To your question: no it is not wrong. If that is a strong moral that you want to share with someone who will become your half, than that is respectable. Now, your other answers and conclusions about women who don't follow that belief are a little messed up. The counter would be, what sane woman would want to take a man that is used goods? Alternatively, why is the woman an item now, instead of a human being?
The reason a failing marriage hurts men (money wise) is actually a remanent from the ages BEFORE feminism. Women would not have jobs, and if they did would get a fraction of the pay, so the split of goods was to help compensate their "inability" to survive once the main wage earner disappeared.
Oldest profession in the world? Prostitute.
History of man believes most early cultures had matrilineal lines and passed wealth down the woman's side. This is supported by many different native american tribe customs. Why? Because you can always tell who the mom is, but not the father.
One of the most glamorous jobs for women during the silver screen era? Holly wood star (and boy did a lot of them get around, even when it WAS taboo. Tabloids galor!)
The first risings of women being okay to sleep around would be during the 1920s. Considering you still have the 1950s with the classic nuclear family and 2.5 kids, this would be a strong case against the idea that culture supporting wonton sex, led to increase in divorce. If a woman is more successful than a man, she often has a loss of assets in today's divorces. Now - how items are split up is different. Normally a man gets liquid assets/car and the woman gets physical assets/house, particularly if she has primary care of children. Why? Because a kid can get on the bus for school, but they don't want kids couch surfing. If a man gets the kids, the reverse is normally true.
As to promiscuity of either sex, men used to have harems and it was considered a sign of prosperity in the bible to be able to support multiple wives. They did this after marriage, so what does this say about them?
Henry the VIII had 6 wives, two of which were executed, and started the Church of England because his wives didn't give him a legitiment son.
During the history of war men (good "Christian" men) have frequently raped women. Men PAY to get in to strip clubs, and they are the ones who PAY for prostitutes. And you better believe they are "good christian men" too.
As you said "that was probably harsh and disrespectful." It was also ignorant. Particularly when you start citing history, because historically the question can be turned on men.
People calling you a loser for waiting for sex is wrong. Condemning everyone with the same title just because they don't is equally petty.
Divorce isn't always an evil. People used to have pre-arranged loveless marriages, get beaten daily, told they were nothing, and would yell and fight until they reached the grave. If the person you loved, is no longer that person, isn't it better?3 0 1 2An unmarried woman that isn't a virgin has no intrinsic value.
Except for what is in her head or heart. The love she gives other people, and the positive impacts she can make on the world. She can have the cure for cancer in her brain. Have saved people from drowning in the aftermath from tsunamis. She can build bridges, and friendships, and support people when they are down, and love the sinner but hate the sin. She can be forgiving, and follow the golden rule of treat others how you want to be treated and hold off judgement.
Every human has an intrinsic value in that they change something about the world. That SOMEONE loves them or they love someone. That they make ripples. You hate that little ass who just stole from the store? Well he also is the only child left of a lone mom who writes letters every day to the jail. He has intrinsic worth to someone. An unmarried man that isn't a vigin has an intrinsic value? Why? How about a married man that is no longer a virgin but has the nerve to cheat on his wife?
I think, so long as you're waiting as well, it's perfectly fine to have that restriction. I don't think that women are slut sjust because they have sex. I think it's the attitude that they have towards it that matters.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3oe1lK5MKw&feature=related
I think that, so long as you hold yourself to the same standards, it's perfectly fine to expect a woman to be a virgin when you get married.
Watch this, and a few more videos. I think this guy does a great job explaining a strong, healthy and proper point of view on waiting till marriage. I, personally, don't hold the same beliefs and I don't necessarily belive everything he says but I think it's a good point of view for people.
So I understand you wanting a virgin but don't assume that every woman that has sex before marriage is a whore. I have, with my very serious boyfriend. We love each other and that is one of the ways we show it. That's not slutty, is it? To want to express love to someone that you care very deeply about?
So just don't generalize everyone, okay? Understand that there are girls who have unprotected, drunken, anonymous sex with all kinds of men but that's not every one.
I understand your views and respect them, because you hold yourself to the same standards but please don't think you're any better than any one else because of your beliefs about sex and don't call other people crude or rude names. That's all.
It's a good question though, one that doesn't deserve all the had you got.
Also, ellesaur- statistics show that men need marriage more than women to make them happy. So it does, in some ways, hurt them more.3 1 1 3Yeah except when things don't last. That's the problem with not waiting until marriage. Lots of "serious" relationships end long before marriage is a factor. Those women might not be sluts but it shows a definitive lack of common sense, and I definitely wouldn't want a used woman.
Not necessarily. Common sense, to me, says, I'm in a committed, very serious, very trusting, loving, honest relationship which we both don't want to see end and neither of us would do anything to end it so sex is okay. However condoms are still necessary and other protections must be taken. And that part is using common sense as well. My question to you is- why do you care so much that your wife is a virgin? Lets take out of the equations that you are a virgin. Why does it matter if she's is?
It shows me she is serious about commitment and that she hasn't already given herself to someone else. It also is the only sure way to know that a woman hasn't been tainted with certain diseases or has had immoral sexual dealings in the past. Also, a virginal woman is more likely to bond from sex. Also less baggage from previous relationships. Besides that it is slightly intimidating to have a woman with more sexual experience, and to a lesser extent it's territorial: Men don't share well
I am a virgin, and I am waiting for the right guy, maybe marriage.. I'm not sure how my life will turn out. When I do have sex I want to feel safe. But not just because of the emotional tangibleness I am exposed to, when with a sexual partner. I will wait because I don't want to be branded as a slut. As simple as that. I DO mind the social conviction and I don't wish to deal with it because I feel like having sex. I just don't think it is worth it. Mostly it goes the same for every girl, even though many would never admit to this.
Now if a girl is more "free" then I am, and people can't bother her as easily, that doesn't mean she is any less of a girlfriend or a person. Even more so, she is probably either a stronger personality or more carefree then I am.
You asses her based on whether she had a man penetrate her or not before.
She is a human being that is not defined by her sexual experience. Her being a virgin reveals nothing but the fact that she is waiting for marriage, or looking for the right guy. That is not a personality trait. That is a preference that is usually backed up by fear of irrational social rejection.
So your "virgin-search quest" does tell me something about you. You are petty and superficial. Even though I am a virgin, knowing you are looking for one, would be a big minus for you in my book.2 1 1 2Note that I am talking about a girl, who did not sleep with million guys. Rejecting her for her sexual history in this case would be completely normal. You could be afraid she will give you a disease or have sex and then just dump you. That I can understand.
You're just too young to be a slut, that's all. Eventually you'll be damaged goods too.
Go troll somewhere else... >.>
Most Helpful Guys
WOMEN TODAY:
1) Have an EXCESSIVE number of sexual partners then LIE about it to everyone (it is the single deepest darkest lie in their black hearts)
2) Party their youth away
3) Neglect sweet guys in favor of LOSERS AND DRAMA
They do this until they are SPENT USED UP TRASH and totally past their physical prime. Once all these guys she turned you down for have spermed her mouth and p**** and after she has swallowed their come etc - and they have used her up like a cheap piece of sh*t - anmd she has cheated on them and all that drama - ONCE HER LOOKS START SLIPPING ANS SHE GETS OLDER - then she will come looking for a "nice successful family orientated man with a good income and morals etc" to give her the live she thinks she is f***ing ENTITLED TO! And she is going to PRETEND to have been looking for this all along while she f***ed men who where losers and tried to "change them". She is going to try to convince you she is the Virgin Mary or has only had a few guys etc - IT'S ALL A LIE TO GIVE HERSELF THE WHITE PICKET FENCE AND MAN SHE PUT ON THE SHELF SHE FEELS SHE'S ENTITLED TO.
The games up ladies. Your not fooling anyone anymore. Only a few of you are getting away with this. Most of you find out the hard way when you can't get the same quality man you were capable of getting at 23. So you settle for 10th best - IF YOUR LUCKY. Use up your youth? Fine. For every action there is a counter reaction.
Over 29 = USED UP TRASH GOOD FOR ONLY ONE THING.
Any man who is PATHETIC enough to be the VICTIM of these women "game plan" deserves what he gets :The USED PARTY WHORE that everyone else f***ed first.
It's not about viewing women as "objects". It's about a persons BEHAVIOR AND CONSEQUENCES FOR YOUR BEHAVIOR. Love me for who I am! Not what I have done in my past! NOT GOING TO WORK LADIES. Can you imagine a job interview. The boss says "I see you had a allot of jobs in the past several years mind if I call a few for a reference"? And you say "hey listen - THAT'S ALL IN THE PAST - take me for the person I am now".
This is not fair to ANY good man out there. It's also incredibly insulting.
And ladies. Don't respond with the word ALL. NOBODY EVER SAID THE WORD ALL. I'm reading this word again and again in the comments.
The majority of women are like this. Not ALL. The majority. Learn the difference!0 0 1 0Everyone has a right to an opinion... Doesn't mean that your opinion sounds like it came from fortune cookie, written by a retard. But hey. Kudos to you for standing up for what you believe in.
As for this topic. If you want a girl who has not had sex. Then go find a virgin. There are millions who wait until they are married. I think that's a beautiful and wonderful notion as you learn each other and learn the joys of love making (and getting your groove on) together.
Not for me tho but thxs. I judge no one. Everyone has a vice, and everyone has baggage. If you spend all your time worrying about if she had a **** in her mouth then it means your not taking the time to actually know her as person. And then what's the point really. I say give me a girl who knows her body, who knows how to please a man and knows what she wants as well. I repsect that. And since its PROVEN that 1 in every 3 girls are raped at some point then you have to start looking at the big picture. I mean can you really blame a girl/woman who is uncle, or father, or friend, or someone they trusted ripped their innocence from them?
Like watching wolves ripping apart their catch after a kill... Disturbing doesn't even cover it.
So ladies don't worry bout guys like this. And for you dip sh*ts that are fine and then start asking her about her past relationships and questions about sex. And can't handle it and turn into whining, controlling, possessive and un-trusting shells of your once glorious self's? You get what you deserve and you know what when she's gone it's going to hurt like hell. AND YES the new guy treats her 10000 times better then you ever did and doesn't burden her with mountains of insecurities...
Marriage is a piece of paper and a promise. I know couples who are awesomely in love, happy , and both of them had sex long before getting together. And have been married LONG before the actual ceremony.. I say live. Share yourself with those that you want to share with. Some of the best memories you will ever have are on those nights. They define you as a person, and you grow from them, both the good and the bad, and the moments where dream becomes something tangible and you have elevated if at least for that moment to something higher then yourself.
/2cents1 0 0 0Agree, it happened to me but from a stranger... and someone that would hold that against me is not worth my time anyways
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!What Girls & Guys Said
68 40nothing wrong with it...just good luck finding someone who hasnt.
2 0 2 2Hi there,
Before I read your updates to this question I was feeling sorry for you , I felt that the sociological impact (yes sociological not psycological!) had made a great impact on you for asking this question. However seeing as how you've just called women sluts and brought feminism into something , I darn't say you're just as bad as these people for asking the question you are asking.
Society plays a BIG impact on everyone, it's just how we choose to accept it that makes our bounderies, you however have just pretty much shown us that you too fit in that sociological bounderies, and that upsets me. I no longer feel sorry for you. A man not accepting to marry or date a woman who's previously already engaged in sexual intercourse is on the same level or judgement as someone who calls a woman a slut for simply enjoying sexual activities.
Your question imho is no longer reasonable, how can you sit there and judge someone when you're here to give out about others judging you. It doesn't make sense.
Either change your view point and stop listening to SOCIETY's views ,or continue to question why you SEE IT WRONG for a man to refuse to date or marry a woman that has previously engaged in sexual activity!1 0 1 2You can marry who you want, if you want a virgin wife, then that's your perogative. You should be careful with your wording I disapprove of the word slut, its used so badly and usually by men who can't tell the difference between a woman whose just had a lot of relationships, to a girl who just likes to f*** anything that comes her way and even then it don't make her a slut...and boy oh boy, if you believe guys don't do this kinda thing, then you're wrong.
In the good old days, men could marry multiple wifes...i mean, if that isn't having your cake and then eating it, and then having some for dessert...then I don't know what is.
but at the end of it all, you have the right to your opinion and your way of living...2 0 1 3Sluts can have standards too. If a woman has ever had casual sex I'd say she's a slut. Or cheated or had sex outside a relationship or slept with a guy she just met that day. Or has been in a sex video or has ever been with more than 5 men total.
Well I guess it depends on your defintion, see my idea of a slut is someone who goes after other peoples men...deliberatly...and girls who literally wear next to nothing when they go out. But I wouldn't class someone who has had a one night stand as a slut. Everyone has a different view, I've asked this question at work, and answers are similar, but not always the same.
I think most women and men would agree with most of my definition that casual sex = slut
The poster is just TROLLING. (Question has been Reported)
No real human being that is male would genuinely think like this.
It's purposefully written with the malicious intent to get a "rise" out of any female audience and irritate their insecurities.
Men love sex, and embrace (not oppose) the feminist movement and sexual revolution.
A woman who has sex is not a "wh0re," that would be your mother (a woman who waited and abstained from sex "a virgin," until she found the highest bidder for her vagina, and then sold herself under the guise of love).
How that's more virtuous in character or morality than a woman who simply had fun and enjoyed her youth, and is now honestly wanting to settle down with a man is beyond me.2 0 1 2Are you asking this question from a christian perspective?
0 0 1 1
Most Helpful Girls