Uncut guys are more sensitive so it can be more fun but they tend to climax faster if you pull their foreskin back while doing it.
Exactly, you do know tour stuff😉
I'm uncut and I've only ever had 1 chick make me climate
climax. (climate. haha!)
Eh hem... Who doesn't know that the skin pulls back tight? Cut or uncut, when it's hard it's the same.
I tend to think so, but I don’t have first hand experience. Lol
I do! 😇
Well then thank you for sharing :)
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!I voted C, both are fine.
I really don't care.
Everything else about the man is more important than this. If I like the man, I'd work with whatever he's got. It's completely irrelevant to me. I just want him to be happy, feel good. That's it.
i don't mind giving a blowjob to uncut but i prefer cut... usaully it's a surprise when it comes time to suck a man's penis.
Lol! I like how you said “surprise” like opening a present
it's an exciting moment like opening a Christmas present
hopefully you get a day at the Spa gift certificate and not a pair of socks. lol
I know I going to be in the minority here, just because of the numbers of men in the US who are uncircumcised is so low (but getting higher!), but I prefer uncircumcised! First off a circumcised man is virtually indistinguishable from a circumcised man after he becomes erect and the foreskin retracts. However, it’s important to know that circumcision was pushed in America by John Harvey Kellogg, when he was Director of the Battle Creek Sanatorium in Michigan. (YES the cornflakes guy!) Battle Creek combined a sanatorium with a health spa and a high class hotel, and church, it was opened By the Seventh Day Adventists, who are vehemently anti-masturbation! Also, by the way cornflakes we’re invented by Kellogg to help stop masturbating! The guy was OBSESSED with health and Godliness (which meant… NO masturbation!) boys, mostly from wealthy and emerging middle class families who were even suspected of masturbating were sent to Kellogg’s “hospital” which was basically a pseudoscience health farm! The boys there for suspected masturbation were treated with a very bland diet as Kellogg believed that foods that were too flavorful could “excite the libido as well as the pallet” This lead to the invention of cornflakes as a breakfast food! Boys who were caught masturbating while at Battle Creek (or even suspected of masturbating, by (for example) one boy simply missing a bible reading one evening) resulted in forcible circumcision, against their will! Sound familiar? It’s the current rationale for female genital mutilation (FGM). So if FGM is a violation of human rights, how is male genital mutilation any different? Anyone who has a boy and wants them circumcised should be required to watch it… its brutal! There is NO anesthesia used, except a. “Numbing cream” which is usually applied just seconds before the circumcision, guaranteeing that it doesn’t work! The boys scream and literally shake, during the procedure, with many passing out from the shock and trauma. (Leading many doctors to say “it’s so relaxing many patients fall asleep”!) If a doctor cannot tell the difference between sleep and passing out from shock and trauma… they shouldn’t be practicing medicine! To be clear… Im against circumcising babies, I am NOT against men who are circumcised, and enjoy oral sex with them, I merely prefer an intact man. I believe if men prefer being circumcised, they should make that choice for themselves when they reach adulthood, 18!
I agree with you! Thanks for sharing!
One last thing… there are THOUSANDS of sexual sensory nerve endings in the foreskin, allowing me to pleasure my lover in many additional ways during oral sex! For one, putting my tongue inside the foreskin, before he’s completely hard, and circle my tongue around his head, another is to similarly put my tongue inside the foreskin and slide down and stimulate the sensitive “v” part (the frenulum). Sask during the blowjob, instead of just rubbing my tongue on his frenulum, I also have his foreskin which is now below his head! Intact guys love that!
You are so welcome!
Both are fine. With uncut guys, if you're really concerned about the 'extra' that comes with one. Simply using one hand to get a good grasp up near the top and pull down towards the base and hold it there, after that , it's pretty much like being with a cut guy. But, really isn't a big, take some time to get comfortable with uncut ones and then have some fun with them, the guy will appreciate the effort.
As long as they keep it clean, I prefer uncut. There are just more options as to what you can do.
Prefer uncut but it doesn’t really make much difference and I can’t imagine many people care very much
More important is to be big but most important is that it’s CLEAN!!
Wash your dicks properly boys 🙄
Seriously. Grown men, know how to wash your dick
I've given head to both, and I find there's more you can do with an uncut guy so its a bit more fun.
Does your wife agree? I believe she has had both experiences with you.
Yes, she has experienced both (and in-between) with me and prefers un-cut.
Lovely. Good to know. :)
A cut dick tasted better every time in my experience.
As an uncut man, I'm hoping for uncut heroes.
I lack a horrific insecurity about any facet of my penis though, it's the one thing about me I've never felt insecure about.
Besides zits. I don't know about other guys but I still get the rare zit on my dick and it's fuckin' frustrating.
That’s great that you are not insecure!
About my penis? No. About everything else? Horribly.
Lol, one mystery person disagrees with me and my uncut penis.
As a guy, I don't like blow jobs. I find them too ticklish. I'd rather have the real thing!
Circumcised! I just like circumcised with a larger head
U love getting chocked on circumcised hard cocks
... and this is why I will forever be grateful that my father insisted on me being
circumcised when I spawned.
thank you dad
so many fucking scum begs that love to gentialy mutiate boys and have them have painful erections and desfuctions. you all make me fucking sick
Shouldn't really matter, since he would be hard. So the skin isn't in the way. It would be easier to pleasure the uncut guy.
From what I heard from women in America and EU ( this is second hand information) they say it’s much easier to perform on a cut cock then an uncut one. Size plays also a factor too but in this category, women prefer cut from what I gathered.
Well I've done both, and prefer cut, unless the uncut guy is tight on hygiene it's just not nice.
I've tried both and definitely prefer to blow an intact penis.
Can I ask why?
Because the foreskin moves with my lips and hand it's easier to avoid dried up friction, and because the head is protected, it's softer and keeps moist with pre-cum. With a circumcised penis I need much more saliva and a whole other technique to keep it moist as the moisture is my only tool to move without pulling too much on the skin.
Makes sense. Thanks!
Gross, uncut they should have a warning sign, lol and they’re so proud of it too, smh
they should have a warning sign on chick's like you with a stinky vag as well
@whosnumber1 agreed
Ok, from the person that just said had no experience, lol and ur uncut penis probably sticks and unclean, lol who’s number one, not you, please 😂😂😂
Well, LOVES, since I've never given a blow job , I still voted for 'cut' since I am cut and a prior girlfriend said her prior boy friend was uncut, and she said before she would suck him she had to push the foreskin back, and clean the head and under the foreskin before she would suck him. I have read on line from other women that said they disliked uncut penises for that reason.
I rest my case for 'cut' penises.
I am moderately sized, well proportioned and cleanly circumcised. No pulling back the skin and no cleanliness issues. I have been told that I have the perfect penis for a blow job.
Wow. What a compliment.
Sexual Relationships 
Sexual Health 
Most Helpful Girls