Would you have a sexless relationship?
Not for religious reasons but only because your partner doesn't want to be a parent.
Updates:
+1 y
Sexless= no sexual intercourse. No p in the v.
+1 y
Thank you for the opinions. I asked this question because of the increasing amount of men that are anti abortion saying "just dont have sex if you don't want a kid" which it seems like the majority would not be open to a sexless (intercourse-less) relationship.
2 2
What Girls & Guys Said
32 91Oral, condoms, other birth control, anal etc. Why would a relationship have to be sexless just because they don't want kids?
Because they don't want to take the small risk
I think they don't know just how small that risk is.
I wouldn't.
Sex should be done after marriage which means if the girl gets pregnant, everyone will celebrate and be happy...
If they don't want kids, they will take maximum precautions and if something wrong happens than they will have the baby which is thr seed of their love...
Never. Sex is an integral part of happy relationship.
There are several women I am in a sexless relationship with. I think they are called friends.
A sexless marriage? Not for me. I like to keep all my options open.
Yes, I have several good friendships and I wouldn't want to miss them in my life!
Romantic relationship not a friendship
A relationship without sex is a friendship to me (and to most people).
You make-out with your friends?
Nope. And you think making out isn't sexual? lol
By sexless I meant sexual intercourse. I don't know why some people are struggling to get that lol
But the more pressing question - why on Earth would I not have sex with the person I love and feel sexually attracted to, if I could? Would would make myself suffer like that? I'm not a masochist.
Maybe they're struggling because you wrote "sex-less". Intercourse is just one aspect of sex.
This was more targeted towards people who say to girls to just not have sex in response to being pro-choice. Obviously, sex is a two way party... I just wanted to see how many people would be open to something like this
Most couples (at leats young couples) don't want to have kids (at least not yet) and they still all have frequent intercourse. There's a think called protection. There's actually several different kinds of protection. So why on Earth would couples opt for not having intercourse when they can just use protection?
I agree with you
Yes. For sure.
Nope.
She is friendzoned directly.
Nope. Never. Huge deal breaker
Nah, I wouldn't
nah i couldn't do it.
Not saying someone who doesn't want children is evil. But I martied her for the soul purpose of having children she even agreed. But then she ran off and had a child out of wed lock. So knowing I want children no I can't won't stay in a relationship where my partner does not.
there's other ways to prevent that..
Hell no!!
I don't want to be a parent, so I got a vascetomy. No kids, and we can have sex.
Fuck no! No man should tolerate a sexless relationship.
Naah, I wouldn't get involved with someone who's that stupid to not know about contraceptives and condomos!!
Why not
u mean friendship?
yeah i have loads of them with all my male friends