I got to thinking about this recently. A lot of women out there look down on escorts and men who go to them and they think it's pathetic - and I myself am not a fan of it - but when you really think about it, what is the difference between an escort and an every day woman who really just wants to use guys for their money/resources, or who actually say they want a "sugardaddy"? To me the every day woman who's looking for money is not really a lot different than the escort except that the every day woman is generally slimy and deceitful about it. The escort makes it no secret that she does what she does for money.
But what do you think?
Which is worse: an escort? Or a woman who just gets involved with men for their money?
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
2 2
What Girls & Guys Said
24 50The escort is honestly offering a service for a fee. A woman who pretends interest or affection to get goods and services is a fraud.
Exactly said! You can ask an escort for her rates, a gold-digger has no limits.
Both suck.
An escort is waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay worse.
I mean, even if I were going to have a one night stand (I wouldn't), I would at least find her attractive in some way. Sex workers are willing to have sex with ANYONE!!! Old guys, fat ugly guys... anything.
I almosy threw up in my mouth it is so gross.
Multiple guys per night... you are screwing a girl... another mans dick was JUST in there.
Inhuman.
Irredeemably disgusting.
Generally agreeable and true. That is why you should insist on using a condom. True, with your non-digging girlfriend, you have much better sex. Or as the good #LinusTorwalds would say: "Software is like sex. It is better when it is free." But here, the gold-digging personality is asked and they are by far more worse than a KNOWN rate an escorts tells you upfront (e. g. on phone) as the gold-digger will dig on, no matter how much accounts you have.
Still they can refuse clients (and won't get money, too). But some really don't care what kind of penis enters their pussy (yes, no condom with I guess a lot?).
A woman that gets involved with a man for his money. With an escort, it's literally a business transaction. You know what you're getting involved with. There are no games.
Almost no games, when the client is new and unaware of being with an escort/prostitute.
There’s literally no difference
Escort: You know what you get. All-day: Mystery until she exposes her real self to you.
@manonfire i see your point but note I said a woman questioning whether she is being used in the moment. I don’t think I’ve ever hear any of the women I know say they have been used for sex. I was just speaking of the uncertainty both sexes seem to have when it comes to sex
Sorry @manonfire... i obviously missed the thread that time lol
@Mickey9999 That's a-okay.
Yes, I was a little confused here, too. ;-) But truth here (OT) is, I met an African being used into sex-only. :-( She had trouble finding trust in men again. From her emotions, I can totally understand her. Sadly she was to much into her religion and I don't want to be converted.
My vote is for second one
Escort is a profession where both of them knew how much they are going to pay for it
Exactly. You what you agree to and will have (money for sex/erotic massage/a nice dinner/...).
Namaste!
Those only getting involved for money.
An escort is an entrepreneur applying her skills and assets to entertain her clients.
They both know what they are, what they are doing and why they are together. There is no deception and no "secret agenda". Just a "contract" knowingly exchanging things of value between consenting parties. Nothing bad about this.
A gold digger is deceiving, manipulating and exploiting someone for personal gain. This is all bad.
If an escort girl deceives you or manipulates you, she might have a strong point of standing for it, because having sex with them may reduce your self-esteem or strightness/tightness when it comes to money. But still it would be a temporary gain for her as the client may move on.
@roland77 The terms of service with an escort are clear. A list of services for a fixed fee. Not so different from a physical therapist. You have no unrealistic expectations and if there are any emotions (It IS better to like her) they are limited. I'm not suggesting men should do this casually and frequently, but they can put a fire out.
Yes, still I don't like prostitution much because of greed for money aka. capitalism is behind it. Maybe not the prostitute/escort woman, but her "boss" (pimp, brothel owner). For example in the Roman empire, prostitutes were there for removing virginity from a man. If a prostitute does that today, she can remote-control you into withdrawing all your money from your accounts.
@roland77 Capitalism has lifted much of the world out of poverty. Hate that damned Capitalistic "greed for money"? Refuse your next paycheck. Get rid of your phone and computer while you are at it.
No, that can be put into good use and not to make some very few people rich. If I do so, the capitalism is still there because other people will just grab my "money" and properties and move on. The system itself needs to be defeated. Capitalism has NOT lifted much of the "western world" from poverty. Look at a bigger city's streets and you see poverty, beggars and poor humans. But the "3rd world" or "developing countries" have been made poor by it. Capitalism is one of the reasons, why we have very few rich and many poor people. And you and me alone cannot defeat it. We all can, not by throwing our "money" away but to slowly migrate from those papers and metal pieces away to a currency that has a real value. It is our trust in that "money" (like USD, EUR, PHP, KES, ...) that makes its value, not the piece of paper or metals being used. They are worthless. And today giro accounts exist, where "money" is just a number in a database of a computer. One big fat stock market crash and your "money" is invalid.
@roland77 Capitalism is the only way wealth is generated. Every other system depletes it. Capitalism does not guarantee equal outcomes. Only, imperfectly, equal opportunity. And a far way from that sex worker that started this. If you are American, go vote for Bernie and enjoy the day.
@Dargil Ever heard about universal basic income? That is truly equal to all humans. Capitalism make a few very rich and many ver poor. I cannot stand the biggest lie they keep repeating: "Work more and you get rich."
Okay, this is going to far. :-)
At least you know what the escort is all about
There's two kinds of whores, honest whores and dishonest whores.
Escorts are honest whores.
Non-escorts are dishonest whores. They do the exact same behavior but they try and make it seem like they don't, or it's "different when they do it." What-fucking-ever.
Probably MHO right here. "They do the exact same behavior but they try and make it seem like they don't, or it's "different when they do it." " - This speaks volumes.
Stop insulting escorts. They are doing their job and pay taxes.
Do you also insult like that male stripper?
Both are not whores! Some escorts are single mums trying to pay for their children! Really not nice!
@kim45456 I didn't mean "whore" as an insult in this context like I would if I was calling a politician a "lying whore," that would be an insult, but in this particular situation, I only mean it as a description of their job, which is to trade sex for money, which is what "whore," literally means. That's the dictionary definition.
It's up to them to take offense at my words, nobody needs you to be offended on behalf of other people. Unless you are a whore, in which case eat shit, whore. Fuck your mother.
The word "whore" is always used as an insult to degrade prostitutes
I dont understand why men like you insult them but also use their service and financially support them. Hypocrisy at its finest
Why are you so pissed now?
By Watching porn you also support them, you man hoe
@kim45456 I have never paid for porn in my life, lol. You don't know shit about me, lady. How much longer are you going to keep shooting in the dark?
You dont have to pay, watching is enough
@kim45456 Not if you have adblock, lol. I quite literally have not paid one cent for porn, and no one has ever paid one cent on my behalf. I don't support porn or prostitution or any other form of sex work in any way, shape, or form.
How do they earn money then?
Gold diggers are by far the worst women. Escort/prostitutes can be hired and finish. But those diggers? I had one only for a few times with me and she grabbed 250 EUR from me and wanted me to pay bar visits. Money is business, but love is not.
I think there's a tendency at the moment to praise escorts and strippers and porn actresses as if they are some downtrodden, misunderstood heroes, fighting the good fight and bla bla bla.
I just think they are fleecing horny men.
As to your question, in my book it's mainly a question of how much money she is extracting from men. I would wager that a high-class escort was probably making more off men than just your average gold-digger. And I see no reason to distinguish between "sugar bunnies" and escorts. One is just a eufemism for the other.
I think all of them are exploitative, but feminists have somehow convinced us to feel sorry for them, and the sex industry is promoting them as if they are rock stars. It's super lame.
I agree that escorts and hookers are too often viewed as poor souls just trying to make a living, that is true. But at the end of the day, an escort is being upfront about exactly what she does: providing men with "services" in exchange for money/"donations." An escort might very well be making more money than a gold-digger, but the bottomline is that she has already made it very clear from day one that her services are not for free and that she does have hourly rates that are often put right upfront. Basically they are saying: "I will do this with you for this amount of money if you want, and you can either pay for it or you can't. Don't want to? Don't like it? You don't have to accept." Also, some escorts are actually open about the fact that they really only provide services to wealthy men or older men. Your average gold-digger is much worse, just using what she knows a guy has, and when she's done with him or he can't give her what she wants anymore she just moves on to the next. Like a leech. Like a rat.
I disagree. There is a lot of pretending going on, even with escorts. Just the name, to begin with. Add to that stuff like "girlfriend experience", etc. In the past, I might have gone along with what you're saying and applauded their honesty, but nah. Lots of this stuff is happening online where they are basically creating their own fan clubs and fleecing guys for a few nudes. And they go to great lengths to make the guys believe that they are special and that they have a "relationship" - stuff like adding guys on SnapChat for a hefty fee, etc. In my book, all women (and men) who engage in that kind of behavior are basically manipulative and on par with tobacco corporations, gambling firms, and the like. They wreck lives. It's just that some are amateurs (gold diggers) and some are professionals (escorts, Twitter-whores, etc.)
But most men know they're faking it with the image. What still stands is the fact that ultimately her time and service presented is exactly what she says it is. You will either pay to play or you will not.
That's not strictly true. No offense, but I feel like you're giving them too much credit for their "honesty". I don't think brazenly using your genetic lottery win to exploit weak souls is impressive. I don't think the women the sex industry attracts are all "poor lost souls". I also think it attracts its fair share of sociopaths.
When I refer to their honesty I mean they're basically upfront about what they're doing as an escort, what they expect, and what they will or won't accept. Forget about GFE and "taking your problems away," we're talking about the basic thing she is being upfront about.
Okay, but aren't you just a gullible schmuck if you fall for a non-prostitute gold-digger? I mean, you should cotton on pretty quick. I have met those girls, they don't exactly hide their love of shopping.
None. They are doing what they think is right. It's their life. Let them do whatever they want.
While I've never tried prostitution as it seems like it would be too fake for me (and I don't agree with paying for sex, as I view it as an amazing experience shared enthusiastically), the escort is honest about her intentions, whereas the woman who is into the man for money is shallow and a user.
Yes, escorts are honest and must be. Else she won't get any clients. Sure, payed sex is different than with a girlfriend, my best friend told me about it.
The escort is above board - sex for money. Easy.
The gold-digger is sneaky, underhanded, has an ulterior motive for her actions.
Which do YOU prefer?
If I was given the option to have to be in a relationship with a gold-digger for one year, or sleep with an escort for one night, I would go with the latter without even thinking about it.
Correctomundo. :) OTOH, I've never had to PAY for sex. There was always some willing pussy around. ;)
@ManOnFire No second thought here, too. I better pay an escort ~100 EUR per hour than thousands of EUROs to a gold-digger.
to me they are the same thing
Perhaps it's all about being a provider. When you have money, women become more friendly for sure. It's probably not everything, but for many women it opens doors.
They both are escorts, many different ways to prostitute, but i think acting like u are girlfriend and getting in a monogamous relationship is a bigger payout and more lucrative then being a traditional escort.
If I may ask, pays out in what? Money (bad) or love (good)? From a prostitute a man/woman (yes, also them go to prostitutes) can get what she offers, if it fits to his desires. That is what a phone call is for. Ask for her services if unknown.
Payout in money. I dont consider love enrichment its not tangible and eventually dies down. I need security
Money is not bad... how is the very think that keep clothes on ure back, ure car, roof over your head, and food in your belly bad? Love doesn't keep u surviving nor in comfort its not even really real😂😂😂 its a fairytail socialized concept
Ure far to old to think a woman making a profit in exchange for her looks, emotional and physical labor, and possible ruin of her body and her mental by birthing kids is bad.
There is no sure way to prove love, its a false concept...
Money cannot buy love and love does exist in your heart feelings (those "butterfly" feelings). It also expresses itself in sexual activity for me.
I don't listen to those who have hate towards love. So sorry for you all here, who has been mislead into greed and hatred. Only those who hate don't love. You all should be ashamed of what you say here, rational thinking has destroyed love because love is never rational, it is emotional and those are never rational. "We think to much and feel to little.", once a very wise man said.
I think there's nothing wrong to go after money or use man for something else as long as you are honest and open about it.
That way if man feels it to be OK its he's choice to go with it.
depends. in the case for the woman who only cares for the money: does he know this? if he does, it's equal. if he doesn't, the latter is worse.