How do you feel about all of these "should I bang my step sister/brother questions lately? Is incest OK under this "no blood relation" technicality?

Yeah...I KNOW..."they're not blood related, so it's not incest".

But is that really true?

How do you feel about all of these "should I bang my step sister/brother questions lately? Is incest OK under this "no blood relation" technicality?

I understand the biological justification loop hole...

I've seen a lot of these questions lately, and it seems like many of the opinions given are somewhere between "go for it, it's not like you're blood related" to "well it could be complicated, but at least you're not related".

I don't judge people for what they choose to do...

But I just think that people need to understand what they're actually asking, as well as what advice they're getting/giving.

As a person that has full, half, and step siblings... they are ALL FAMILY MEMBERS to me. I'm close to them. I love them. I trust them.

So as an example... when a girl is 18 and her step brother is 32... how does the fact that "they're not blood related" make it "ok" for them to do whatever? But if for instance, they had the same dad, even though they were not raised together because he had two completely different families with two different wives... instead of "OK" now all of a sudden it's off the charts 'wrong, sick, gross, etc.".

How do you feel about all of these "should I bang my step sister/brother questions lately? Is incest OK under this "no blood relation" technicality?

You can say she's "not related to be" if that makes you feel better... but in reality... she's YOUR SISTER by living arrangement (see image above), as your parents raised you as siblings. Think about it...

Again, I'm NOT judging...

Personally, I believe that people simply don't think these things through before they ask these questions or offer advice on them.
Updates:
+1 y
For those of you too lazy to read, there is the LEGAL definition (in most US states) of "incest" - then there is the PRACTICAL (real life) definition of "incest". I already made clear that I know about the "no blood relation, no incest" LOOPHOLE. FFS... SMH...
+1 y
INCEST: People PLEASE... FFS... Stop getting hung up on the single word "incest" and it's legal definition. That's not the point. I even tried to illustrate it with an image. I intentionally used the word "INCEST" for the very reason that some of you keep answering "it's not incest if they're not blood related". YEAH, WE KNOW THAT, OK? But in a PRACTICAL SENSE... step siblings that are raised together as FAMILY... ARE FAMILY. So in a PRACTICAL (not legal) sense, they're brother and sister.
2 4

Most Helpful Guys

  • Family units are complicated, and a pain, but they are also where you learn about trust and non romantic love. No matter if you are blood or not, this is a unit where trust and safety exist, or should anyway.

    Studies have shown that non related children of opposite sex raised together as a family unit ( including communes) rarely share a sexual attraction towards each other. It is protection that evolved over time and you have to wonder why, and it to protect the family genetically and functionally.

    Also Don't shit where you eat. Not at work, not at home. Sex complicates things way more than they need to be. And in a family unit, this is destructive.

    Sex between the child and the adult figure is damaging and violates the power trust/balance within a family.

    Sex between genetically unrelated siblings is also a violation of trust that the adults have with the kids, and the trust that is shared between these siblings.. There are no credible physiological studies that have found these "non related Incest" relationships as healthy.. it comes down to "Don't shit where you eat"

    Blood related or not, Children and adults that grow as a family can only be harmed by Incest.. Don't fuck you sister\brother, as there are no "steps or halves" in a family..

  • Haven't seen these questions, but I feel like it's something that should be discussed as divorce and remarry is geting more common by each year it seems, and since the world becomes more and more "sexually liberated" each year aswell. As for my feelings on the matter. It's mixed. I'm a firm believer in autonomy (as in the freedom to choose rules an principles for oneself, not the freedom to do whatever you want), so I would probably say that most things are okey as long as they don't conflict with the individual values, and affects outside individual autonomy. However, its impossible for me with the knowledge i currently lack to comment on what kind of problems this will turn into. The only experience I have on the matter is one where my dad dated the mother, and my littlebrother dated the daughter. It got awkward when my dad and the mother stopped dating, and my brother and the daughter stopped dating too after just a few weeks because of the problems/awkwardness between my dad and the mother

    • thanks

Most Helpful Girls

  • I 100% agree with you. My parents and I were just talking about this because my mom has a big family and some of them are not blood related but that doesn't give it a " okay" to date or whatever. I still see it as being wrong.
    This actually happened though ( that's why I mentioned my mom ) her cousin ( not blood related ) kissed her older sister ( also not blood related ) on the lips and then tried to lay in bed with her. My mom yelled at him and told her parents on him. They even kicked him out because it is wrong to do something like that.

  • I need to be honest. I have no idea what you're talking about, but if it's family related I'd say that it isn't okay. Our purpose is to reproduce with others, not to have sexual pleasures with your family members. I take intercourse personally and hate it whenever people take it lightly. To me and maybe some certain people it's quite a sacred bonding tradition only to reproduce.

  • If the non-related kids get married FIRST, does that prevent the single mum parent of one kid marrying the single dad of the other kid?

    Bearing in mind, the two single parents MAY have met because of the kids meeting first.

    • Also ther is a HUGE difference between step-sibling and half-sibling!

    • Is there? That's why I posted this question. Biologically, sure. But practically, not necessarily.

    • Show All
  • Like you said if the person is not a blood relative it isn't legally incest and the many reasons for not allowing incest cannot happen unless they are blood relatives so let the step kids fuck their brains out.

    • OK. That wasn't my point, but I respect your opinion.

    • Thank you as your remark was very thoughful! Another point to bring up is the reason for incest law at all and that is the possible medical problems coming to offspring of blood relatives making kids. If it were not for that reason even the law wouldn't care who was having sex with whol I do see your point with this question however and I personally know that I could never see me getting involved with a blood or step relative.

Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions

What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!

What Girls & Guys Said

18 21
  • Same sorts probably pee in bed so lazy they are

    • LOL, well there's one way to look at it.

  • I think the closer you are related the more you should steer towards oral

    • Hilarious

    • It's funny but you know it's true

  • I was raised a pretty conservative christian. By Israelite law that is incest.

  • Yes it's ok

    • Would you fuck your siblings?

    • @Hotscorpio3 already fucked my brother

    • Add me

    • Show All
  • Yeah if you are mature and responsible enough for such relationship, besides medical reasons why not

    How do you feel about all of these "should I bang my step sister/brother questions lately? Is incest OK under this "no blood relation" technicality?