Is it ever ok to mutilate a man’s penis?

Just wondering what people have to say...
Updates:
+1 y
I didn’t mean circumsion either... literal mutilation
0 1

Superb Opinion

  • I'll use a dictionary reference to define mutilation, and then provide an answer. Merriam-Webster provided
    1. an act or instance of destroying, removing, or severely damaging a limb or other body part of a person or animal

    2. an act or instance of damaging or altering something radically

    The reason for defining is to lessen arguments on interpretation. Most penile cutting literally fits the definition of mutilation as cutting is performed on healthy tissue. In the case of Fournier's Gangrene, or severe infection, cancer, or damage, amputation may be needed to save a person's life, so I discount those.

    I believe that a man should have the option to mutilate his penis if he so desires, but have factual, accurate, and unbiased information to make a decision.

    Forcing any kind of cutting on a minor without their consent, such as routine infant circumcision, is socially normalized mutilation. It also carries no health benefits on its own, and only diminishes sexual sensation, while sometimes causing chronic pain or numbness.

    If an adult male wants to, he should weigh the consequences. No cutting of any type should be done to a healthy person underage, especially an infant and without anesthetic.

Most Helpful Guy

  • Most people here are saying it's ok with if he's a rapist but that still feels wrong.

    Rapists are the worst I'm not gonna defend them but saying that makes mutilation ok should also mean cutting off a thief's hand is ok or executing every single murderer regardless of his reasons (self defense included).

    Personally I think it's not ok for us to allow ourselves to justify punishing someone with physical damage under any circumstances.
    So no it's NEVER ok. Rapist or not.

    Plus a rapist would still find ways to rape again given the chance it's not like that fixes him.

Most Helpful Girls

  • Let's turn the tables around so people can understand it better, would it ever be ok to stick a knife up a womans vagina forcefully, mutilating it?

  • If the man is a rapist, killer, sexual deviant, child pedo like castration is fine lol.

Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions

What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!

What Girls & Guys Said

4 16
  • Yes, sometimes that is perfectly acceptable.

    • Under what circumstances?

    • Punishment for rape or child molestation.

    • Fair enough

  • no it isn't but for most lesbian feminists which is 100% true they want more than that done to the guy.

    its an evil true conspiracy >_>
    its an evil true conspiracy >_>
  • Wtf no

  • Next question please. smh

  • People circumsize and i think that's wrong, they are the causer of STDs in our society.

  • Yes of course. Pedos and rapists. And cheaters for all i care.

    • Damn cheaters!

    • Fitting punishments to the crimes are always best lol

  • My uncle Horace got his mutilated in an industrial accident. Six months later his wife, my Aunt Edna, lost her nipples in the same plant. She was able to save most of them and kept the remains in a mason jar on the mantle next to her cat's ashes. When she was buried the mason jar and cat were buried with her. Uncle Horace is buried without his true wienie though. But just as a act of love we buried him with a package of kielbasa sausage so he can go to the next life with some spares.

  • If He wants to do it himself than more power to Him. As far as circumcision I think its a practice that needs to be relooked into because it actually makes sex less enjoyable for men due to the nerves that are lost and I think the decision should be left up to men and out of the hands of women because lets just say men have penises and women don't so they can't possibly understand the loss of a sexual organ.

    • Even though there is a difference most men surveyed can’t tell when they have sex

    • That's because they never had it in the first place so how can He tell the difference? Now go find men whom were uncircumcised and then take a surveyor before and after they get circumcised and then ask if the can tell the difference. I can assure You not many men are going to line up to take that survey because the idea of mangling their penis is enough to scare any man.

    • “Now go find men whom were uncircumcised and then take a surveyor before and after they get circumcised and then ask if the can tell the difference”. That’s exactly what I’m talking about. They don’t notice a difference.

    • Show All
  • This sounds like a circumcision question. It does no harm and does not impair any life functions. I am and have no complaints.

    • circumsized dicks are more likely to get STDs from slapping onto a toilet seat or smacking against someone's butt who sat down on a toilet seat. An uncircumsized dick only opens like a flower when inside the girl's vagina and that's acidic so less likely to get anything.

  • Maybe if he's a serial rapist or has tortured/mutilated someone else. Otherwise I don't think it's justified.

  • No, I can't imagine why it would be.

  • if he doesn't want it, remove it

  • Wtf kind of question is this 😂😭
    Never bro! Save the foreskins!
    Foreskin reparations
    Every man should get paid $2000 for loosing his foreskin without consent

    • I’ll take the $2000 then lol

    • Please

    • Let's get our fucking money kingz

  • No. It's disrespectful and unscriptural.

  • Only if he agrees

  • Mutilate as in what? Circumcision?

  • You have meant circumcision?

  • Seriously. And i got heat go using dm to 💦💦 hypothetically

  • Sure if you're gay

  • if he is a child rapist