Sexual Relationships 
Sexual Health 
Is it OK for a girl to romantically kiss another girl?
laurieluvsit Master
A. OMG! NO! That is disgusting!
Vote A
B. It's OK if they want to do it, but I will stick with heterosexual activities, thank you
Vote B
C. Yes! ... there is nothing wrong with it!
Vote C
D. Sure, girls are inclined to kiss other girls anyway, it has always been that way
Vote D
E. I can't get enough of doing it or seeing it!
Vote E
F. OTHER, see my comments below, or just open the "Girls Kiss Girls" survey
Vote F
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
7 7
What Girls & Guys Said
51 86No it's definitely not ok despite what Rosie O'Donnell and Ellen Degenerate tell you.
Thank you majestic I on your side with this one
Oof found the homophobe. Or rather, the girl in the closet.
@DevikaButts95 hey she's just stating her opinion sjw
@DevikaButts95 Right because disagreeing with someone elses choices = hate, right? homophobia is a great word to use when you want to shut down anyone who thinks differently than you. Next hit me with racist, Islamaphobe, anti semite, anything else you can do to ignore that not everyone believes what you do.
@The_man_whol_aughs Yea, a negative, hateful opinion. I'm just stating a fact with an opinionated hypothesis after the fact.
When it is specifically opposing someone in such a case as this, yes, it is hate. Homophobia is an accurate word to use when someone specifically opposes people being homosexual i. e. being a hateful bigot. It also shuts you down too, for your homophobic opinion, yes. I don't how you think mentioning that let's you escape that. But it was funny. Lmao. I'll just hit ya with what you've shown, since homophobe is an accurate word and the rest might not be. Although I'm guessing to get triggered that bad you've been called those words before, which gives me a sneaking suspicion some of those might also be true.
@DevikaButts95 I'm pretty sure your going call someone hateful if they oppose a 10 year old girl from dating a 30 year old man
@The_man_whol_aughs No? How is that an actual argument you used? You can't be a consenting adult if you're not an adult. That's rape, both legally and morally speaking.
@DevikaButts95 you need to know that homosexuality and pedophilia are mental disorders The only difference is what they are attracted to If one is accepted the other will have the courage follow their desire We are dealing with a double edged sword here and it's better to never pick it up
@The_man_whol_aughs No. You can't reasonably say homosexuality is a mental disorder, because there's nothing wrong with someone's brain for being homosexual. You're also a homophobe I see. But that's technically a fact, so giving that to you, say homosexuality is a mental disorder... doesn't matter. It doesn't cause any moral mishaps. If two adult women consent to sex, nothing morally bad happens. And that's one a fact. Also, don't know what the fallacy it's called, but just because A happens, doesn't mean B happens. That's also fact, not an opinion. That's just not how that works. Plus, thinking about this logically, there is a legal and more importantly major moral difference with pedophilia, which discourages that in the first place. And no, it's not a double edged sword. Again, A doesn't lead to B, you just want it to, because it justifies your hateful opinion. FACTUALLY you are wrong on all of this so far, meaning your opinion is literally objectively stupid. Not subjectively, objectively. Might be too big a word for ya, so you can google it if you want. I'm going to be direct with you. I don't mean to cause ad hominem here, it's not necessary, but for your own argument's sake, maybe just shut up, because you're an idiot. At least Majestic's response wasn't braindead. It's an opinion. But you are literally stupid, and don't know what you're talking about. Which makes your whole side look stupid, and like they don't know what they're talking about. That's just advice, feel free to ignore it, for argument's sake, really you're just bringing down Majestic too, and I'm fine with that. Lmao.
@DevikaButts95 Incorrect. All research for the last decade has shown that there is no genetic reason for homosexuality, it is in fact environmental impacts that lead to mental defects. Yes, it does cause moral issues. You're just too narrow minded to see it.
@MajesticTwelve 1. Link it, otherwise, or it's thrown and wrong. Lmao. 2. Name the moral problems, or that's thrown out and it's wrong. Don't let that dumb guy bring you down.
Also, sorry didn't include it last time: Even if it's caused by environment, that doesn't mean it's a mental disorder factually, either. Disorder could reasonably imply it has to be genetic actually, but regardless, it's pretty much just subjective, so reasonably, if it's genetic or not, it's still arguably not a disorder. But also withstanding, it being a choice or it being genetic, which I would argue it's a mixture of both, doesn't matter... given the lack of moral dilemmas in the first place.
@DevikaButts95 www.scientificamerican.com/.../
concernedwomen.org/images/content/bornorbred.pdf
www.hollanddavis.com/.../
katehon.com/.../not-born-way-homosexuality-not-genetic
@DevikaButts95 there's links. Maybe try doing your own research. This libshit "Do everything for me and provide me with evidence so I can then ignore it and claim you're just a homophobe anyways" attitude is garbage and shows me your dumb ass has values and beliefs that they've never even bothered to try and verify are accurate and true. Absolutely pathetic. People like you are everything wrong with society today.
@DevikaButts95 aren't you sexist A woman who is on my side is now a poor brainwashed woman that I'm bringing down just because I'm a man who was actually siding and agreeing with her From your response you sounded too emotional and not factual like majestic You like to try and try to make all your emotional rage arguments into facts You just want to show that just because it doesn't hurt anyone Your too blinded by this "love is love " bullshit that you can't see the bigger picture Facts are facts , they may racist , sexist or unfair but it won't change Sorry to say violence is more natural than homosexuality It may be bad but it's nature , you can't change it And dear , life is unpredictable you can't say just because a happens b doesn't happen Your so blinded by the media sexualisation and glorification of gay people that you don't see that it's encouraging creeps act their desires. by the way majestic made her opinion and arguments out of her own free will Just because she has a normal , logical and functional brain doesn't mean I'm "bringing her down " pathetic arguments
@MajesicTwelve I'm actually going to literally do that thing you said, mostly because it's 4 am, mostly because it's still irrelevant anyways. Doesn't matter if it's a genetic or a choice, as I already argued. You dodged that part, as well as offering what is morally wrong with it. I'll literally give in and say homosexuality is 100% a choice because I'm not feeling arguing it (even though the first link you provide in the line underneath the title suggests that it does have a limited contribution.), so what? How does that make it wrong if it's a choice? Doesn't, doesn't work that way. What I'm saying is, yes your links are irrelevant in this argument. But kudos for providing links in the first place, I'm actually impressed.
Here's my links though, to counter your's you provided:
www.sciencedirect.com/.../B9780128002223000085
link.springer.com/.../10.1007%2Fs10508-008-9381-6
@DevikaButts95 asks for links Majestic- provides it Also Devika- this irrelevant Wow I really didn't know that your that much in denial how pathetic
@DevikaButts95 You try to prove me wrong by... linking me studies that show I'm right and you're wrong? Nice job. I'm guessing you didn't bother to actually read what you linked, just made assumptions based on a few things and said "Aha! Got her now!" Only, no, you didn't. Whoops ;)
Good job majestic standing your ground
@The_man_whol_aughs I'm not gunna lie, I don't even know what you're on. I'm trying to figure out how you've gotten to the "you're sexist" You're not stupid because you're a guy, you're stupid because you've used fallacies and factually wrong statements to argue. Literally a waste. "Facts are facts , they may racist , sexist or unfair but it won't change" I guess that's an accurate statement unfortunately, you need to say some facts though in the first place. You haven't. "Sorry to say violence is more natural than homosexuality" In court, you'd get "Objection: Relevance". Because that's not relevant. At all. I'm concerned. Also, homosexuality, factually, is natural. Another fun fact. "And dear , life is unpredictable you can't say just because a happens b doesn't happen" Believe it or not, I didn't state that. AT ANY POINT. EVEN MORE SO, you stating that disagrees with your statement earlier. It is the same goddamn fallacy I was referencing earlier, for fucks sake dude. That one was sad. It was funny earlier, that was sad. That was depressingly sad. "Your so blinded by the media sexualisation and glorification of gay people that you don't see that it's encouraging creeps act their desires." You know what, link your shit. You don't have links for your bullshit, you're just spilling that. I don't care for your assumptions right now dude. Come at me with something substantial, can't, shut up. "Just because she has a normal , logical and functional brain doesn't mean I'm "bringing her down " pathetic arguments" To anyone independent (and maybe part of your own side) looking in on your argument, they are going to look in on you, and think you're stupid, then they are going to assume your whole side is stupid. Is it wrong to assume like that? Yes. That's just what's gunna happen in short though. Every time they read your comments they're gunna think "people against homosexuality are this stupid."
@MajesticTwelve You're right. I didn't read 'em, and I should have. I still haven't, I'm not going to, because I don't care, it's not relevant. But also, and I quote: "I'll literally give in and say homosexuality is 100% a choice" So... As of right now, since you haven't argued me on the main point... what is morally wrong about it? ... You clearly don't have an argument for it, thereby, it stands, there is nothing morally wrong about it.
Actually reading my first link, it does not agree with you... what? "We conclude by describing a hypothetical framework that unifies genetic and epigenetic explanations of sexual orientation and the continued challenges facing sexual orientation research." Like it's 5 am, I'm tired, so I will genuinely state that I might be reading that wrong... but I'm pretty certain it's saying genetic AND epignetic (i. e. environmental in short) explanations.
@DevikaButts95 what can I do if the people who look into what I said and think it's stupid , they are probably some love sickened puppies who won't venture into the dark side And when I mean violence is more natural , I mean it's development is more natural and logical considering that they are people who force them initiate such acts Plus take long good read at your comments your will notice that you stated that " just because a happens , doesn't mean b will happen " by the way it can and sometimes will Anything that you think is not going to happen but is humanly possible can happen and sometimes will happen My phone is actually full to save any links so I couldn't save it But why bother you will just deny it like you did to majestic Look I'm not saying homosexuals should be killed or anything They also have a life and can't help what happened But they need clinical treatment besides mentally ill people don't know their mentally ill Which is the case with you
You just proves my entire point , your Indian right , I heard they only recently legalised gay love ( very poor decision ) maybe that's why your so defensive
@The_man_whol_aughs Oof found the racist. Born and raised in the U. S. You choose to be an idiot, our "argument" is done. "just because a happens , doesn't mean b will happen" Yes, I'm aware I said that. Just because a happens, doesn't mean b happens. You said "just because a happens doesn't mean b doesn't happen" I am aware of what has been said. That is the same fallacy dude. It is A does not equal B in short. Doesn't matter if B is something happening or B is something specifically not happening. This is why our "argument" is done. I will ignore you from now on, it is a waste of my time. YOu're just a dumb echo chamber. Majestic has to argue the moral wrongs of this, which I'm waiting on. An argument that will not come, because she's been continually trying to dodge it, which is at least intelligent, just stupid to someone who knows what's going on.
@The_man_whol_aughs Also, saving links... that's not how phones work. Copy and paste it my dude. You don't have links. Lmao.
@DevikaButts95 how the hell can a wall text or even be in gag? Your the one who dodges facts you literally assumed and said that the links majestic provided are irrelevant when you didn't even read it Delusional to the end I see alright live in your bubble of fantasy
@The_man_whol_aughs No, I'm saying they're irrelevant because it's not the point of the conversation. I don't care if homosexuality is a choice or not. She can be right on that. She's not, but in terms of this argument I will downright let her win on that argument. Because the main argument here is "Is it wrong?" And it being a choice doesn't mean that choice is wrong, that's not how it logically works,
@DevikaButts95 OH MY FUCKING GOD You literally asked her for links saying "provide links or its wrong " and now your saying it's not the point of the argument You just don't like being wrong do you I feel sorry for your future boyfriend or even your future girlfriend Cuz your deadass delusional arrogant , self centred , ms perfect , "always right heroine " I'm done really even the other people who disagree with me are more logical than you Bye
@The_man_whol_aughs Prior to her providng links: "1. Link it, otherwise, or it's thrown and wrong. Lmao. 2. Name the moral problems, or that's thrown out and it's wrong. Don't let that dumb guy bring you down." -Me "Even if it's caused by environment, that doesn't mean it's a mental disorder factually, either. Disorder could reasonably imply it has to be genetic actually, but regardless, it's pretty much just subjective, so reasonably, if it's genetic or not, it's still arguably not a disorder. But also withstanding, it being a choice or it being genetic, which I would argue it's a mixture of both, doesn't matter... given the lack of moral dilemmas in the first place." - Me Both comment. You forfeit, good night.
@The_man_whol_aughs Also said I will run with the assumption multiple times that I'm wrong and it's a choice. You're just refusing to accept that, because focusing on that argument prevents you from having to answer the question you can't , as neither you nor Majestic can do. It's also the original argument. Again, you forfeit. I give Majestic 24 hours because I assume she reasonably went to bed, but otherwise, she forfeits. And the conclusion from this will be that it's not morally wrong to be homosexual, i. e. it's okay to be homosexual.
One last correction, sorry I'm tired. The original argument is "it's not okay to be homosexual" i. e. "it's morally wrong to be homosexual."
@DevikaButts95 are you agreeing that's it's wrong to be a homosexual In that case you finally grew a small brain cell
@The_man_whol_aughs No, that's factually wrong.
@DevikaButts95 ah shit here we again I think I have seen you somewhere about liking ride a white guys face? Stick to it that's all you good for but hey you can actually educate yourself and grow brain cells again
@The_man_whol_aughs As a reiteration: You have failed to argue it and thus have forfeited and admitted I'm right. Good night. :)
@DevikaButts95 what the fuck Fine let's agree to disagree If it helps you sleep at night
@The_man_whol_aughs No you have failed to argue the point. The conclusion is that it is not morally wrong, sorry.
@DevikaButts95 again whatever helps you sleep at night Denial is a bliss
@The_man_whol_aughs Yea, you sound blissful.
@The_man_whol_aughs Ignorance is bliss after all, and you're extremely ignorant. Lmao.
@DevikaButts95 and your stupidity even more so Goodbye no point arguing to a brain dead wall
@The_man_whol_aughs You never argued the point. It's why you lost.
@DevikaButts95 the only think is time arguing with a delusional being such as yourself And the fact that your so eager to show that you won ( even tho you didn't ) shows how desperate you are Now oof off
@The_man_whol_aughs I did win. You did not argue. Still haven't.
@DevikaButts95 I did more than I could But you can only argue with a wall for so long
@The_man_whol_aughs Okay, so besides your fallacy argument (proven wrong on the fact that it is a fallacy), quote what you argued that it is morally wrong
@DevikaButts95 just jump off a bridge and die you will do the world kindness Deep down I know you know you really lost and just making up excuses to compensate your failure
Hilarious given many of your nasty, slutty responses, that you sit there and call people degenerates. Hello, your nastiness is by definition degenerate by any and all conventional moral standards. Are you that clueless, or just that brazen?
@The_man_whol_aughs Ayy something to report. Lmao. Death threats because you're not smart enough to argue, a classic.
Ayyyyy I got the fallacies. Majestic uses a Strawman, continually arguing that being gay is a choice... despite that not at all playing to the main argument at hand. And The Man Whose Dumb uses a Slippery Slope, taking assumption that doing a leads to b, as I already said.
@DevikaButts95 You could attach phobe to literally anything, but if it's the wrong things it doesn't matter what you attach it to.
@ThisAndThat Yes, and being a homophobe is bad. Lmao.
@DevikaButts95 Someone maintaining their good morals and standards is bad to you? That's basically what your saying.
@ThisAndThat They're actually not good morals. Being a homophobe specifically means you hate people, that's what the phobe part of the word means. I'm gunna guess you're religious, to which I'd say, being hateful is not a good moral no matter how you try to spin it. And if you're not religious, being hateful people just 'cause is not a good moral in general either. And then, you're also hating on people who you have no real reason to, since nothing a gay person does anything bad to you.
@DevikaButts95 Hey hold up there. You inserted the word hate. Who said anything about hate? You are injecting and interchanging hate where there is disapproval. And yes, I am a Christian, and no religious people not the only one that disapproves of things like homosexuality. Most atheist will tell you the same thing. And that's because homosexuality has no purpose or homosexuals could have normal lives IE produce children whereas they can't. In other words homosexuality isn't normal rather you like it or not.
@ThisAndThat Oh the dumbass alarm is sounding. Phobia means an extreme hate of something. I. e. being a homophobe means you HATE homosexuals. This is a fact and not up for debate. You're just trying to rationalize your hate by pretending it disapproval. It's more than just that. "Most atheist will tell you the same thing." This is laughable. Just outright, I'm not sure what fallacy it is, but that falls in line with the classic phrase" 79% of statistics are made up on the spot." No, most atheists won't, because being gay isn't immoral. You can't reasonably argue that once you remove religion. It's specifically Christians, and other such religions, like Muslims. You can't even reasonably argue it with religion either. And my favorite incorrect statement, the one I've been waiting for, homosexuality serves a purpose! It brings people seratonin, dopamine, whatever. It gives you pleasure, happiness is actually a thing you need in life! Just because you can't reproduce from it, doesn't mean it doesn't serve a purpose, just means reproduction isn't it's purpose. Congrats! by the way, another fact. Also homsexuality is normal. This one is at least an opinion, but I mean, with so many homosexuals out there, it is now normalized. Plus, humans aren't the only homosexuals, homsexual behavior has been found in literally hundreds of other animal species. HUNDREDS. Another fact. But of course, you're a boomer so, this is all lost on your ears. Lmao.
@DevikaButts95 Oh sure, disapproval of it can't be justified in religion either, right? 1 Corinthians 6:9 Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit or have any share in the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate [by perversion], nor those who participate in homosexuality,
@ThisAndThat Not really. From a logical standpoint, why would God care if people are gay? I feel like a higher being has other things to worry about, considering that doesn't negatively effect anyone, and God would realize that. But the other point is that it's God's job to disapprove of that anyways. You're not god buddy, you're not supposed to be passing judgement. Lmao.
@DevikaButts95 There's a huge difference between passing judgement and warning of judgement to be, you clearly haven't figured that one out. And if you think homosexuality doesn't mean that much to God, maybe you've missed the part where God said it's detestable thing, an abomination to God. That means he hates it and he will curse you for it, not to mention you won't enter the Kingdom of God. You can go argue with God about it if you want, but I doubt seriously you're going to win.
@ThisAndThat I mean I don't believe your shitty religion. If God is absolutely against homosexuality, something that is not immoral, factually speaking, then clearly he is malevolent, and is not worth worshiping in the first place. Of course as I said, if God exists, he's a higher up being and is going to understand that there's nothing wrong with it. I see what your dumb book says, but like, the books not God. Maybe it was perhaps God's word at some point but.. he's a higher being than us, his ideals will change just like us. Either or, I can easily say without a doubt you'll be going to hell independently. Disapproving of someone is passing judgement, not warning of judgement to come. And that's not taking into account that you're actually just pretending it's disapproval when it's really just flat out hate. Ever consider God maybe put homosexuals to test your meddle on whether you're a good person or not? Because if we exist, God is in part responsible for it, no? You're failing though, and I take satisfaction in the fact knowing you'll burn in hell.
@DevikaButts95 You're a typical leftist I can tell. You may be good at manipulating men but I can tell you now, God's word is his word and yes he exist or he couldn't have possibly gave us the Prophecy of Isaiah. Are you familiar with Isaiah IE Isaiah 4:1 and Isaiah 13:12 especially? Allow me to assist you. Isaiah 4:1 is basically MGTOW without the acronym and it goes like this. Isaiah 4:1 When this happens, seven women will grab the same man, and each of them will say, “I’ll buy my own food and clothes! Just marry me and take away my disgrace.” Now are you ready for Isaiah 13:12? Isaiah 13:12 An Oracle Concerning Babylon … I will punish the world for its evil and the wicked for their iniquity. I will end the haughtiness of the arrogant and lay low the pride of the ruthless. I will make man scarcer than pure gold, and mankind rarer than the gold of Ophir. Therefore I will make the heavens tremble, and the earth will be shaken from its place at the wrath of the LORD of Hosts on the day of His burning anger.… Isaiah is starting to sound familiar isn't it? You can sit and assume things of God all you want. He left his word IE the Bible for a reason.
@ThisAndThat I'm not a leftist. Anyhow, you didn't refute anything I said. All I can say is enjoy burning in hell buddy, you're going there. No doubt about that. You're not God, so stop trying to be him, mmmkay?
@DevikaButts95 Your deflecting works well among this society that will believe your deceit. But if you think for one second your attempts will work on God himself, you go right ahead, let's see how that works out for you.
@ThisAndThat It's not deflecting, it's just logic. God is either a good being, and this non-immoral act wouldn't bother him, or he's a bad being and not worth worshiping. But also, your religion is pretty stupid, and no one cares for it. And if it does exist, you're just gunna be burning in hell for how you behave.
I think it's a mess. Nothing to add
No, it’s the year 1920, we don’t ever even talk about this shit.
Not wrong, but exercise the same limits as other couples in public. And remember that many people still frown on such relationships, so you may feel some heat over it. Otherwise, in a free society, there really should be no limits to happiness.
I mean.. that's what lesbians do so.. sure.
Seriously?
Yes, it's fine. Many girls learn how to kiss boys by kissing their friends... it's a safe space created by two friend girls. And really, and this is the neanderthal in me, that shit is hot!
girls are pretty, soft, clean, compassionate. how could you not want to passionately kiss them.
Because they can stab you in the back and can be very vengeful for even the smallest mishaps
1 Corinthians 6:9 Do you not know that the unrighteous and the wrongdoers will not inherit or have any share in the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived (misled): neither the impure and immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor those who participate in homosexuality,
If you are okay with a boyfriend who is okay with that, then you are okay with a boyfriend that is a cuck or who doesn't really care about you that much. If your a lesbian, sure.
I respect your opinion. but I don't think any guys who like bi girls are cucks. Guys that are cucks, like to see their girl with another guy, not another girl. ... anyway, that is mine :)
BINGO!
If he is in a relationship she is bringing a third person into it, a person that may cause conflicts in passion between the couple. She is giving her body to someone else and allowing him to have another woman intimately (possibly). Either way she is being care-free with her love and passion and not committed at all.
They are consenting adults and it they wanna do it, why not? Half of all women is at least no curious, probably 20 percent gay, and 30 100% straight. Guessing of course. No point in demonizing it
Sorry for the blunt opinion, but most guys find it arousing only when 2 feminine women kiss.
A male-lesbian kissing a feminine woman just looks weird, don't really know why, but we feel strangeness. And that has nothing to do with sexism and patriarchy, it's just biology, how our hormones shape us.
2 bisexual feminine women kissing is even hotter. It gives you anxiety and a fantasy that they could both be having a threesome with you, if the opportunity comes up. That's it, honest opinion. You can like it or not. Sorry if I offended someone.
As long as people keep it respectable, not everyone is where you are in life.
I'm long past the notion that girls want to be sexual together.
Love is love.. no matter what form it takes its special
As the song goes. I kissed a boy and a girl and I like both.
hot pics :)
@laurieluvsit thanks for the like and the pics. i've been "enjoying" them very much :)
... lol You're welcome
:) :) :)
No it's an awful thing to have happen to anyone. Homosexuality is a life ruining birth defect that we're not even putting in any effort to treat and prevent. Instead we let communists run around lying about it so they can politically exploit those suffering from it.
If that's what they both want to do then why not. I think it's wrong if they're trying to force their ways onto others the same as I don't think I should force my beliefs onto others. Really though I think we're all guilty of this to some degree.
Even if I get married I will let my wife have lesbian relationship
All women are a little lesbian, i find it cute.
Voted C.