I have bedded both rich and poor whores. Social class has nothing to do with whoring.
0010
Gwenhwyfar
+1 y
Did you pay for them? And doesn’t that make you a whore too? Or at least a John?
KrakenAttackin
+1 y
Didn't pay... at least not in terms of money. Am I whore? Relative to the women who post on GAG I am a rank amateur.
Gwenhwyfar
+1 y
I’m sorry. I’m gonna block you.
asshole_Yoda
+1 y
Yeah, it probably does
1000
korey182Xper 6
+1 y
i'm. not.. sure..
1000
korey182
+1 y
there's too many big words
Gwenhwyfar
+1 y
😊😊😊
888theGreatMaster
+1 y
It should be one man and one woman married for life. If you are married and both agree , anything goes. I think it is immoral for married couples and other couples to have sex, and 2 females one male or one female and 2 males , or multiple males and multiple females fooling around. That is a one way ticket to hell. Another reason I think end is near because I believe 75% of population is doing this stuff. It is also why STD's are so bad here and why the virus 19 is here to stay. US mirrors Rome , they were having sex with everyone and kids just before Rome fell apart. This will happen to US too.
1000
Guardian45Guru
+1 y
Nope! I've evolved beyond that from my own experiences.
1000
TstrbrainerGuru
+1 y
No, I don't think so. Sexual interests are more of a personal choice and is quite independent of financial resources. Well, they can afford to have expensive sex, but that doesn't mean poor people don't have such fantasies. So the views on morality and fidelity may not be affected by social class
1000
Gwenhwyfar
+1 y
Thanks
mrgspoterYoda
+1 y
Anything can people can get stuck in one train of thought and find it hard to get out.
1000
MrTabooYoda
+1 y
No. It's even across the board
1000
Cryptic-GameGuru
+1 y
It doesn't affect it.
1000
floorislava85Xper 5
+1 y
I'm not so sure it does
1000
Gwenhwyfar
+1 y
Interesting
floorislava85
+1 y
Yes you are
floorislava85
+1 y
Pretty flowers
Show All Show Less
Gwenhwyfar
+1 y
Thanks 😊. From my garden.
gandolph3Yoda
+1 y
it certainly tries to
1000
Zach1457Xper 7
+1 y
What do you mean by social class?
1000
Gwenhwyfar
+1 y
Rich, middle class etc. Also there are different subclasses
Zach1457
+1 y
Okay.. It doesn't affect actually. We all know that the same whell turns in there too. Imagine a rich man having a sex-party with 10+ whores 😅 Also apart from your question;i would ask this ; "Do rich and wealthy people have better quality sex than poor people's? " Yes.. two times yes. There's a huge gap. I pity to them. While rich people are relaxing at their wide, comfort space, the others tryna find a good place to get together. What do you think about this?
Gwenhwyfar
+1 y
True, but making out in a coat closet can be fun too 😊
Show All Show Less
Zach1457
+1 y
Even though it is.. i still prefer that big, cozy bed
Gwenhwyfar
+1 y
Good point
Smf1989Guru
+1 y
No it doesn't
1000
Anonymous
+1 y
no...
1000
Anonymous
+1 y
It seems it does from what I saw in the society. Interesting question
0000
Opinion Owner
+1 y
or maybe not, because one has more options and the other hasn't. If they both had same options or chances, both would behave the same. I don't know, this is very confusing, more like it depends on the person. So, I am out, I don't have proper opinion
Gwenhwyfar
+1 y
Thank you 😊
Opinion Owner
+1 y
*doesn't T, can we use hasn't in there as well? To answer your question: it does affect, even in here I am talking about same opportunities. It means it depends on it. And I have seen rich people being more promiscuous.
Show All Show Less
Gwenhwyfar
+1 y
Hasn’t is fine 😊
Opinion Owner
+1 y
Thanks :) Just having something good from this site lol
What Girls & Guys Said
7 34I do not have a social class.
I don't even know whay my social class is, lol
I have bedded both rich and poor whores. Social class has nothing to do with whoring.
Did you pay for them? And doesn’t that make you a whore too? Or at least a John?
Didn't pay... at least not in terms of money. Am I whore? Relative to the women who post on GAG I am a rank amateur.
I’m sorry. I’m gonna block you.
Yeah, it probably does
i'm. not.. sure..
there's too many big words
😊😊😊
It should be one man and one woman married for life. If you are married and both agree , anything goes. I think it is immoral for married couples and other couples to have sex, and 2 females one male or one female and 2 males , or multiple males and multiple females fooling around. That is a one way ticket to hell. Another reason I think end is near because I believe 75% of population is doing this stuff. It is also why STD's are so bad here and why the virus 19 is here to stay. US mirrors Rome , they were having sex with everyone and kids just before Rome fell apart. This will happen to US too.
Nope! I've evolved beyond that from my own experiences.
No, I don't think so.
Sexual interests are more of a personal choice and is quite independent of financial resources. Well, they can afford to have expensive sex, but that doesn't mean poor people don't have such fantasies. So the views on morality and fidelity may not be affected by social class
Thanks
Anything can people can get stuck in one train of thought and find it hard to get out.
No. It's even across the board
It doesn't affect it.
I'm not so sure it does
Interesting
Yes you are
Pretty flowers
Thanks 😊. From my garden.
it certainly tries to
What do you mean by social class?
Rich, middle class etc. Also there are different subclasses
Okay.. It doesn't affect actually. We all know that the same whell turns in there too. Imagine a rich man having a sex-party with 10+ whores 😅 Also apart from your question;i would ask this ; "Do rich and wealthy people have better quality sex than poor people's? " Yes.. two times yes. There's a huge gap. I pity to them. While rich people are relaxing at their wide, comfort space, the others tryna find a good place to get together. What do you think about this?
True, but making out in a coat closet can be fun too 😊
Even though it is.. i still prefer that big, cozy bed
Good point
No it doesn't
no...
It seems it does from what I saw in the society. Interesting question
or maybe not, because one has more options and the other hasn't. If they both had same options or chances, both would behave the same. I don't know, this is very confusing, more like it depends on the person. So, I am out, I don't have proper opinion
Thank you 😊
*doesn't T, can we use hasn't in there as well? To answer your question: it does affect, even in here I am talking about same opportunities. It means it depends on it. And I have seen rich people being more promiscuous.
Hasn’t is fine 😊
Thanks :) Just having something good from this site lol
Cool 😊