




As a lesbian, I give her a perfect 10. She has meat on her bones in all the right places. She got curves and a smaller boob size, but I like the fact that she a celebrity with a normal women's body. She fine and those curves are nice to hold on to. The way she is built is amazing.
But let me get this out here all women are beautify in their own way. I'm just answering the question.
They are not the most flattering images of her there are others that she looks much much better in! The GQ spread was pretty good! :o)
Of course, but that was a professional photoshoot
it is still the same body - does it make a difference?
Um have you heard of photoshop, and even if that application was not used it still is professional production with perfect lighting, makeup, after production editing, camera angles etc . The photos taken seem less professional, and to me she looks like a real sexy woman. It is not the same body, it is a social construction. In places like GQ Even a ameture in social media can manipulate the way they look with different camera angles and filters and cropping etc.
She has an average body but she really is gorgeous. 😍
She is really attractive, and would be more attractive if she doesn't have that tattoo on her belly
Thanks :)
ok average... perhaps if she had a wider torso she might b hotter... but not bad at all
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!Well having mutilated her body with that ridiculous tattoo across her stomach.. Then at most a 5.
7. Good, not shockingly good, but good.
Her body is a 3/10.
I don't think these photos do her justice
Also I think she's gorgeous :D
I didn't put the photoshopped perfect photos on purpose.. you know, this is more real
Not necessarily the images look very flattened. I don't think these portray her true to life proportions
8.5 I'd say. This girl is stunning.
Most Helpful Girls