Would you marry a 35 year old that slept with a 100 different guys?

[Anonymous]

[MrOracle]

That's like asking if I'd pay new price for an 5 year-old car with 200,000 miles on it. Not a chance. A 35-year-old woman who slept with 100 guy is a woman who didn't take relationships - much less marriage and husband - seriously as an idea when it mattered, and now, at 35, realizes she can't keep up with the "hot girl can do whatever she wants" game anymore, and is looking for a man to come in and save her. But it's essentially asking a man to pay full, "new" price for that 5 year old, 200,000 mile car.
Is it impossible to find a man who will do that? No - there are some dumb, desperate men out there - but few men who respect themselves would accept that deal, unless he's 55-60 and has a lot more money than prospects with women.

A man looking for a wife doesn't generally expect a virgin, but he IS looking for a relatively low body count, because women with high body counts don't know how to be happy with a single man long-term. Most have never tried. And it's your right to live any way you please - but you still have to accept the consequences of whatever decisions you've made.

Less than 50% of men today plan to marry at all - because marriage (and divorce) is so incredibly one-sided, with virtually all the benefits going to women and all the responsibility going to men - and so of the men willing to consider marriage at all, they're generally looking for younger women, with no children, low body counts, who WANT to be stay-at-home moms and raise the kids and take care of their husband when he's home, while he's out earning the money to support the family. Yes, a few exceptions exist, but generally, the men still considering marriage are also realizing that marriage is only worth it if HE's getting something HE wants out of the deal.

Marrying a woman with a high body count - who isn't likely to be satisfied long-term, and is more likely to be "independently-minded" and uncooperative - is like knowingly accepting a time bomb into your life. Men know that all you need to do is decide you aren't into him anymore, and you can divorce him and financially rape him. The courts will overwhelming side against him - he's seen it, and he's seen friends and relatives go through it - so why would he agree to a situation that has such a low chance of long-term success?

I don't mean to be harsh or mean - I'm just being real and telling you how most men see things, because you need to know the truth. Again, yes, there are some beta males out there who might marry you, but they aren't the kind of men you would ever respect, or really even want - and, so, again, the likelihood of long-term success is very small.

[genericname85]

well think of it like that: it's 17 years that a person could legally have had sex. realistically speaking, they probably had 20 years of sex at that point. let's just assume she only had sex with every guy once. that's only sex for 2 times every month. that doesn't seem so much to me.

and you know a woman that is good looking and attractive and has a strong drive could easily pile up 100 guys in just a few months of "promisquous" phase or hooking up.

[ChrisMaster69]

A lot depends on the girl and why the various encounters.

the humorous thing is if the girl said 3, a guy would not know the difference.

who would you marrysomeone truthfully saying 100 or a girl lying and saying 3 rather than 100.

[pajamasam]

Nopr

[summiter]

As long as she had no STDs then yes.

[Leavesbound]

Sure, why not, probably don't have to teach her much and that would save time.

[Dargil]

If I knew it, no. Not 100, not 50, not 25 maybe (just maybe) 10 at 35.
Otherwise, I'd have to wear one of these.

[scuff1986]

Sure why not

[MrOracle]

Well, statistically, of the women with 50+ partners who marry, only 8% of them are still married 5 years later. Why? Because such women have never been with a man for very long, and have never felt any need to compromise or not get her way, and so it's not in her nature to do so. And while many women believe that marriage will magically make her change, it doesn't. And so as soon as something makes her unhappy, she's going to fall back to what she's always done: leave him and move on. Except now she's married to you, and can easily use the courts to collect cash and prizes from you on the way out. But, maybe you don't care about any of that... I'm not trying to tell you how to live.

[Inexpensivefurniture]

If I was also around 35, sure. I don't care about my partner's body count

[exitseven]

No, I think that someone who has been with that many guys has commitment issues.

[FakeName123]

Absolutely not.

[GermanGuy87]

hopefully not but you never know

[razzmatazz21]

Definitely as long as she's faithful

[cjmtherfcker]

Would hope i could do better for myself

[AmeerX]

I think I would like to talk to her and see

[Dchrls78104]

Why don't I build my house on the highway? No, absolutely not!

[vald9inches]

Yes i would

[Wiredone]

I don't care what happened in her past. Id only care about what she does in the present and the future

[In_Klamath]

If we got to that point hell yes.. I don't hold the past against anyone.

[COMMODOREII]

Yeah sure why not

[Cowboy6666]

If she is loyal to me after our marriage/relationship
and we love each other I might

[TallAnon]

You lost me at 35.