Why do girls only want sex in relationships with me, but don't casually hookup with me? Why are boyfriend material guys not seen as hookup material?

I'm told that im a good looking awesome guy by girls, when im in a relationship i get consistent and satisfying sex but when i am single girls for some reason dont want to hookup with me casually and dont be friends with benefits with me, they rather date me and make me wait for a relationship for sex, sometimes a single guy that is a quality man just want a fling and doesn't want to wait months to have sex! Why do you girls do this, why do you not reward a 'quality boyfriend material' guy with casual sex while lesser quality guys you casually have flings with? Why do you girls curse boyfriend material guys cursed like this by making us wait? So backwards! Should I act like a lesser quality guy? Please help me understand!
0 2

Most Helpful Guys

  • It's simple: a highly-attractive, popular guy (which mostly means that he has a high level of confidence with women, and a "doesn't take crap from anyone" attitude - but also includes physical appearance to some degree) is going to have a ton of options, and probably makes use of those options to get laid a lot with many different women - which only makes him more confident with women.

    But, while this guy is highly attractive to women, most women realize that they aren't going to "tame him" and make him monogamous or interested in a long-term relationship. So, they accept that, in order to get some attention from this guy, she's going to have to sacrifice her desire for a relationship. And while there are plenty of women who won't make such a sacrifice, there is no shortage of women who will.

    For whatever reason, women don't find you that attractive - and that's probably more a personality/attitude thing than a looks thing, but again, looks are always a factor too. And because you aren't AS attractive (and by that, I don't mean you aren't attractive - you just aren't a 9 or 10 to most women), you lack the options with women that really attractive guys have. Thus, it's more realistic for women to expect a relationship with you, and to demand one before giving you sex.

    It's a lot like a job - why does one doctor make $100,000 a year while a great neurosurgeon or plastic surgeon can make several million per year? The difference is that the latter spent extra time and effort focusing on developing those special skills - to the point of near perfection - and so they can demand a much higher price for their (more specialized) work than a GP family doctor can.

    In the same way, some guys win the genetic lotto and are born with "model" good-looks, but other guys, who are physically a 6 or 7 at best, develop their confidence and attitude to become a 9 or 10 based on those aspects. You probably could do, but you'd be have to be willing to put in the work (which you probably aren't willing to do) and to change a good deal of your thinking and values (which you probably also aren't willing to do).

    If you are hoping that women are going to change for you, you might as well forget it - it's like asking guys not to look at or pay attention to super-hot women. You can't change other people, you can only change yourself.

    • Exactly. Women will always sleep and have no string attached/passionate pornstar sex with men they find highly attractive. While having ok mundane sex with guys for relationship. Just gotta deal.

    • @Roostah Or, you do the work and make the changes to become highly attractive - which, yes, not every guy has the natural ability to become, but most do, if they'd work at it and understand how women think and what women want.

    • True.. I am the guy you mentioned.. all I truly want is one girl but I can't be tamed. When I get one I want another and another. Like I can't turn it off. . All I really want is 1 girl but I'm not boyfriend material because when I get girl , I just act more single.. more girls I get / sex the bigger my ego gets at some point the girl gives up when she sees I won't change

  • I don't know what was more painful to read, some of the female responses, or your question.

    First of all, you're setting up a false dichotomy in your mind. Just because you're in a relationship doesn't mean you have to wait 1-2+ months before having sex with the person. Similarly, just because you're not in a relationship with a person doesn't mean you're going to have sex within the first fews hours or days from when you start interacting with the person.

    Secondly, there are more guys "saying" they would like a casual relationship than there are guys who are "actually comfortable with" casual relationships. What many of these guys really mean is that they would like a relationship, just one that doesn't make them feel like some unattractive sexual loser.

    Third, sex as a reward? Either you're a girl posting as a guy, or you're extremely insecure regarding how sexually attractive women find you as a man. I'm going to assume the latter. That's ok. All is not lost. It's something you can work on, but it starts with thinking critically about your emotional reasoning, challenging it, and adopting alternative thoughts that are more grounded and consistent with a purely objective reality.

    Fourth, most girls neither want, nor are they comfortable with the idea of a casual relationship. Think of it like a man entertaining the idea of casual dating. He pays for most of the dates, she pays sometimes too, and this continues indefinitely without any kind of sex. How does the guy feel? Well, transpose that if you will onto a female. Uncommon is the woman who wants nothing more than to just hookup with hot guys. Even more rare is the woman who wants nothing more than to just hookup with YOU.

    Fifth, do you know what's not uncommon? Women who want a relationship with a guy, who love and enjoy sex, and who have worked past their fears, anxieties, pride, ego, narcissistic identification, etc., and feel comfortable enough taking action without waiting first to build the 1-2 month "we waited" narrative for her friends, family, and her personal reply of her life story before she has sex with a guy she wants.

    So, if you're conflating and building false dichotomies, and blowing off women who would otherwise make you happy, then you're only shooting yourself in the foot.

    • Hear, hear! Well done, my friend.

Most Helpful Girls

  • Why do girls only want sex in relationships with me, but don't casually hookup with me?
    Possibly because you do not present yourself as an appealing hookup option. I find gals tend to seek highly attractive guys for hookups. To me the visual stimuli arousal is a way to makeup for the high likelihood of no orgasm.

    Why are boyfriend material guys not seen as hookup material?
    Likely the same reason why hookup material/pump and dump gals are not seen as girlfriend material. That reason being people seem to categorize others and treat them according to their category.

    Why do you girls do this, why do you not reward a 'quality boyfriend material' guy with casual sex while lesser quality guys you casually have flings with?
    Possibly because many gals do not see sex as a reward. As well as it seems sex is a weapon guys use against gals. In my opinion if a gal wants a relationship wig a quality boyfriend material guy she likely rules herself out by hooking up with him as then he will categorize her as slutty/easy/not girlfriend material.

    In my opinion if guys did not seemingly shame female sexuality and have the slut/stud double standard gals probably would be more willing to have sex with non hookup material guys as it wouldn't lessen the boyfriend material guys opinion of her.

    • the thing is even if she doesn't put out to him fast but did for other men he would likely have a worse opinion of her then had she just slept with him fast.

    • @dudeman That relies on him knowing her sexual history and I find most guys do not.

    • it alwasy comes out. you can retroactively dump a girl for shit in the past. happens all the time.

    • Show All
  • Good looking guys are intimidating and most of the time us girls think we're not good enough for them. Some also think that just because they see an attractive guy, that all they like are the obviously pretty girls which kinda bums us out. Also girls get judged more than guys do by the number of partners they have so they like to keep that number as low as they can which I don't get why. I've had hookups with at least 6 guys which is "way too much" for a girl but I don't care. You just have to find a girl who likes sex!

  • Hey its not all woman. I offered my current boyfriend the friends with benefits deal right off the bat and he almost stopped talking to me completely. He said no he isn't that type of guy and wants a relationship not just sex. And guess what I started dating him to get it. I would have preferred the casual sex thing instead always less complicated. But he is the first to reject that deal from me. So just hold out until you find the woman that is wanting just hook UPS with you. They are out there.

Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions

What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!

What Girls & Guys Said

9 13
  • Well for starters, what environment are you trying to find a casual partner? If you're meeting girls in class, around school, through work or a situation like that, MOST people aren't going to be into casual dating. It's just a matter of ratios. Now if you frequent clubs, bars, parties then your probability of meeting someone also looking for a hookup goes up, considerably. Maybe start with where you're trying to find like minded individuals.

  • Could it be that you're not pursuing girls who are interested in casual sex? Not everyone wants to have casual sex.

  • MOST girls don't want friends with benefits or hook ups at all, don't take it personally.

  • You hang around too many high quality girls. Poor thing.

  • It's because you're not an attractive partner for it. It could be your ego or the fact that they don't want you. We put up with certain things in relationships when it's sex the bar is different.