and thus shouldn't be having a relationship involving sex in the first place. Since we're talking about two people who find sexual compatibility important enough to break up over a lack of it, I think breaking up entirely is the correct choice, again, no matter who is the one breaking up.
Oral sex does not have the potential to cause physical damage like small sex does. The scenario #2 person is much more selfish and disrespectful.
... anal sex, not small sex. (typo error)
They are not equivalent, but they are valid reasons to break up
Not equal at all, she is dumping him because he does not satisfy her sexual at all, he on the other hand is dumping her because of a optional sex that is not necessary... in both cases he is selfish
They both make the guy look like the asshole so if it's a loaded question I'm not gonna bite
I don't care. I'll be the idiot since both oral sex and anal sex are disgusting, unnecessary, and deal-breakers for me.
@Dchrls78104 cunnilingus is necessary for many women to orgasm so yes it's often necessary if you're going to follow the biblical command to satisfy your wife. Leaving your wife with blue-clit because she isn't orgasming during sex ISN'T satisfying her as commanded by 1 Cor 7.
@mistixs in your opinion...
@Dchrls78104 in my opinion? If you weren't having orgasms, so you suffered blue balls every time you had sex, would you be satisfied?
@mistixs your personal preferences have nothing to do with Scriptural teachings. Assuming that they do is an error. God did not create the mouth for entry into the vagina.
@Dchrls78104 I am a virgin so I don't know what my preferences are. I draw my conclusions from research that shows that oral is the most effective way to make a woman orgasm.
@mistixs and I from human biology. I, too, am a virgin. The mouth was not created to be inserted into the vagina so a man is under no obligation to place his mouth there.
@Dchrls78104 I am not saying he's obligated. I'm saying that he's not fulfilling the commandment to satisfy his wife, if he's leaving her with no orgasms.
@Dchrls78104 and God didn't create the hand to grope boobs, nor the lips to kiss, but here we are "7Your stature is like a palm tree; your breasts are clusters of fruit. 8I said, “I will climb the palm tree; I will take hold of its fruit.” May your breasts be like clusters of the vine, the fragrance of your breath like apples, b9and your mouth like the finest wine." (Song of Solomon 7)
@mistixs then you are saying the man is obligated to perform oral sex, which is an error. If oral sex were indeed necessary the mouth would have designed specifically for insertion into the vagina or in females the entry of the penis. Stimulation of the clitoris or penis might be necessary, but oral sex is not.
Are we arefuing about what the bibbl has to say about oral sex? Because if there is one way to male eating pussy and sucking dick boring unappealing and just totaly not sexy its argue about it from a logistical religious point of view.
Situation 2 is absolutely selfish, Situation 1 is completely in her right to leave. Being pent-up and denied release for extended periods of time can be hazardous to your health.
He's an idiot for not partaking in the most beautiful and tasty part of sex , hrs of licking and eating pussy mmmmmm
My favorite sexual release my orgasm not needed.
Slate69 knows where it’s at!
Only the person in Scenario #1 is selfish. The person in Scenario #2 is not selfish.
And if you don't want to use your mouth? for hygiene reasons, with your fingers
This question was too confusing.
My opinion is lack of effective communication between these two people.
Anal sex isn't a must but a woman's orgasm Is essential to her too.
Women have different g-spots (of which anal sex is One for them by the way; according to what i have read written by most women), around 1-5% of women have vaginal orgasm meaning a man has to Explore a woman's body to understand what gives her the ultimate pleasure. This can only be achieved through effective communication.
Be yourself and you will find your partner
My Philosophy is if you're not happy and satisfied then don't stay