If a woman decides at 8 months pregnant that she doesn't want the baby should it be legal for her to get an abortion?
Anonymous
If a woman decides for some reason at 8 months pregnant that she doesn't want to have the baby should it be legal for her to get an abortion?
I'm not talking about exceptions like fetal health problems or the pregnancy causing a substantial risk to the health or life of the mother or anything like that. I'm talking about her just not wanting the baby.
8 months = between 32 and 36 weeks
Yes. It should be legal to abort an 8 month old baby
Vote A
No. Abortion shouldn't be legal that far along in pregnancy
Vote B
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
GirlGuyPlease select your age
10
Most Helpful Girls
Pink934Xper 6
+1 y
Absolutely disgusting. But I don't agree with abortion at any stage, if you don't want the baby, at least put it up for adoption. I couldn't imagine being pregnant that long knowing my child was practically a fully-formed human being and then effectively kill it. It's just not right 😓
1301
AstefersXper 4
+1 y
No, that's too far. My son was born at 32 weeks and my daughter at 34. Completely healthy as if they were full term. That's murder of a human in my eyes by then, it's not like the baby is just cells or something. That would be so sad.
0100
MlleCakeEditor
+1 y
There's no one in the United States who would perform a fully elective abortion at that late.
No one is pushing for this right.
2403
CarpetDenimMaster
+1 y
No way
1100
CarpetDenim
+1 y
Thank you
Most Helpful Guys
Anonymous
+1 y
Can you imagine like 60 years in the future where we are allowed to abort our kids until they are a legal adult.
"Oh my, Susan I just aborted my kid he became such an financial inconvenience and I changed my mind"
Nah boi I realised I responded to the wrong question I'm a knob. 😂
ZoeAdams2
+1 y
Disposable people? I know how some "dispose" of others by ill treatment. But that is a scary future.
NamkrowXper 6
+1 y
At that stage, it's a baby. I support a woman's right to choose, not that my opinion on the subject matters all that much, but at 8 months pregnant, that is a living person and it should be carried to term. Adoption is a thing for a reason.
Way too late for that. At this point the baby is fully formed and some women give birth at 8 months. Adoption is the way to go.
1500
HurlyburlyGuru
+1 y
By that time she could also give it to adoption...
0400
ladsinEditor
+1 y
Don't think so
0100
Mexicoman101Guru
+1 y
Absolutely fucking not.
0100
omgjassyMaster
+1 y
Yeah. You already asked this though. Why you so interested, is somebody pregnant?
0100
Asker
+1 y
That was a different question. And yes my wife is pregnant
omgjassy
+1 y
You wish.
Asker
+1 y
I'm serious
Show All Show Less
omgjassy
+1 y
Right.
omgjassy
+1 y
Wait months? I thought weeks. No 8 months is too late and not even possible
Asker
+1 y
Should I tell my wife not to get an abortion
omgjassy
+1 y
Sweet dreams
Asker
+1 y
It's not my bedtime
omgjassy
+1 y
Sounds like it is
Asker
+1 y
Why?
omgjassy
+1 y
You’re telling your dreams to me
Asker
+1 y
But I don't want a kid
omgjassy
+1 y
Plot twist. I like it
Asker
+1 y
Like what?
omgjassy
+1 y
The twist
Asker
+1 y
What twist?
omgjassy
+1 y
I don’t remember
Asker
+1 y
Interesting
mr_mxy
+1 y
Well congratulations
jacquesvolMaster
+1 y
8 Months? You're trolling.
0100
CharleslvajrXper 6
+1 y
At 8 months and "abortion" is murder. I don't care what anyone else thinks but anyone performing an "abortion" at 8 months should be slowly boiled alive.
Killing a 3 year old is just as bad as killing a 4 year old. By that thinking...
0100
LegateLaniusMaster
+1 y
No. That is disgusting. Too late, lady.
0100
Anon-ymous1Editor
+1 y
Pretty sure third-trimester abortions are illegal for exactly the reasons you're insinuating.
1100
lilmissumshineExplorer
+1 y
Depends on the situation. some people don't find out their kids are special needs until late in pregnancy or after birth
0246
ClassyMoose
+1 y
Some people don't find out there children are special needs until after birth. Does that change the morality of killing them?
lilmissumshine
+1 y
If they have no quality of life why keep them here for your own selfish needs?
lilmissumshine
+1 y
I don't know why everyone is getting so butthurt lol.. y'all know darn well you don't have the patience to deal with a retarded child.
Show All Show Less
ClassyMoose
+1 y
I think you lack the patience. I just can't figure out why you treat them as lesser beings.
lilmissumshine
+1 y
I work with a kid who is severly special needs. so far has had 6 surgeries and has 7 more to go.
lilmissumshine
+1 y
The child can't walk, talk, chokes and vomits when fed,16 years old and in diapers
lilmissumshine
+1 y
Can you please explain what kind of quality of life that is? and the child's on 14 medications
ClassyMoose
+1 y
So why keep feeding him. Why keep changing his diapers. Why keep giving him surgeries. Because he is a human being with a right to life. Who are you to decide who is worth living?
lilmissumshine
+1 y
Who are you to decide if the child even wants to be on this Earth? would you if you had all those problems, get made fun of everyday. you're being selfish
lilmissumshine
+1 y
The child is suffering.
ClassyMoose
+1 y
I never made the choice to keep him alive. The original topic was an unborn baby. How could you know that it wants to die. You would just kill it in case?
lilmissumshine
+1 y
How do you know it wants to live? if the child's a vegetable would it even know the difference? no
ClassyMoose
+1 y
I don't know whether it wants to live or die. I am saying that the default should always be life when the answer is unknown. I guess some of us just feel like infanticide is wrong.
lilmissumshine
+1 y
Yeah you keep saying ,"oh it's a life it's a life". until you have to take care of them you don't get it. people don't have lives because of it, couples can't travel, their life is spent in a Dr office. thats not a life
lilmissumshine
+1 y
I'd get rid of it
mr_mxy
+1 y
Ok wtf i have autism and have a very good life. I am passing all my classes in college. Yet you would have killed me as a child because im special needs. I honestly hope you never have kids.
lilmissumshine
+1 y
Did I say anything about autism? maybe your condition is affecting your reading skills
ClassyMoose
+1 y
I shouldn't be surprised that you would attack someone's disability, after all you seem you want them "removed."
lilmissumshine
+1 y
You're annoying and blocked. get a life
IDKwhoim
+1 y
u are in need of life more than him
lilmissumshine
+1 y
No one's talking to you flat chest
mr_mxy
+1 y
Um no i learned how to read and currently read Shakespeare and homer in my free time. Something many people without disabilities do. It did affect my reading when i was younger but i LEARNED. You may have not mentioned autism by name but you made it very clear you would have killed me given the chance simply because you think my life is less than. Also i would like you to specify what disabilities you would be willing to kill an infant over. But at this point it seems like you are just a murderous ableist
lilmissumshine
+1 y
@mr_mxy you need to go up and read what I'm referring too. i never mentioned "learning disabilities". I more so talked about kids in a vegetative state and mutiple health problems.
lilmissumshine
+1 y
Autism is not a "health" related issue
lilmissumshine
+1 y
@mr_mxy and not making fun of u. i have ADHD. a lot of times I skip over important details when reading
mr_mxy
+1 y
Its still considered a mental disability. Frankly i think someone making a descision for someone else bothers me especially when it comes to life and death
IDKwhoim
+1 y
try another insult I'm not flat chested
mr_mxy
+1 y
@IDKwhoim well even if you were its not a bad thing.
lilmissumshine
+1 y
@mr_mxy a "learning" disability is not the same as a child with multiple physical anomalies and in a vegetative state.
skittles2017Yoda
+1 y
It is not healthy to do that that far along
0100
BleepRawrsaurus_RexYoda
+1 y
Stop asking these
0301
Asker
+1 y
Make me
BleepRawrsaurus_Rex
+1 y
Please stop asking questions like these
Asker
+1 y
Okie I will
Show All Show Less
BleepRawrsaurus_Rex
+1 y
Thank you I appreciate that
Asker
+1 y
You're welcome
phonetic_auXper 4
+1 y
Its murder killing a 8 month old baby.
0100
IchewonplasticXper 5
+1 y
Absolutely not
0200
disgustingweebtrashMaster
+1 y
A person who decides to abort an 8 month old baby should get the death penalty
0200
mrkdvsnGuru
+1 y
Abortion should be illegal for ANY # of months, but especially if there's a heartbeat detected, or if the baby's far along enough to feel pain from it's murder.
0100
ThreeSheetsToTheWindExplorer
+1 y
No. I am pro-choice but a line has to be drawn somewhere.
Sexual Relationships 
Sexual Health 
Most Helpful Girls