True or false. When picking a girl out of a group for sex most guys pick the second least attractive?

You're out with your mates and you spot a group of girls. From their clothes and general behaviour you deduce that they might be up for a bit fun. You decide to take your chance and approach them.

Now I've got a theory. If you go directly to the best looking one then the risk of rejection is the highest. You'll lose face in front of your friends. Other girls in the group then think you see them as a consolation prize and reject you.

The worst looking girl should be the easiest but there's the problem, you don't want to look like you don't have standards. Worse still if she knocks you back you know you've nowhere else to go.

Now second from bottom is a safe bet, they nearly always say yes. You flatter her by picking her over her better looking friends yet still show you have standards. And if she rejects you there's still a chance of recovery with the other girls.

So am I right?
2 4

Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions

What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!

What Girls & Guys Said

2 51
  • False

  • There a guy who in theory said the same thing and the world took it on a an bussiness abdbit charnge the world. If you can find it watch A Simple Mind this movie will sjowbyou that guy

  • That's something I would do

  • got us figured out

  • It doesn't matter me

  • true, because the prettier usually brings more problems

  • Nope. I play the long game. I'm just gonna talk to the whole group and see what comes of it. If I just need a lay, I can make a phone call, so I don't feel the need to "seal the deal" on the first night.

  • False. I would try to find the one that fits in a cage and could be deprived of food long enough to be properly trained.

  • Sounds about right