Is it wrong to have sex with whoever you like?

[EliseAppelle19]

[Luopio27]

As long as neither is underage, cheating or doing so against the other persons will. And it is not ok to have sex with your staff, clients, customers, teachers, students and others you have a professional distance obligation. For example if a professor in a university has an affair with a student in the same university, both are adults and both will shame the uni. In many countries such violations can get people in jail.

[Being_a_good_Indian]

It's natural and more importantly, it's nothing to be ashamed about! As long as you're choosing partners that care about their health and you're maintaining yours as well, engage in a healthy sex life. You don't have to regret sleeping with different people.

[Tyrael]

Generally speaking no, but not complete strangers and know that it comes with risks and consequences.

[desidoll]

If you are not committed to anyone, nope.

[Berethor]

It's slutty if a woman have sex with many men, and most men would not want to marry her.

[Miristheiss]

That is too vague. What about having sex with another person are you asking about?

[AviatorTom]

It would be wrong to have sex with someone you don't like

[RavVid]

If you are in a relationship - definitely not smart. If you are looking for a relationship - not smart.

If you are looking to live a life alone - yeah go for it.

[Dargil]

If you asking for a moral judgement, yes it is.

[Fireguy17]

I don't think so as long as they are willing and know it might be a one and done.

[humanearth]

Nope, sex is supposed to fun

[bowenw]

As long as your are both consenting adults it does not matter.

[FilmGuy93]

It seems like you're asking for trouble when you do, more often than not, but that doesn't make it "wrong" necessarily.

[elizamichale1]

Ofcourse not darling

[Alexandrubaschet08]

why it will be wrong?

[TheSpaceGnome]

Only if whoever you like is one person and they like you back.

[call_me_scar]

Nope bang who ever you like as long as all parties involved are willing and your not cheating of course

[kellytheman]

Nah if you really like someone and they like you in a sexual way I say go have sex.

[HaveNoName]

Depends if you consider yourself an animal or a human.

[Mayo503]

Has long as it legal ….
Down to the people really

[DrewJohnson]

Yep. Enjoy!

[Twalli]

Not unless you are in a monogamous relationship

[Jerre]

No, I don’t think it’s wrong. It’s her body and she should be able to have anyone she wants in it.

[noohair]

Do you mean incest or children?

[Guardian45]

Why? Is that an option that no one told me about?

[andy530]

Not at all

[CharlieDMX]

Why? It should be in the human rights charter

[Vick2828]

It's ok so long as you aren't cheating on no one.

[abc--123]

Nope.

[cootjuhh]

nope

[Nominal]

No, its not wrong. I believe its more rational attitude. But i won't judge the other side-the christians į guess.

[riverrat3]

Nope

[tallblondejohm]

Nope

[Anonymous]

Anyone you like? Like a member of the family?

[Anonymous]

It's not wrong, per se, but I steer clear of women like that.

[Anonymous]

yes you whore

[Anonymous]

I don't have sex with people I don't like.

[Anonymous]

No, not as long as you aren't cheating or hurting anyone.

[Anonymous]

80% of the time, yes.

[Anonymous]

Why would it be?

[EliseAppelle19]

Because of STDs

[Opinion Owner]

There is an invention called the condom

[EliseAppelle19]

But herpes and hpv can still be spread

[Opinion Owner]

Well there’s a difference between something being “wrong” and something carrying a certain risk factor. It’s fine to have sex with whoever you choose to but if you’re scared of taking risk, then it’s probably best to stay on the sidelines.

[EliseAppelle19]

Agree!

[TheSpaceGnome]

"Well there’s a difference between something being “wrong” and something carrying a certain risk factor." No, thats the same thing, taking uneeded risks is wrong, and Elise, you are correct, condoms do not prevent stds spreading, as all of them spread through the mouth, nose, eyes, etc. as well as from oral sex, etc. herpes can even spread through unbroken skin to skin contact.

[Opinion Owner]

@TheSpaceGnome Bullshit. Using that nonsensical argument, sex would always be “wrong” because it always carries risk. Is that what you’re telling every sexually active person on the planet? Sex is a basic human function. It’s never “wrong”. The only question is whether a partner is right for you personally to want to assume that risk. If it’s right for you, then it’s right. You can’t guarantee any partner is disease free on any given day. So if you’re that deathly afraid of disease, then you can voluntarily remain celibate and let the rest of the world enjoy sex.

[TheSpaceGnome]

Your reply is nonsense, casual sex is always wrong, but sex within a commited, monogamous relationship, facilitates human needs, with as little risk as possible, and is therefor not wrong. Nice try though.

[TheSpaceGnome]

The idea that you should either choose between zero risk, or huge risk, rather than taking the sensible minimal risk choice, is stupid. People should not be reckless nor live in a bubble. Extremist mentality is dumb.

[Opinion Owner]

You’re deluding yourself into a false sense of security. You’re exposing yourself just the same in that monogamous relationship because you can’t guarantee that monogamy. Not ever. On any given day, that person could carry a disease the same as any random hookup. You’re making moral judgements here rather than logical ones. Sex is never wrong if the situation and partner is right for you personally. Other human beings aren’t qualified to make that judgement for you.

[TheSpaceGnome]

Sorry but none of that is true, the risk of those problems is reduced substancially with commited monogamy via a person who earned your trust. Hookups increase the risk by a LOT, so much so that its like comparing 0.0001% to 80%. I stick to my point that "all or nothing" mentalities are stupid.

[TheSpaceGnome]

I would not expect a person who does hookups to understand, as they likely never spent years getting to know a person deeply before so much as hugging them.

[Opinion Owner]

Once again, you’re trying to craft your own logic to justify a moral judgement, one you’re not qualified to make for anyone but yourself. Whether something is right or wrong for you is a personal matter. It’s that simple. Sex is a basic human need and people can discern for themselves who is right or wrong for them to engage with. You need to get over your own sense of self-importance here.

[TheSpaceGnome]

Thats a very hypocritical stance to have and a sincerely do not agree with any of it.

[Opinion Owner]

@TheSpaceGnome No hypocrisy at all. My argument was consistent throughout. You can disagree all you like. You’re still flat out wrong.